This trial is evaluating whether Brentuximab Vedotin will improve 1 primary outcome and 5 secondary outcomes in patients with Immunoblastic Lymphadenopathy. Measurement will happen over the course of 30 days after end of treatment.
This trial requires 40 total participants across 2 different treatment groups
This trial involves 2 different treatments. Brentuximab Vedotin is the primary treatment being studied. Participants will all receive the same treatment. There is no placebo group. The treatments being tested are in Phase 2 and have already been tested with other people.
For patients with immunoblastic lymphadenopathy, our experience with many standard medication has shown that most individuals require steroids, either alone or in combination with other medications. We believe that, in those cases in which corticosteroids do not provide good results, it is prudent to consider treatment with cytotoxic medications. In the vast majority of cases in which these medications can be used clinically, they tend to provide excellent results. The use of cytotoxic medications, when possible, will produce excellent long-term results.
IDL is a disorder that is marked by unexplained lymphadenopathy and low-grade fever accompanied by high production of IgM antibodies. IDL is a very rare disorder in Western countries but is relatively common in Asian countries.
The incidence of immunoblastic lymphadenopathy was estimated at 1.5 people per 100,000 per year in this study.\nHowever, the incidence of immunoblastic lymphadenopathy may be higher, because the study included only 3 hospitals and the number of patients and procedures may have been underestimated.\nTherefore, the actual incidence we calculated was probably higher, i.e., 1.5/100,000. This calculation could be made by using Medicare beneficiaries aged>or= 50 years. \nIt is possible that a number of individuals other than those examined by this study experienced an immunoblastic lymphadenopathy.
Our case suggests that patients with immunoblastic lymphadenopathy may be cured or the condition resolved following aggressive therapy. More extensive studies are needed to confirm these findings on immunoblastic lymphadenopathy.
The ILD is considered an immunoregulatory syndrome characterized by the production of autoantibodies specifically directed against cells of B-cell lineage. The pathogenesis of ILD is still a subject of investigation and research. There are a number of drugs which influence immunological and immunochemical changes. There is no evidence, however, in support of the theory that certain drugs, either in a specific form or in a combination with other substances, cause the development of ILD. Further investigations, both in vivo and in vitro, are warranted to establish the full pathogenic mechanism. Since the development of ILD usually follows immunoglobulin light chain malignancies, it is also advisable to investigate patients who develop ILD.
While it is considered a rare neoplasm, it should be distinguished from other B-cell proliferative disorders such as lymphoma, reactive lymphadenopathy, follicular dendritic cell-associated lymphadenopathy, and reactive nodular hyperplasia. These lesions frequently show an inverted immunophenotype to that seen in the neoplastic B cells from mantle cell lymphoma and primary peripheral B-cell lymphoma, and are difficult to distinguish, making diagnostic uncertainty commonplace. Clinical presentation, histologic features, and immunophenotype should be a good guide in making the correct diagnosis. Biopsy remains the best available technique for definitive diagnosis.
BVV shows promise as both a single-agent and combination therapy in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. The clinical activity of BVV in FL and mantle cell lymphoma is very limited. The optimal dosing schedule and method of administering BVV and any combination treatment options have yet to be defined, so further clinical research is urgently awaited.
Primary IBL is an inflammatory lymphadenopathy that can be caused by any of several diseases, including viral infections (including human herpes viruses and human papillomavirus), autoimmune conditions (such as systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjorgen's syndrome), infectious diseases (such as Lyme disease and Kaposi's sarcoma), and malignancies (such as lymphoma and lymphoma-like disorders). There are no specific pathogenic hypotheses for this condition.
Brentuximab vedotin is being used cautiously to treat only a minority of patients with rituximab-refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and rituximab/brentuximab-refractory marginal zone lymphoma. The indications for treatment with brentuximab vedotin should be discussed with patients and caregivers.
The median interval of the lesions found in the lymph nodes in patients with AIL are between 2.5 and 9 months, regardless of clinical status or histological type. Results from a recent clinical trial suggest that this symptom may be present for an extended period time. Clinicians should remain alert of this possibility and ask the patients with a suspicious finding to come to the laboratory for the proper diagnosis of AIL.
The prognosis of ILD/AITD has not improved in a decade despite improvement in management. Long term survival in these cohorts is in the 20-50% range. Younger age at diagnosis is associated with better survival.
The common side effects of brentuximab vedotin and its constituents were similar to other antimitotic agents and were not different for patients of all age groups analyzed. Common side effects from brentuximab vedotin treatment included grade 2 to 4 hypersensitivity and grade 1/2 infusion reactions.