Sevelamer Hydrochloride

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of two different preoperative hemodialysis schedules for people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who undergo surgical procedures. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is it feasible to randomize participants with ESKD undergoing nonemergent surgical procedures to same-day hemodialysis versus no same-day hemodialysis? Is it safe to randomize participants with ESKD undergoing nonemergent surgical procedures to same-day hemodialysis versus no same-day hemodialysis? Researchers will compare the two hemodialysis schedules to see if the scheduling and safety profiles are the same. Participants will: Answer questions about their health up to 4 weeks before and 4 weeks after the surgical procedure. Receive hemodialysis on the day of the surgical procedure or not, depending on the study treatment assignment.

Cognitive decline is increasingly recognized among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD). This can include trouble remembering, slower thinking or mentally feeling foggy. This research is being done to determine if a new medication (AV-001) can protect the brain from injury caused by hemodialysis by strengthening blood vessels in the brain and reducing inflammation. If successful, this research could lead to better protection for the brains of people undergoing regular dialysis, potentially reducing the risk of cognitive decline and stroke.

Kidney failure is common. In some people the ability of the kidneys to clean poisons out of the blood gets so low they need to be hooked up to a machine three times a week to do it for them. This is called dialysis. Unfortunately, although this treatment removes those waste products, people who need dialysis die much more often than people who don't need dialysis. Dialysis causes extreme stress on the body and leads to many organs being damaged. Removing fluid from the body quickly causes the equivalent of repeated little heart attacks or little strokes in the brain. Many patients struggle to tolerate having all the fluid that they have drunk since their last dialysis session removed- without unpleasant symptoms of dangerously low blood pressure (which makes the damage worse). Dialysis treatments can be done more slowly or more often, but that means having to spend a lot more time at the hospital and is difficult for the health system to be able to provide the extra treatment time. Could extra fluid be removed in between dialysis sessions? Up to now there has not been a way to effectively do this. Investigators have now designed and built an entirely new, very small and very simplified, device that can do part of what a dialysis machine does. It doesn't clean the blood or replace the need for conventional dialysis sessions, but it can provide additional and gentle removal of fluid which wasn't able to be taken off during a standard treatment session. If this study is successful, it will be the first time that a wearable device has been successfully built and used to take off extra fluid when dialysis patients are not in the hospital. The ability to do this opens up the possibility of, 1) helping to treat patients (both making people feel better and live longer) who can't tolerate getting off all the fluid in the short 3-4 hours they are on the dialysis machine in the hospital, and 2) helping patients who feel OK having the fluid taken off but are silently being subjected to damage to their organs due to the rapid removal, have reduced damage.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of a standard intradialytic exercise program (control group) to an individualized, patient-centered, "Move-More" physical activity intervention (intervention group) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Exercise programs often fail to yield robust benefits for many HD patients, in part because the type and volume of exercise prescribed is inappropriate for a variety of reasons, and the benefits from these studies are often disappointing, as they are characterized by poor adherence, high dropout rates, and modest effects on physical function, body composition, cardiovascular disease risk, and other outcomes related to quality of life (QOL). To address this, the investigators have designed a novel physical activity intervention "Move More" that is designed to overcome many of the barriers to increasing physical activity in this population. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a standard intradialytic exercise program (control group) to an individualized, patient-centered, "Move-More" physical activity intervention (intervention group) in HD patients. The investigators primary hypothesis is that patients randomized to the Move More intervention will increase their physical activity levels more than those in the intradialytic exercise group. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does "Move More" increase the physical activity levels (minutes) measured through weekly minutes of physical activity and the LoPAQ questionnaire more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? For secondary outcomes this study aims to answer the following: * Does "Move More" improve the physical function of hemodialysis patients assessed by the short physical performance battery (SPBB) more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" decrease fatigue assess by the SONG-HD survey more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" decrease symptoms of depression assessed by PROMIS Depression Short Form 8a more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" increase the amount of exercise measured through a point system more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" improve blood pressure (BP) more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program?

This randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial will evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan (compared with placebo) on echocardiographic measures of hypervolemia, preservation of residual renal function, and key safety parameters in incident hemodialysis patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of a 12-week cycling during hemodialysis program on hemodialysis-induced myocardial stunning in adult individuals receiving hemodialysis.

The goal of the CSP-2002 clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the InnAVasc Arteriovenous Graft (IG) for hemodialysis (HD) access in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The primary study endpoints are: Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: The proportion of subjects with secondary patency at 6 months. Primary Safety Endpoint: The incidence of device-related adverse events of special interest (AESIs) through 6 months. Participants will be asked to sign an informed consent form. Once enrolled, they will be assessed to receive the study graft implant and asked to participate in periodic follow-up visits and assessments through 2 years following implant.

Many patients on hemodialysis have low levels of magnesium. Magnesium is needed to keep the heart, kidneys, and other organs working properly. Patients with low serum magnesium concentration have a higher risk of death, heart issues, muscle cramps and fractures. There are several reasons why patients on dialysis have low levels of magnesium-these include poor diet, medication interference, and the dialysis procedure itself, which leaches small amounts of magnesium from the blood during each treatment. One way to make sure that patients on dialysis are getting enough magnesium is to increase its concentration in the dialysate. The investigator would like to do a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of increasing the concentration of magnesium in the dialysate on the risk of people on dialysis dying or being admitted to the hospital due to heart issues. The investigator thinks increasing the magnesium in the dialysate will help patients live longer, have fewer hospitalisations related to heart disease and patients may also experience less cramping associated with dialysis. This simple adjustment to the dialysis procedure can be done at little cost and may even reduce overall healthcare costs. If the investigator can show that increasing magnesium in the dialysate improves patients' health, then it could become the standard of care for all patients on dialysis.