Flomax

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of HIFU therapy for benign prostatic tissue ablation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) that caused by Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The primary objective of the study is to determine the efficacy of HIFU therapy by assessing the changes in IPSS score in 6-month post HIFU procedure for BPH with compared to baseline. The secondary objectives of this study are as follow: * To assess any adverse events related to the procedure or device. * To assess the operation related characteristics including: total operation time and ablation time required in HIFU procedure for BPH, total catheterization time after the HIFU procedure for BPH, and categorical ablation zone * To assess the patient's post operative pain level at different post op time points. * To assess the urinary flow and symptoms improvement by studying the changes in IPSS, Qmax, and PVR at different post op time points compared to the baseline. * To assess the effectiveness of HIFU by studying the changes in PSA levels, types of medication for BPH or any urologic condition, proportion of patients who are taking BPH medication, prostate volume, and prostate calcification level and the reoperation rate within 12-month post-op. * To assess changes in patients' sexual function at different post op time points. The hypothesis is that a HIFU ablation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with LUTS due to BOO from BPH.

The purpose of this study is to compare post-prostatectomy incontinence via Michigan Incontinence Score Index in patients receiving daily text message reminders for pelvic floor exercises when compared to those not receiving text reminders.

The goal of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the FloStent, a medical device used to treat men with symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, compared to sham (procedure without deployment of the FloStent). All participants will undergo a flexible cystoscopy and those randomized to the treatment arm will receive the FloStent, while those randomized to the sham arm will not receive the FloStent.

Lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) affect older men and their frequency and severity increase with age. According to Berry et al., the histological diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increases from 25% in the group age between 40 to 49 years to 80% in the group age between 70 to 79 years (1). However, this hyperplasia can lead to a bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE), causing storage and voiding symptoms, associated with a considerable impairment of the quality of life (2). Surgical therapy of BPH has continuously evolved in recent years. The current gold standard for the endoscopic treatment of BPH is the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Other innovative techniques were developed including Urolift, transurethral laser enucleation (holmium, thulium) and Aquablation therapy. One of the latest technologies for the management of BPH are Optilume BPH Catheter System (Optilume®, Urotronic Inc, Minneapolis, USA) and Rezum Water Vapor Therapy (Rezum System, Bostocn Scientific, Marlborough, MA). The purpose of the present study is to compare between patient experience, symptom relief and functional improvement when using the Optilume BPH Catheter System (Optilume®, Urotronic Inc, Minneapolis, USA) and Rezum Water Vapor Therapy (Rezum System, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA).

The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the continued safety and effectiveness for the Optilume BPH Catheter System.

This is a single-center pilot randomized controlled trial among 68 physically "inactive" older men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) assessing a 12-week remote exercise intervention versus health education control.

Specific Aim 1. To evaluate the efficacy of TNF antagonist action in BPH/LUTS Specific Aim 2. Define the consequences of TNF antagonist therapy on prostate tissue Specific Aim 3. Identify genetic predictors to stratify patients with differential response to TNF-antagonist therapy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the performance and safety of the AQUABEAM Robotic System for the resection and removal of prostate tissue in patients experiencing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and are diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Participants will go through baseline and follow up assessments up to 12 months.

This trial studies the outcomes of medical procedures on unborn babies to treat serious urinary blockages. It focuses on pregnant women and their fetuses with severe urinary tract obstructions. The treatment aims to clear the blockage, allowing normal urine flow and aiding in fetal development.

This trial is evaluating two methods for addressing prostate issues to determine which one better improves symptoms in patients.

This is a Phase II prospective clinical trial in which patients with prostate carcinoma and obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms electing for radiation therapy will undergo Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) prior to treatment. PAE will be administered by Interventional Radiology. Patients will be seen for follow-up at 6 weeks and 12 weeks following PAE after which they will start definitive radiotherapy. After completion of radiotherapy the patient will be seen at 12 weeks

This trial aims to compare the safety of the iTind device with UroLift for men who have urinary problems because of an enlarged prostate. The iTind device temporarily reshapes the prostate tissue to help improve urine flow. iTIND is the second-generation version of a temporary implantable device, which is one of the latest minimally invasive surgeries available to treat bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostate enlargement.