25 Participants Needed

PrimeTaper EV Implant for Dental Implants

CB
Overseen ByChristopher Barwacz, DDS
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests the PrimeTaper dental implant, which is used to replace missing teeth by inserting it into the jawbone. The study focuses on patients needing dental implants and checks if the implant stays in place and works well over time.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are using medications like corticosteroids, bisphosphonates, or other drugs that could affect healing, you may not be eligible to participate.

Is the PrimeTaper EV Implant safe for use in humans?

The safety of dental implants, including systems similar to PrimeTaper EV, has been evaluated in studies and through FDA reports. These evaluations often involve monitoring adverse events (unwanted effects) and long-term success rates, with some studies showing high success rates over several years.12345

How is the PrimeTaper EV Implant treatment different from other dental implant treatments?

The PrimeTaper EV Implant is unique because it focuses on osseointegration, where the implant surface directly connects with the bone without any intervening tissue, which is crucial for stability and long-term success. Unlike traditional implants that may not fully integrate with the surrounding bone, this approach aims to create a more natural and durable connection.678910

Research Team

CB

Christopher Barwacz, Dr

Principal Investigator

University of Iowa

Eligibility Criteria

Adults aged 18-75 needing a dental implant, with stable bite and adjacent teeth or crowns. Must be able to pay for associated costs, attend all study visits over 5.5 years, and understand English without a translator. Excluded if pregnant/breastfeeding, allergic to materials used in implants, have certain diseases or conditions affecting healing/osseointegration, are smokers or have substance abuse issues.

Inclusion Criteria

Willing and able to sign and date the informed consent form and willing to attend 11 study visits over the next 5.5 years
Must be fluent in speaking, reading, and comprehending English without need for a translator
Deemed by the investigator as likely to present with an initially stable implant situation
See 5 more

Exclusion Criteria

Previous enrollment in the present clinical investigation
Unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits for a period of 5 years
Not willing to participate in the clinical investigation or not able to understand the content of the clinical investigation
See 13 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Implant Placement

PrimeTaper implant is placed with post-op check-up and impression visit for permanent restoration

1-2 weeks
2 visits (in-person)

Permanent Restoration

Permanent restoration is placed no more than 6 months after implant placement

Up to 6 months
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for implant survival and condition of peri-implant mucosa

5 years
6 visits (in-person) at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • PrimeTaper EV Implant
Trial OverviewThe trial is testing the PrimeTaper EV Implant's success rate over five years after permanent restoration placement. Participants will undergo implant surgery followed by several check-ups and impressions for the final crown within six months post-surgery.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: PrimeTaper EV ImplantExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
All subjects will receive 1 PrimeTaper EV implant, UDI 0739253224012WR

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Iowa

Lead Sponsor

Trials
486
Recruited
934,000+

Findings from Research

From 1996 to 2011, there were 28,046 adverse event reports related to dental devices in the MAUDE database, with 53.5% of these reports concerning endosseous implants, highlighting a significant area of concern in dental device safety.
Among the reported adverse events, there were 66 death reports associated with dental devices, although many lacked sufficient information to confirm the circumstances, indicating a need for better reporting and monitoring systems in dental care.
The dangers of dental devices as reported in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.Hebballi, NB., Ramoni, R., Kalenderian, E., et al.[2021]
During a study analyzing dental device adverse events from August 1996 to June 1999, 28,555 reports (10.5% of total) were related to dental devices, with the majority involving injuries (64.4%) and a small number of deaths (0.007%).
Endosseous implants were the most frequently reported dental devices, accounting for over 90% of the reports, highlighting the importance of monitoring these devices for safety and efficacy.
Dental device-associated problems: an analysis of FDA postmarket surveillance data.Fuller, J., Parmentier, C.[2019]

References

Clinical evaluation of a novel dental implant system as single implants under immediate loading conditions - 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. [2021]
The dangers of dental devices as reported in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. [2021]
The CE mark for implantable medical devices. [2019]
A 10-year multicenter retrospective clinical study of 1715 implants placed with the edentulous ridge expansion technique. [2009]
Dental device-associated problems: an analysis of FDA postmarket surveillance data. [2019]
Ligaplants: Uprising Regimen in the Glebe of Implant Dentistry. [2023]
Immediate vs. early loading of SLA implants in the posterior mandible: 5-year results of randomized controlled clinical trial. [2022]
The Astra Tech Single-Tooth Implant System: a report on 27 consecutively placed and restored implants. [2004]
A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data. [2016]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
MkII--a modified self-tapping Brånemark implant: 3-year results of a controlled prospective pilot study. [2004]