← Back to Search

ImPaC Resource Intervention (INT) for Pain

N/A
Waitlist Available
Led By Bonnie Stevens, PhD
Research Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children
Eligibility Criteria Checklist
Specific guidelines that determine who can or cannot participate in a clinical trial
Must have
Timeline
Screening 3 weeks
Treatment Varies
Follow Up at 6 months after randomization
Awards & highlights

Study Summary

This trial will test whether the "Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change" Resource can help improve pain management in hospitalized infants.

Eligible Conditions
  • Pain
  • Infants

Timeline

Screening ~ 3 weeks
Treatment ~ Varies
Follow Up ~at 6 months after randomization
This trial's timeline: 3 weeks for screening, Varies for treatment, and at 6 months after randomization for reporting.

Treatment Details

Study Objectives

Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.
Primary outcome measures
Frequency of painful procedures
Proportion of infants with procedural pain assessed
Proportion of infants with procedural pain management
Secondary outcome measures
Implementation costs
Integration of the Resource into the practice (Reach)
Use of the Resource (Feasibility/Fidelity)
Other outcome measures
Context evaluation (ACT)

Trial Design

2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Standard Practice (SP)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
The SP arm will continue as usual with their unit or institutional standard pain practices and any strategies that they would normally use to improve them (e.g. new staff orientation).
Group II: ImPaC Resource Intervention (INT)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
The INT arm will receive the 7-step web-based ImPaC intervention to use over 6 months. The intervention is divided into the Plan Stage and the Change Stage. The Plan Stage (steps 1-4) is expected to be completed in 1 month. The Change Stage (steps 5-7) is expected to be completed in 1-2 months. We anticipate that Change Teams will be able to complete 2 cycles of change over the 6-month intervention period.
Treatment
First Studied
Drug Approval Stage
How many patients have taken this drug
ImPaC Resource Intervention (INT)
2019
N/A
~30

Find a Location

Who is running the clinical trial?

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)OTHER_GOV
1,347 Previous Clinical Trials
26,453,892 Total Patients Enrolled
11 Trials studying Pain
2,067 Patients Enrolled for Pain
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenLead Sponsor
691 Previous Clinical Trials
6,945,535 Total Patients Enrolled
22 Trials studying Pain
6,822 Patients Enrolled for Pain
Bonnie Stevens, PhDPrincipal InvestigatorThe Hospital for Sick Children
1 Previous Clinical Trials
172 Total Patients Enrolled
1 Trials studying Pain
172 Patients Enrolled for Pain

Frequently Asked Questions

These questions and answers are submitted by anonymous patients, and have not been verified by our internal team.

Has enrollment for this experiment already begun?

"Unfortunately, according to the clinicaltrials.gov page dedicated to this study, it is no longer accepting candidates. Originally posted on April 5th 2019 and last updated November 13th 2021, even though this trial has concluded its recruitment period there are still 356 other trials that need participants at present."

Answered by AI
Recent research and studies
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services ResearchJournal
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda
Proctor, Enola, Hiie Silmere, Ramesh Raghavan, Peter Hovmand, Greg Aarons, Alicia Bunger, Richard Griffey, and Melissa Hensley. 2010. “Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda”. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
Implementation ScienceJournal
Implementation of Multidimensional Knowledge Translation Strategies to Improve Procedural Pain in Hospitalized Children
Stevens, Bonnie J, Janet Yamada, Sara Promislow, Jennifer Stinson, Denise Harrison, and J Charles Victor. 2014. “Implementation of Multidimensional Knowledge Translation Strategies to Improve Procedural Pain in Hospitalized Children”. Implementation Science. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0120-1.
Applied Nursing ResearchJournal
Validation and Testing of the Acceptability E-scale for Web-based Patient-reported Outcomes in Cancer Care
Tariman, Joseph D., Donna L. Berry, Barbara Halpenny, Seth Wolpin, and Karen Schepp. 2011. “Validation and Testing of the Acceptability E-scale for Web-based Patient-reported Outcomes in Cancer Care”. Applied Nursing Research. Elsevier BV. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2009.04.003.
TrialsJournal
A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (impac) Resource to Improve Pain Practices in Hospitalized Infants: A Study Protocol
Bueno, Mariana, Bonnie Stevens, Melanie A. Barwick, Shirine Riahi, Shelly-Anne Li, Alexa Lanese, Andrew R. Willan, et al.. 2020. “A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Infant Pain Practice Change (impac) Resource to Improve Pain Practices in Hospitalized Infants: A Study Protocol”. Trials. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3782-9.
~3 spots leftby May 2025
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top