Sling
Precise sling vs TVT-O sling for Stress Incontinence
Phase 3
Waitlist Available
Research Sponsored by University of Manitoba
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial Must have
women with stress urinary incontinence with a positive cough test
patient request surgery for treatment
Must not have
Be younger than 18 years old
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up1 & 2 years post surgery
Awards & highlights
Pivotal Trial
No Placebo-Only Group
Study Summary
This trial compares two surgeries for treating female stress urinary incontinence.
Eligible Conditions
- Stress Incontinence
- Urethral Sling Surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
You will be eligible if you check “Yes” for the criteria belowSelect...
You specifically request surgery as your preferred form of treatment.
Timeline
Screening ~ 3 weeks3 visits
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~ one year
Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~one year
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.Primary outcome measures
Cough test at one year from surgery
Secondary outcome measures
Subjective symptoms, QOL questionaires
Awards & Highlights
Pivotal Trial
The final step before approval, pivotal trials feature drugs that have already shown basic safety & efficacy.
No Placebo-Only Group
All patients enrolled in this study will receive some form of active treatment.
Trial Design
1Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Precise sling vs TVT-O slingActive Control1 Intervention
Find a site
Who is running the clinical trial?
University of ManitobaLead Sponsor
569 Previous Clinical Trials
194,868 Total Patients Enrolled
Media Library
Frequently Asked Questions
These questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients, and have not been verified by our internal team.
Could you please compare and contrast the risks associated with Precise sling vs TVT-O sling?
"Precise sling vs TVT-O sling both have extensive safety data, thus they each received a score of 3."
Answered by AI