Bupivacaine for Kidney Stones
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial tests whether bupivacaine, a local anesthetic, can reduce pain and urinary symptoms after a kidney stone procedure. Researchers will administer bupivacaine directly into the bladder post-procedure to determine its effectiveness compared to a placebo. Individuals diagnosed with kidney stones and scheduled for a procedure involving ureteral stenting may be suitable candidates for this trial. The aim is to enhance comfort and quality of life after surgery. As a Phase 2 trial, this research measures the treatment's effectiveness in an initial, smaller group, allowing participants to contribute to medical advancements.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.
Is there any evidence suggesting that bupivacaine is likely to be safe for humans?
Research has shown that bupivacaine is generally safe and effective for pain relief. One study found that using bupivacaine after kidney surgery effectively managed pain without major safety issues. Patients who received bupivacaine reported less pain compared to those who did not. The treatment did not cause significant side effects, indicating it is a safe option for pain control after certain surgeries. Although this trial is in an early stage, some evidence of safety in humans exists, but more information is needed to fully understand its safety.12345
Why do researchers think this study treatment might be promising?
Unlike standard treatments for kidney stones, such as shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy, bupivacaine offers a novel approach by focusing on pain relief. Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic that targets nerve signals, potentially providing effective pain management without the need for opioids. Researchers are excited about its ability to alleviate pain directly at the site, which could lead to fewer systemic side effects and a reduced need for narcotics. This could significantly enhance patient comfort and recovery during the often painful process of passing kidney stones.
What evidence suggests that bupivacaine might be an effective treatment for post-operative pain after ureteroscopy?
Research has shown that bupivacaine effectively reduces pain after surgery. In other procedures, patients have reported less pain with bupivacaine use. One study found that applying bupivacaine around the surgical area reduced the need for opioid painkillers in the first 48 hours post-surgery. This trial will test 50 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for its potential to manage pain after procedures like ureteroscopy for kidney stones. Although few studies have examined bupivacaine use in the bladder post-surgery, its success in other surgeries suggests it could be effective here as well.12467
Who Is on the Research Team?
Luke Reynolds, MD
Principal Investigator
University of Chicago
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for individuals undergoing ureteroscopy, a procedure to treat kidney stones. Participants should be those who are scheduled for this surgery and can provide informed consent. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria details were not provided.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants receive either 50 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine or a placebo of 50 ml of Normal Saline following ureteroscopy, laser lithotripsy, and ureteral stenting
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for post-operative pain and quality of life using a Visual Analog Scale and Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Bupivacaine
Trial Overview
The study is testing the effectiveness of bupivacaine, a local anesthetic, in reducing pain after ureteroscopy compared to normal saline (a placebo). Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either bupivacaine or saline in their bladder post-surgery.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Placebo Group
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
University of Chicago
Lead Sponsor
Published Research Related to This Trial
Citations
Influence of anesthesia methods on surgical outcomes and ...
Results. Stone-free rate was higher in the GA (92.3%, 36 of 39) than the SA (71.0%, 22 of 31) (P = 0.019) group. Pain score was higher in the ...
Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Pain Control After ...
The following data will also be recorded and serve as the secondary outcomes: Patient's pain rating at 6, 12, and 48 hours in all arms; Patient's pain rating ...
A Comparative Study of Spinal Anaesthesia with 0.5% ...
Stone-free rates (91.7% vs 93.3%) and patient/surgeon satisfaction scores were comparable between groups. Conclusion: 0.75% ropivacaine provides ...
The efficacy of bupivacaine infiltration along nephrostomy ...
The secondary outcomes were the time for first opioid demands, the num- ber of opioid demands, and the total opioid con- sumption over the 48 h postoperatively.
Subcutaneous Bupivacaine Infiltration and Postoperative ...
Purpose: Recent studies have shown a significant decrease in patient reported pain scores when the nephrostomy tube size.
Postoperative Pain Score of Bupivacaine versus Placebo ...
Bupivacaine infiltration into the nephrostomy tract is a highly effective and safe in postoperative pain management for patients undergoing standard PCNL.
Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Anesthesia with 0.5 ... - Impactfactor
The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia using intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% and hyperbaric bupivacaine ...
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Related Searches
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.