Norepinephrine Bitartrate

This is a prospective, unmasked, randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluating the impact of point-of-care large language model (LLM)-based decision support on diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes in adult medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients. Consecutive adult ICU admissions at participating community hospitals (initially MetroWest Medical Center and St. Vincent Hospital) will be screened for eligibility. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to standard care or an AI-assisted group. In both arms, initial evaluation and management will follow usual practice. For patients randomized to AI assistance, de-identified admission data (history and physical, labs, imaging reports, and other relevant documentation) will be formatted and submitted to a state-of-the-art LLM (ChatGPT-5) at the time of admission. The AI-generated differential diagnosis and therapeutic recommendations will be provided to the admitting team for consideration. For the standard care arm, LLM output will be generated but not shared with clinicians. After discharge, a masked chart review will determine the "ground truth" primary diagnosis and extract outcomes including: Primary Outcome - a composite of medical errors (from time of ICU admission through day 7 of ICU stay, or ICU discharge, whichever comes first); Secondary Outcomes - 90-day mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and ventilator-free days.

The purpose of this study is to pilot two resilience interventions for cardiac arrest survivors and their informal caregivers, Recovering Together after Cardiac Arrest 1 and Recovering Together after Cardiac Arrest 2 . The data the investigators gather in this study will be used to further refine the interventions.

Pediatric cardiac arrest is a life-threatening problem affecting \>15,000 hospitalized children each year. Less than half of these children survive to hospital discharge, and neurologic morbidity is common among survivors. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the OPTI-VENT bundle to improve survival to discharge with favorable neurological outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category Score 1-2 or no change from baseline) among children receiving at least 1 minute of CPR.

Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening emergency that requires immediate treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). While chest compressions circulate blood, manual ventilation provides oxygen to the patient. Current CPR guidelines recommend specific ventilation rates and tidal volumes, but studies show that clinicians often deliver too much or too little ventilation due to a lack of monitoring tools, potentially reducing the effectiveness of CPR and impacting survival. The PRECISION-CPR study is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether using real-time feedback devices to precisely control ventilation during CPR can improve patient outcomes. Adult patients experiencing in-hospital cardiac arrest will be randomized to receive either standard manual ventilation guided by clinician experience or precision-controlled ventilation tailored to the patient's predicted body weight using real-time monitoring devices. The primary outcome of the study will be return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Secondary outcomes will include survival to hospital discharge, neurological recovery, and other clinical measures. By addressing the limitations of current ventilation practices, this study aims to generate evidence to guide future resuscitation guidelines and improve survival rates after cardiac arrest.

Using medications to increase blood pressure, called vasopressors, is invaluable in treating patients who have difficulty maintaining stable blood pressure. Vasopressors are usually infused through a central venous catheter (CVC), which is a flexible tube placed in the large vein of the neck, arm or groin. CVCs require a skilled clinician and often with an ultrasound to prevent complications such as a collapsed lung or bleeding. Alternatively, the infusion of vasopressors through a peripheral venous catheter (PVC), a thin tube placed in the smaller veins of the arm or hand has been avoided due to the risk of extravasation, which is the leakage of fluid to surrounding tissues. This can lead to potential tissue death requiring surgery. However, emerging research shows the safety of infusing vasopressors through a PVC, referred to as peripheral vasopressors. There is a growing interest in peripheral vasopressors for two main reasons: to expedite vasopressor initiation in patients with refractory shock and to avoid CVC placement and its potential complications. However, a standardized protocol for administration is lacking and many clinicians still avoid peripheral vasopressors due to lack of high-quality evidence. The investigators will examine the effectiveness of implementing a peripheral vasopressor protocol by conducting a feasibility study and assessing outcomes such as the safety of peripheral vasopressors and the acceptability rate of healthcare providers. By conducting this study, the investigators aim to provide the framework to conduct larger, multi-center trials and to provide high-quality data for the future use of a standardized peripheral vasopressor protocol.

To evaluate the initial safety and effectiveness of the Ventor Airway System in providing short-term ventilation support in non-breathing subjects during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and respiratory arrests.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if backup pacing at an increased rate improves hemodynamics in adults with relative bradycardia, a permanent pacemaker, and cardiogenic shock. The main question it aims to answer is: Does increasing the backup pacing rate to 100 beats per minute lead to improved cardiac index compared to a backup pacing rate of 75 beats per minute Participants who are already hospitalized in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit with a permanent pacemaker and pulmonary artery catheter in place will be enrolled in this study. Participants will be exposed to each pacemaker rate in a randomized order with hemodynamics assessed after 10 minutes at each rate.

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to determine if conducting a larger study using venous excess ultrasound (VEXUS) to guide fluid management in patients with septic shock is feasible. Septic shock is a life-threatening condition where infection causes dangerously low blood pressure. While fluids are essential for treatment, too much fluid can harm the kidneys and result in the need for dialysis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is it feasible to recruit patients, obtain consent, and follow the VEXUS-guided management protocol? 2. Does VEXUS-guided management, compared with usual care, improve the health and well-being of patients with septic shock? Researchers will compare two groups: one receiving VEXUS-guided fluid management versus another receiving standard care, to assess the feasibility of a larger trial and explore whether VEXUS prevents fluid overload and kidney problems. Participants in the VEXUS group will: 1. Undergo VEXUS scans every 24 hours for 3 days 2. Receive fluid management guided by VEXUS findings (including fluid restriction or removal if we identify venous congestion) and undergo cardiac ultrasound if we identify moderate to severe congestion 3. Be monitored for 28 days to track kidney function, need for dialysis, and survival.

Two different techniques for placing a central venous catheter will be compared. The studyu team hypothesizes that clinicians randomized to the peripheral catheter technique will have higher first attempt success rates, fewer procedural complications, and a shorter mean time to procedure completion than physicians assigned to wire through hollow bore needle.

Sub-optimal transfer of clinical information during inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) is common and can lead to patient harm. To address this problem, the investigators will use key stakeholder input to refine and implement an interoperable health information exchange platform that integrates with the electronic health record and improves the reliability of and access to necessary clinical information in three use cases involving transfer of patients between sending and receiving hospitals with varying levels of affiliation and health record integration. The investigators will assess the effect of this intervention on frequency of medical errors, evaluate the use and usability of this platform from the perspective of those that interact with it, and use these results to develop a dissemination plan to spread implementation and use of this platform across other similar institutions.

The objectives of this multicenter pragmatic clinical trial are to compare the effectiveness and relative safety of balanced fluid resuscitation versus 0.9% "normal" saline in children with septic shock, including whether balanced fluid resuscitation can reduce progression of kidney injury.

The investigators hypothesis is that for ICU patients with shock, the use of the vasoactive drugs phenylephrine and vasopressin will reduce tachydysrhythmias when compared to norepinephrine and epinephrine. To investigate this hypothesis, the investigators are conducting a randomized double blind controlled trial comparing phenylephrine and vasopressin vs. norepinephrine and epinephrine in ICU patients with shock that is not responsive to IV fluids. All patients admitted to the adult intensive care units at the University of Chicago will be screened for eligibility.