Tamiflu

This is a two-arm, open-label, randomized, phase 1, controlled clinical trial intended to evaluate the safety and immunologic response to the experimental vaccine H1ssF (H1 stabilized stem ferritin nanoparticle) and the seasonal flu vaccine Flucelvax.

TreatResp is a double-blind, individually randomized, multi-centre adaptive platform trial. TreatResp aims to establish an adaptive platform trial aimed at evaluating the clinical- and cost-effectiveness, practical challenges, and outcomes of therapeutics for respiratory pathogens in non-hospitalized patients. Participants will be randomized to receive usual care (i.e., supportive care and symptom relief) or a study therapeutic, which will be determined by the TreatResp Therapeutics Committee. The primary outcomes being evaluated is time to recovery.

CIRV2 is a Phase IV randomized, open-label, trial of FDA-approved COVID-19 and/or influenza vaccines (no more than minimal risk) with longitudinal follow-up. In 2025 CIRV2 will compare immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the recombinant Novavax COVID-19 vaccine and the mRNA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

The Metrix Respiratory Panel Test will be evaluated for use in Non-Laboratory settings in a home testing environment utilizing the clinical study design described herein. The study will take place in simulated home environments which will be set up within or near active clinical settings (e.g., urgent care facilities). This will be a prospective study conducted at three or more investigational sites located within the United States for the clinical validation of the Metrix Respiratory Panel Test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A, Influenza B, Respiratory syncytial virus, and Rhinovirus in anterior nares (AN) swab samples. Additional sites may be added to the study in order to meet minimum subject/sample enrollment requirements and geographic prevalence of respiratory virus infections. Comparator testing will be performed to determine the infection status of each sample for comparison to results generated by the candidate test. The primary comparator for the study will be an FDA-cleared assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A, Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Rhinovirus.

This will be a follow-up study to the "Comparison of High Dose vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine in Lung Allograft Recipient" study (DMID Protocol Number 22-0014) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with advanced lung disease, and is also associated with an improvement in quality of life. However, due to the need for life-long immunosuppression to prevent acute cellular rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction ("chronic rejection"), lung transplant recipients are at risk for developing major infections. In fact, one-year survival is 85%, with infection being the leading cause of death within the first year post-transplant. We will conduct a follow-up phase II, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the impact of subsequent administration of two doses of HD-IIV compared to two doses of SD-IIV among lung recipients during the early post-transplant period. Demonstration of improved immunogenicity from two doses of HD-IIV over consecutive influenza seasons would provide potential broad benefit in reducing influenza disease and its associated complications in lung transplant recipients. Moreover, studying vaccine immunogenicity and safety in the same participants over consecutive years can provide insight into the influence of immunosuppression levels and allograft aging on vaccine-mediated immune modulation. This proposed study design will contribute significantly to influenza vaccination guidance and policy for the highly vulnerable lung transplant population. This proposed study is designed to address several key knowledge gaps in vaccine-mediated protection of lung transplant recipients against influenza: * Is there increased immunogenicity with administration of one or two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV in the subsequent season compared to two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV in the first season? * What is the durability of the humoral and cellular immune response between influenza seasons and does two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV sustain higher HAI titers compared to two doses of HD-IIV or SD-IIV in the first season? * What is the impact of maintenance immunosuppression levels on influenza vaccine immunogenicity within the same participant? * Will the optimal immunogenic vaccination strategy be associated with an acceptable long-term safety profile over successive influenza seasons, including injection-site and systemic reactions, allosensitization, and organ rejection?

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 study conducted at a single center with approximately 78 healthy adults aged 18-59 years. Part 1 Single Ascending Dose (SAD) will enroll 48 participants into six cohorts (S1-S6) to receive single oral doses of VNT-101 (100-1500 mg) or placebo under fasting or fed (S5 only) conditions. Part 2 Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) will enroll 30 participants into three cohorts (M1-M3) to receive multiple oral doses of VNT-101 (250-750 mg BID Days 1-5, QD Day 6) or placebo under fasting conditions. Dose escalation in both parts will proceed after Protocol Safety Review Team (PSRT) review. The primary objective for Part 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single ascending oral (SAD) doses of VNT-101 in healthy adult participants under either fasting or fed conditions. The primary objective for part 2 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple ascending oral (MAD) doses of VNT-101 in healthy adult participants.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well CD388 works in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed influenza infections, as compared to placebo, when given as a single dose via 3 subcutaneous (SQ) injections to adult and adolescent participants who are at higher risk of developing influenza complications, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CD388, as compared to placebo.

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the safety of administration of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) preventive monoclonal antibody and other routine childhood vaccines given simultaneously at Visit 1, as compared to sequential administration of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) preventive monoclonal antibody and other vaccines at separate visits (Visits 1 and 2).

This protocol describes a clinical trial to develop and validate a Controlled Human Infection Model (CHIM) for influenza A/Arkansas/08/2020 (pH1N1). The study is designed to determine the optimal infectious dose of the pH1N1 challenge strain for use in future clinical trials evaluating influenza countermeasures. The study will enroll and challenge adult volunteers with the pH1N1 influenza virus challenge or sham inoculations. Given the adaptive design of this trial, the potential number of participants can vary. Depending on the pathway recommended by the PSRT and followed in the Trial Schema, the study population can range from around 30 to 120. However, it is anticipated that the final sample size will be around 60 participants receiving pH1N1 challenge product plus approximately 4 persons receiving a sham inoculation. Participants will be pre-screened for health and for serological HAI antibody titers of \</1:40 against the challenge strain. Eligible participants will be enrolled sequentially into challenge cohorts and will be randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either sham inoculation or the interventional study product at a dose between 10\^6 to 10\^7 TCID50 (or 10\^5 TCID50 if needed). Dose titration will be conducted under an adaptive escalation schedule whereby dosing will start at 10\^6 TCID50 and escalate to the next dose if a pre-determined symptomatic influenza attack rate and clinical symptom score thresholds are not met and if the dose is determined to be safe with no pre-defined halting criteria being met. The primary objectives of this study are to determine the optimal infectious dose of a pH1N1 viral challenge to cause laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza and to assess the safety profile of pH1N1 viral challenge.

The study aims to evaluate whether unscheduled return visits within one week for similar complaints are impacted by ensuring parents leave the emergency department (ED) with a prescription for appropriately dosed acetaminophen and ibuprofen for their child.

This is a research study to understand what happens when a person is infected with influenza ("flu") and how the body controls the infection. Healthy participants (challenge) will be infected with a strain of flu (H3N2), and followed to see what symptoms occur and when they occur. Blood will be drawn and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs will be collected before participants are infected to understand if having antibodies can protect participants from flu infection or lead to a milder flu illness. Blood will also be drawn and NP swabs collected after participants are infected to understand how and when the body's immune response to flu occurs. Participants will also breathe through a device for virus collection every other day. Participants will be screened during one or more visits and will stay in the inpatient challenge unit for at least 10 days, maybe longer. Participants will complete a FLU PRO Diary Card daily. Blood will be drawn before the challenge and on Days 2, 4, and 8 while in the inpatient unit. NP samples will be taken every day to check for viruses and on certain days, immune responses such as antibodies. If on Day 8 (7 days after the challenge) the participant still has flu virus, medicine will be offered to treat the flu and the participant will be asked to stay in the challenge unit until NP swabs are negative for 2 consecutive days. Once the participant is discharged from the challenge unit, they will be asked to return to the clinic for 3 more visits. At the end of the study will be a final phone call.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether drinking pasteurized milk (milk heated to kill harmful germs) that contains inactive particles of a flu virus called A(H5) could lead to the detection of the virus in the nose or throat. Inactive particles are not capable of causing disease. The results will help the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) better understand how milk consumption could affect flu surveillance. Investigators also want to see if the body produces antibodies in response to this milk consumption.