Reviewed by Michael Gill, B. Sc.
Image of Tufts University School of Dental Medicine in Boston, United States.
Phase-Based Progress Estimates
1
Effectiveness
1
Safety

Er:YAG Laserfor Peri-Implantitis

18+
All Sexes
The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons estimated that 69% of adults ages 35 to 44 have lost at least one permanent tooth. Dental implants have revolutionized dentistry by providing tooth-like replacement for missing teeth and a solution that is predictable with long-term success.. After the implant is placed, natural bacteria from the mouth can develop around implants just like around natural teeth. Studies have shown that bacterial contamination can cause peri-implantitis- gum disease or inflammation around the implant, eventually leading to bone loss. Removing bacteria from dental implant surfaces can prevent peri-implantitis, and surface debridement constitutes the basis of treatment of peri-implant disease. Typically, mechanical hand instrumentation using curettes to remove biofilm and calculus is the main basis for periodontal therapy. However, total debridement is difficult, and the hand tools may damage the surface of the implant and making it more plaque retentive. Studies have shown that mechanical non-surgical therapy alone is not sufficient to treat peri-implantitis. There is evidence that a dental laser may be an effective method to remove bacteria from implant surfaces, with less damage to the surface. One type of dental laser, Er:YAG, appears optimal for implant decontamination as the Er:YAG laser energy is primarily absorbed by water, resulting in vaporization of bacteria and minimal surface alterations on the implant surface.The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of biofilm decontamination of Er:YAG laser compared to carbon fiber curette.
Recruiting
Quick Reply
Has No Placebo
Tufts University School of Dental MedicineRobert Gyurko, DMD, PhD
10 Dental Implant Clinical Trials Near Me
Top Hospitals for Dental Implant Clinical Trials
Image of Unversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry in Alabama.
Unversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry
Birmingham
1Active Trials
0All Time Trials for Dental Implant
2022First Dental Implant Trial
Image of University of Iowa in Iowa.
University of Iowa
Iowa City
1Active Trials
0All Time Trials for Dental Implant
2022First Dental Implant Trial
Top Cities for Dental Implant Clinical Trials
Image of Boston in Massachusetts.
Boston
2Active Trials
Dr. Xiaozhe HanTop Active Site
Image of Birmingham in Alabama.
Birmingham
1Active Trials
Unversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of DentistryTop Active Site
Top Treatments for Dental Implant Clinical Trials
Treatment Name
Active Dental Implant Clinical Trials
All Time Trials for Dental Implant
First Recorded Dental Implant Trial
Strip Free gingival graft (SGG) + Acellular Dermal Matrix graft (ADM)
1
1
2021
Group 1
1
1
2020
T3 short and restoration (prosthesis)
1
1
2019
Tetranite
1
1
2019
Eztetic dental implant
1
1
2019

About The Author

Michael Gill preview

Michael Gill - B. Sc.

First Published: October 30th, 2021

Last Reviewed: October 31st, 2022

Michael Gill holds a Bachelors of Science in Integrated Science and Mathematics from McMaster University. During his degree he devoted considerable time modeling the pharmacodynamics of promising drug candidates. Since then, he has leveraged this knowledge of the investigational new drug ecosystem to help his father navigate clinical trials for multiple myeloma, an experience which prompted him to co-found Power Life Sciences: a company that helps patients access randomized controlled trials.

References1 Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/163075692 Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003 Jul;74(7):990-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/129317613 Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/231639154 Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Feb;26(1):19-29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/165150935 Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127. Epub 2014 Jun 25. Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/249662316 Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, Han T, Klokkevold P, Nedic M, Orsini M. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol. 1997 Jun;68(6):563-70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/92031007 Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628 . https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/186729858 Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/231639159 Araújo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonça AF, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):407-412. doi: 10.1111/clr.12366. Epub 2014 Mar 12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2462120310 Araújo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01854.x. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20070748