120 Participants Needed

Self-Production Learning Techniques for Second Language Acquisition

LM
Overseen ByLaura Morett, Ph.D.
Age: 18 - 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

Do I need to stop taking my current medications for this trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Self-production for second language acquisition?

Research shows that learners understand words they have spoken themselves better than those spoken by others, suggesting that self-production helps in adapting to one's own speech patterns, which can aid in second language learning.12345

Is self-production learning for second language acquisition safe for humans?

The research articles provided do not contain specific safety data regarding self-production learning techniques for second language acquisition. They focus on the effectiveness and mechanisms of language learning rather than safety concerns.36789

How does the self-production treatment for second language learning differ from other treatments?

The self-production treatment is unique because it leverages learners' familiarity with their own accented speech patterns, which can enhance their understanding of second language words they produce themselves. This approach is different from other methods that may not focus on the individual's own speech production as a tool for learning.310111213

What is the purpose of this trial?

Self-production facilitates acquisition of spoken words, signs, and characters from an unfamiliar second language. The proposed work investigates how motor cortex, a key part of the brain enabling body action, supports their acquisition via production as well as perception, providing insight into whether they are learned via mental simulation of the body actions used to produce them. It is hypothesized that activity in motor cortex will differ based on the body part used to produce lexical items (e.g., mouth vs. hands), will be greater for lexical items learned via production than observation, and will differentiate lexical items recognized successfully vs. unsuccessfully.

Research Team

LM

Laura Morett, Ph.D.

Principal Investigator

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for right-handed, native English speakers who want to learn a second language. It's not suitable for people with metal body implants, hearing or vision problems, speech or learning disorders, or those already familiar with sign language or logographic languages.

Inclusion Criteria

I am a native English speaker.
Right-handed

Exclusion Criteria

Hearing or vision impairments
Knowledge of sign language or languages with logographic characters
Unsecured metal body implants
See 1 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Learning

Participants engage in self-production and perception of L2 lexical items to facilitate acquisition

1 week
Multiple sessions (in-person)

Recognition

Functional activity in motor cortex is measured to assess recognition of L2 lexical items

5 minutes
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for functional activity in motor cortex at recognition 1 week after learning

1 week
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Self-production
Trial Overview The study explores how the motor cortex of the brain helps adults learn new words, signs, and characters in a second language through both seeing and doing. Participants will engage in self-production tasks to see if this enhances their learning process.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Self-productionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
L2 lexical items self-produced at learning
Group II: PerceptionActive Control1 Intervention
L2 lexical items heard or observed an additional time at learning

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

Lead Sponsor

Trials
49
Recruited
17,900+

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Collaborator

Trials
2,103
Recruited
2,760,000+

References

A laboratory study of naturalistic second language learning: Acquiring grammatical gender from simple dialogue. [2022]
Factors Influencing L2 Self-repair Behavior: The Role of L2 Proficiency, Attentional Control and L1 Self-repair Behavior. [2020]
The impact of one's own voice and production skills on word recognition in a second language. [2019]
Frontoparietal Anatomical Connectivity Predicts Second Language Learning Success. [2022]
Prior Pronunciation Knowledge Bootstraps Word Learning. [2021]
Incidental learning of abstract rules for non-dominant word orders. [2021]
The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis. [2011]
Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics. [2008]
The advantages of listening to academic content in a second language may be outweighed by disadvantages: A cognitive load theory approach. [2022]
A Multidimensional Perspective on Individual Differences in Multilingual Learners' L2 Chinese Speech Production. [2020]
Benefits of Enacting and Observing Gestures on Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [2023]
From self-regulated learning to computer-delivered integrated speaking testing: Does monitoring always monitor? [2023]
Teaching with social context in instructional video facilitates second language vocabulary learning. [2023]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security