Metreton

This study is open to adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called BI 3000202 helps people with SLE. The study tests different doses of BI 3000202 and aims to find the best dose for people with this condition. Participants are put into 5 groups randomly, which means by chance. 4 groups get different doses of BI 3000202, and 1 group gets a placebo. Placebo tablets look like BI 3000202 tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take the tablets for 1 year. All participants also continue their regular treatment for SLE. Participants are in the study for a bit longer than 1 year. During this time, they visit the study site regularly. Doctors check the participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects. They also compare the results between the groups to see if the treatment works.

The purpose of this study is to find out whether the combination of mezigdomide and revumenib is a safe treatment for people with relapsed or refractory KMT2A-r, NUP98-r, and NPM1-m acute leukemias.

Background: Cognitive symptoms are common and often severe in patients with brain metastases, significantly impacting their quality of life and ability to manage cancer care. Currently, there is no standard approach for routinely assessing and managing these symptoms in oncology clinics. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Cognitive Stepped Care Program (CSCP) in a Brain Metastases Clinic. Methods: This is a prospective, mixed-methods feasibility study involving patients with brain metastases, their caregivers, and clinic staff. Patients will undergo routine cognitive symptom screening using a standardized tool. Based on symptom severity, they will receive tiered interventions ranging from no support, to education materials, to computerized cognitive testing with individualized debrief, with group strategy training and/or neuropsychological consultation, as needed. Patients will complete questionnaires before and after the intervention regarding their symptoms and quality of life. Patients, caregivers and staff will provide their feedback about the intervention through questionnaires and interviews. Outcomes: Primary outcomes include feasibility and acceptability of the CSCP. Secondary outcomes include preliminary changes in cognitive symptoms, self-efficacy, and quality of life. Significance: This study will inform the potential integration of a structured cognitive support program into standard care for patients with brain metastases and may provide a model for similar interventions in other oncology settings.

Introduction 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) is an emerging option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, up to half of patients fail to show meaningful clinical benefit with this therapy. A dual-modality strategy seeks to increase dose via complementary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in underdosed tumor regions. We hypothesize that by combining both modalities (EBRT and RLT) in an hybrid, adaptive approach, we can safely improve skeletal related events when compared to standard-of-care (SOC) 177Lu-PSMA alone. Methodology Adaptive EBRT and RLT for mCRPC (ARREST) is a pragmatic registry-based phase 2, multi-center randomized controlled trial within the PERa prospective cohort (NCT03378856) planned to activate in 2025. Patients who are receiving SOC 177Lu-PSMA with targetable metastatic burden identified on imaging suitable for EBRT will be eligible. One hundred and thirty eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either SOC 177Lu-PSMA therapy alone (maximum 6 cycles) or to combined 177Lu-PSMA plus EBRT boost. Patients in the experimental arm will undergo FDG-PET at study entry and SPECT-CT after each cycle of radioligand therapy. Lesions selected for EBRT boost will be selected based on a set of criteria that include estimated suboptimal dose absorbed from 177LuPSMA, lesions demonstrating low PSMA but high FDG update, symptomatic lesions, and those at high risk for skeletal-related events. Selected lesions will receive single-fraction EBRT. Dose prescribed will range from 6-12 Gy with the ideal goal of a combined total biological effective dose of ≥75 Gy (α/β = 1.4) with priority to dose limits for organs at risk. A maximum treatment time of 60 minutes is permitted for each EBRT boost treatment. Patients in the experimental arm that achieve complete response measured by 177Lu-SPECT-CT and PSA will pause ARREST and resume at progression. The primary endpoint is skeletal related events at 1 year. Secondary objectives include overal survival, 177Lu-SPECT-CT and PSA response, toxicity, and quality of life. The sample size is designed to detect a 12 month imporvement in the rate of skeletal related events with a HR 1.6, two-sided alpha of 0.1 and 80% power. Conclusion ARREST is hypothesized to safely optimize tumor dose, offering a personalized hybrid approach that may lead to improved patient outcomes. In addition, this study will permit further understanding of these two distinct radiation delivery methods and their effect on tissues, thereby refining the relative biological effectiveness model for more precise treatment planning.

This clinical trial tests if oral vancomycin can safely treat active ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults who also have primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a liver condition. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can oral vancomycin improve UC symptoms as measured by Mayo score at 4 weeks? * Is oral vancomycin safe and tolerable in this patient group? Participants will be compared to see if vancomycin works better than placebo. Participants will: * Take oral vancomycin (250 mg twice daily) or identical placebo capsules for 4 weeks * Have the option for 4 more weeks of open-label vancomycin after the blinded phase * Attend clinic visits at baseline, week 4, and follow-up for Mayo scoring, endoscopy, blood/stool tests, and safety checks * Track treatment adherence and side effects The study primarily assesses if the trial can recruit 14 participants, retain them, achieve good adherence, and follow protocol procedures (feasibility). Secondary goals include safety (adverse events) and early signs of benefit in UC activity, liver tests, and gut bacteria balance. This pilot will guide larger future studies.

The HOW LONG trial is an international, multicenter, Phase IV randomized clinical trial evaluating the optimal duration of adjunctive systemic corticosteroids in immunocompromised adults with severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) who demonstrate early clinical recovery. Participants who no longer require supplemental oxygen by day 10 of corticosteroid therapy are randomized to discontinue corticosteroids at day 10 (or hospital discharge, if earlier) versus continue corticosteroids for a total of 21 days. The trial assesses whether earlier discontinuation reduces steroid-related complications while maintaining clinical outcomes.

This Phase 2b study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KT-621 in participants with uncontrolled moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma. The main goals of this study are to investigate how effective KT-621 is at treating uncontrolled moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma, the safety and tolerability of KT-621, and how KT-621 behaves in the body.

This study is researching 2 experimental drugs, REGN5713 and REGN5715. The study drugs will be either of these drugs given alone (either REGN5713 or REGN5715) or given together (REGN5713 and REGN5715) to reduce eye allergy signs and symptoms due to birch tree pollen allergy. The aim of the study is to see how safe and effective the study drugs are at lowering eye allergy signs and symptoms compared with placebo. The study will also evaluate whether the combination (REGN5713-5715) has different effectiveness than REGN5713 or REGN5715 alone. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking the study drugs * How much of the study drugs is in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drugs (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects)

This trial is a Phase 1b, open-label, multi-center, clinical study of AZD0120, a BCMA/CD19 dual targeting CAR+ T-cell therapy, to evaluate the safety and tolerability in adult participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), or difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA).

This two-stage, multicenter clinical trial is designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of at-home ultrasound stimulation to activate immune-neuromodulation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and at least moderate disease activity. The study will enroll up to 40 participants at up to 6 sites across 2 stages. The findings from this trial will directly inform the design and power calculations for a future pivotal trial by identifying an appropriate effect size and confirming protocol feasibility and safety for a daily home-use therapy.

To demonstrate that bimekizumab administered intravenously is noninferior to subcutaneous administration.

The primary objective of this study is to characterize the efficacy and safety of dosing regimens used to transition from prior pericarditis therapies to KPL-387 monotherapy in participants with well-controlled recurrent pericarditis on standard therapies.