Orbital Atherectomy vs. Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease

(ECLIPSE Trial)

Not currently recruiting at 109 trial locations
KS
KS
LR
DH
SA
OR
EW
DS
Overseen ByDaniel Sherbet, MD
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial compares two methods for treating severely blocked heart arteries: orbital atherectomy and conventional balloon angioplasty. Orbital atherectomy uses a special tool to shave away hard plaque in arteries, while balloon angioplasty uses a balloon to open them. Researchers aim to determine which method is superior before placing a drug-eluting stent, which releases medication to keep the artery open longer. Individuals with stable or recently worsened heart disease who haven't had recent unsuccessful heart procedures might be suitable for this trial. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to contribute to understanding which treatment method may be more effective for future patients.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, it mentions that participants should not have a contraindication to certain therapies, so it's best to discuss your medications with the trial team.

What prior data suggests that these techniques are safe for treating coronary artery disease?

Research has shown that the Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS), also known as the Diamondback 360, has been tested for safety and effectiveness. One study found that 19.4% of patients experienced major heart-related issues, such as heart attacks or the need for another procedure, within two years after treatment. These results are typical for treatments of serious heart conditions.

The traditional balloon angioplasty is a common method approved by the FDA for treating blocked heart arteries. It is considered safe and is often used to prepare arteries before placing drug-eluting stents, which help keep arteries open.

Both treatments have been used in patients with heart conditions, and their safety is well-documented. While Orbital Atherectomy and balloon angioplasty carry risks, healthcare professionals manage these risks carefully.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about these treatments because they present unique approaches for managing coronary artery disease. Orbital Atherectomy stands out because it uses the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System to precisely prepare the artery by sanding away calcified plaque before placing a stent. This is different from the conventional balloon angioplasty, which simply inflates a balloon to widen the artery but may not be as effective in heavily calcified vessels. The orbital atherectomy's ability to better prepare complex lesions potentially leads to improved stent placement and long-term outcomes.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for coronary artery disease?

This trial will compare Orbital Atherectomy with Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for coronary artery disease. Research has shown that orbital atherectomy can effectively reduce plaque in the heart's arteries. It employs a spinning, diamond-coated tool to clear the way for stent placement, which is crucial for treating very hardened arteries. Studies have found that using this method before placing drug-coated stents can lead to fewer complications. Conversely, conventional balloon angioplasty, another treatment option in this trial, is widely used and has a strong track record of preparing arteries for stents, though it may not be as effective on very hardened areas as orbital atherectomy. Both treatments aim to improve blood flow, but the best choice depends on the specific condition of the artery.678910

Who Is on the Research Team?

Ajay J. Kirtane, MD, Cardiovascular ...

Ajay Kirtane, MD

Principal Investigator

Columbia University Medical Center / New York-Presbyterian Hospital

PG

Philippe Généreux, MD

Principal Investigator

Morristown Medical Center

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults with stable heart disease or recent heart attacks who've consented to the study. It's not for those with a short life expectancy, planned cardiac interventions within a year (except certain PCIs), contraindications to antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, cognitive issues affecting participation, pregnancy, chemotherapy within 30 days of the procedure, sensitivity to contrast media that can't be pre-medicated, prior heart transplant or PCI in target vessel within a year.

Inclusion Criteria

My heart condition is stable or I had a recent heart attack that's now stable.
Subject has signed the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee (EC) approved ECLIPSE trial Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to any trial related procedures

Exclusion Criteria

I have heart failure, shown by severe symptoms or test results.
You are allergic to the ingredients in the atherectomy lubricant, such as soybean oil, egg yolk phospholipids, glycerin, and sodium hydroxide.
I have a bleeding disorder or won't accept a blood transfusion.
See 15 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo either Orbital Atherectomy or Conventional Balloon Angioplasty prior to implantation of drug-eluting stents

Procedure

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with primary outcome measured at 1 year

1 year

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Balloon Angioplasty
  • Orbital Atherectomy
Trial Overview The ECLIPSE Trial compares Orbital Atherectomy and conventional balloon angioplasty before placing drug-eluting stents in severely calcified arteries. Participants are randomly assigned one of these treatments to see which is more effective at preparing arteries for stent placement.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Orbital Atherectomy (OA)Active Control1 Intervention
Group II: Conventional Balloon AngioplastyActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Abbott Medical Devices

Lead Sponsor

Trials
659
Recruited
420,000+
Founded
1888
Headquarters
Abbott Park, Illinois, USA
Known For
Medical Devices Innovation
Top Products
FreeStyle Libre, MitraClip, XIENCE Stents, TECNIS IOLs
Dr. Etahn Korngold profile image

Dr. Etahn Korngold

Abbott Medical Devices

Chief Medical Officer

Medical training at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital

Robert B. Ford profile image

Robert B. Ford

Abbott Medical Devices

Chief Executive Officer since 2020

Bachelor's degree from Boston College, MBA from UC Berkeley, Haas School of Business

Cardiovascular Systems Inc

Lead Sponsor

Trials
17
Recruited
7,300+

Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York

Collaborator

Trials
28
Recruited
27,800+

Citations

Long‐Term Effectiveness of a Stent‐Less Strategy With ...Drug‐coated balloon (DCB) is an option for in‐stent restenosis, and has also shown promise for small‐calibre coronary artery disease. We ...
Long-term efficacy of drug-coated balloon-based treatment ...Data from the pooled analysis of contemporary DES trials indicate an average estimated risk of stent-related adverse events of 2% per year, ...
Drug-Coated Balloons in the Management of Coronary ...DCBs provide improved long-term vessel patency compared with conventional balloon angioplasty and may be comparable to drug-eluting stents ...
a 12-month comparative study with drug-eluting stents - PMCClinical and angiographic outcomes of coronary dissection after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease.
Drug-Coated Balloons-Based Intervention for Coronary ...Recent studies show that DCBs can be effective and safe across various coronary artery diseases (CADs) when lesions are adequately prepared.
fda summary of safety and effectiveness data (ssed)Three (3) in vivo studies were performed to demonstrate performance and safety of the. DIAMONDBACK 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) ...
Diamondback 360 | AbbottOrbital Atherectomy is a First-line Approach for Optimal Vessel Prep in Complex PCI Cases with Severe Calcium. Coronary calcium tends to be underestimated.
Patient Selection and Procedural Considerations for ...This article summarises currently available publications on orbital atherectomy (Cardiovascular Systems Inc.) and compares them with rotational atherectomy.
NCT02132611 | Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System StudyThis is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, global study designed to evaluate performance of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System Micro ...
Device to Sand Away Severe Calcium in Coronary Arteries ...The new data followed patients to two years after their procedure. Results showed 19.4 percent of patients experienced a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security