270 Participants Needed

Sperm Preparation Techniques for Infertility

(PIoUS Trial)

AT
EH
Overseen ByElena Hoskin
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial compares two ways of preparing sperm for fertility treatment. One method spins the sperm to pick out the good ones, while the other uses a special device to sort them naturally. The study aims to see which method leads to better pregnancy outcomes for patients undergoing intrauterine insemination.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Density gradient centrifugation, Density Gradient Centrifugation, Isopycnic Centrifugation, Rate-Zonal Centrifugation, Zymot Multi sperm separation device, ZyMōt Multi Sperm Separation Device, ZyMōt ICSI Sperm Separation Device for infertility?

Research shows that density gradient centrifugation can improve sperm quality by increasing motility and reducing damage, which is important for successful fertilization. Additionally, the ZyMot Multi device has been shown to improve clinical pregnancy rates in IVF by selecting sperm with better DNA integrity.12345

Is sperm preparation using techniques like density gradient centrifugation and ZyMōt devices safe for humans?

The available research suggests that sperm preparation techniques like density gradient centrifugation and ZyMōt devices are generally safe for use in humans, as they are commonly used in assisted reproductive technologies like in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) without reported safety concerns.23467

How does the treatment using Density Gradient Centrifugation and ZyMōt Multi Sperm Separation Device differ from other infertility treatments?

The Density Gradient Centrifugation and ZyMōt Multi Sperm Separation Device are unique because they focus on selecting the best quality sperm by separating them based on their density and motility, which can improve the chances of successful fertilization. Unlike some other methods, the ZyMōt device uses microfluidic technology to gently select sperm without the stress of centrifugation, potentially preserving sperm quality better.13489

Research Team

MR

Mitchell Rosen, M.D.

Principal Investigator

University of California, San Francisco

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for individuals assigned female at birth, under the age of 41, who are undergoing intrauterine insemination due to anovulation or unexplained infertility. It's not suitable for those with significant diseases or psychiatric disorders that affect consent, users of frozen donor sperm, non-English speakers, or those with prior intrauterine inseminations.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who are getting intrauterine insemination.
I am a woman under 41 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

I am using frozen donor sperm for conception.
Non-English speaker
You have had a previous intrauterine insemination.
See 1 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo intrauterine insemination treatment with either density gradient centrifugation or Zymot sperm separation device over three cycles

3 months
Multiple visits as per treatment cycle

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for pregnancy outcomes until referred for prenatal care at 8-10 weeks of pregnancy

5 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Density gradient centrifugation
  • Zymot Multi sperm separation device
Trial OverviewThe study compares two methods of preparing sperm before intrauterine insemination: Zymot Multi (a microfluidic sorting device) and density gradient centrifugation. The goal is to see which method leads to better pregnancy outcomes in a randomized controlled setting.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Density gradient centrifugationActive Control1 Intervention
Patients will undergo sperm preparation by density gradient centrifugation
Group II: Zymot sperm separation deviceActive Control1 Intervention
Patients will undergo sperm preparation by the Zymot sperm separation device

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of California, San Francisco

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2,636
Recruited
19,080,000+

Findings from Research

In a study involving 121 women undergoing intrauterine insemination, both PureSperm and Percoll density gradient methods were found to be equally effective in recovering sperm with progressive motility.
The clinical pregnancy rates were similar for both methods, with 12.5% for PureSperm and 13.8% for Percoll, indicating that PureSperm is a viable alternative for sperm preparation in fertility treatments.
Comparing the clinical outcomes of intrauterine insemination by two different density gradient preparation methods.Tsai, YC., Lin, MY., Chen, SH., et al.[2019]
Density gradient centrifugation using 90% AllGrad® effectively reduces cryoprotectant levels in cryopreserved milt of Rhamdia qhelen, resulting in a higher percentage of normal spermatozoa (22.25% compared to 13% in non-centrifuged samples).
The method not only improves sperm motility and reduces head damage but is also easy to adapt and apply, making it a promising tool for enhancing the quality of cryopreserved sperm in this species.
Sperm selection of cryopreserved milt of catfish (Rhamdia quelen) by density gradient centrifugation with AllGrad® 90.Pérez-Atehortúa, M., Galuppo, A., Rodrigues, RB., et al.[2021]
The study compared the efficacy of the new Multi-ZSC system for separating human sperm against the traditional double-wash swim-up method.
Results indicated that the double-wash swim-up method selects sperm with superior head shape and better ability to undergo acrosome reaction, suggesting it may be more effective for certain fertility applications.
Comparing the Multi-ZSC one-step standardized swim-up method to the double-wash swim-up method with regard to the effects of sperm separation on morphology, head morphometry, and acrosome reaction inducibility.Lampiao, F., du Plessis, SS.[2019]

References

Comparing the clinical outcomes of intrauterine insemination by two different density gradient preparation methods. [2019]
Sperm selection of cryopreserved milt of catfish (Rhamdia quelen) by density gradient centrifugation with AllGrad® 90. [2021]
Comparing the Multi-ZSC one-step standardized swim-up method to the double-wash swim-up method with regard to the effects of sperm separation on morphology, head morphometry, and acrosome reaction inducibility. [2019]
Selection of frozen-thawed stallion semen by microfluidic technology. [2023]
Comparative Study of Sperm Selection Techniques for Pregnancy Rates in an Unselected IVF-ICSI Population. [2023]
[Separation of spermatozoa using Percoll gradients: value for in vitro fertilization]. [2006]
Outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using human sperm prepared via a new standardized swim-up technique fit for office use. [2020]
Comparison of characteristics of human spermatozoa selected by the multiple-tube swim-up and simple discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation. [2019]
Comparison of centrifugation- and noncentrifugation-based techniques for recovery of motile human sperm in assisted reproduction. [2019]