Rib Fractures

Current Location

16 Rib Fractures Trials Near You

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Rib Fractures patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Learn More About Power
No Placebo
Highly Paid
Stay on Current Meds
Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
Breakthrough Medication

Cryoneurolysis for Rib Fracture Pain

Cleveland, Ohio
Thoracic trauma frequently involve rib fractures which can be very painful for 2-3 months. Unfortunately, pain is not simply a "symptom" of the injuries, but a significant cause of additional medical problems: pain causes people to breath and cough less deeply/often which increases the risk of collapsing little parts of the lung. These collapsed areas often lead to complications which can increase the risk of death. In addition, the higher the amount of pain in the weeks following the fracture, the higher the risk of developing persistent, chronic pain that can last indefinitely. So, providing excellent pain control is very important for a variety of reasons. Various nerve blocks can greatly decrease pain, but even the longest acting are measured in hours or days, and not the weeks and months for which rib fracture pain can last. Therefore, opioids-"narcotics"-are the most common pain control method provided to patients; but they frequently do not provide enough pain control, have undesirable side effects like nausea and vomiting, and are sometimes misused which can lead to addiction or overdose. A prolonged nerve block lasting multiple months from a single treatment may be provided by freezing the nerve using a process called "cryoneurolysis". With cryoneurolysis and ultrasound machines, a very small "probe" may be placed through anesthetized skin and guided to the target nerve to allow freezing. The procedure takes about 5 minutes for each nerve, involves little discomfort, has no side effects, and cannot be misused or addictive. After 2-3 months, the nerve returns to normal functioning. The investigators have completed a small study suggesting that a single cryoneurolysis treatment provides potent short- and long-term pain relief following thoracic trauma with rib fractures. The ultimate objective of the proposed research is to determine if percutaneous cryoneurolysis is an effective non-opioid, single-application treatment for pain following traumatic rib fracture. The current project is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, triple-masked (investigators, participants, statisticians), sham/placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, human-subjects, post-market clinical trial to determine if cryoneurolysis is an effective non-opioid treatment for pain following traumatic rib fractures.

Trial Details

Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased

120 Participants Needed

CINB + Medical Therapy for Rib Fractures

Lexington, Kentucky
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded study comparing CINB plus medical therapy versus standard medical care (non-steroidals and opioids intravenous/oral inpatient and oral outpatient) alone for patients with multiple rib fractures. The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of continuous intercostal nerve block (CINB) in the treatment of patients admitted to the adult trauma service with rib fractures. The effectiveness of CINB as adjunctive treatment will be compared to standard medical therapy involving nonsteroidal and intravenous/oral opioid medications.
Stay on current meds
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4

180 Participants Needed

Blue Light Therapy for Rib Fractures

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The main goal of this clinical trial is to learn if light therapy improves pain and inflammation in adults with painful rib fractures. The main question it aims to answer is: - Does bright blue light therapy in addition to standard pain treatments improve pain with breathing in adults with painful rib fractures? Researchers will compare participants who receive bright blue light therapy to participants who receive white light therapy and participants who receive only usual lighting conditions to look for differences in their pain control. In addition to their assigned light treatment, all participants will receive standard pain control treatments. Participants will be assigned randomly to one of three groups: one-third will be assigned to bright blue light therapy, one-third will be assigned to bright white light therapy, and one-third will be assigned to usual light only. They will receive their assigned light treatment for 4 hours during the morning/early afternoon for up to 3 days while they are in the hospital. On each day they receive the light treatment and on the day after their final light treatment: * They will be asked twice to rate their pain at rest and with taking a deep breath. * They will be tested to confirm that they are not experiencing delirium, or confusion related to being in the hospital. * They will be asked to wear a heart monitor to look for changes in their heart rate. * Blood samples will be collected to look for changes in inflammation and the circadian clock, the body's natural 24-hour cycle.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

75 Participants Needed

Ketamine vs Lidocaine for Rib Fractures

Grand Rapids, Michigan
Rib fractures continue to be a common occurrence in trauma patients of all ages. Traumatic rib fractures can cause severe pain in patients and lead to shallow breathing and further complications such as the need for mechanical ventilation, hospital or ventilator associated pneumonia, atelectasis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Effective multimodal pain management is needed to optimize a patient's respiratory status and can also play a role in early mobility, less pulmonary complications, shorter ICU and hospital length of stay, and decreased mortality. Current multimodal pain management options include opioids, muscle relaxants, gabapentin, acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and various regional/neuraxial anesthesia techniques. Both ketamine and lidocaine infusions for pain control have also been shown in studies to be safe and effective, with the benefit of minimizing the use of opioids. However, there have been very few studies that have used ketamine or lidocaine infusions for pain control specifically in patients with traumatic rib fractures. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate ketamine versus lidocaine infusions as an adjunctive therapy to reduce opioid consumption in the first 72 hours in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures.
Stay on current meds
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4

74 Participants Needed

Cryoablation for Rib Fractures

Winston-Salem, North Carolina
To determine if patients with intraoperative cryoablation have better analgesia results compared to the control group of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures (SSRF) without cryoablation
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

80 Participants Needed

Cryoneurolysis for Rib Fractures

Toronto, Ontario
Traumatic rib fractures (i.e., broken ribs caused by a physical injury) are common and very painful. They also often lead to serious complications, more time spent in hospital, and can even lead to death. Even after rib fractures have healed, they can lead to long-term pain and a lower quality of life. A technology called cryoneurolysis, which acts to freeze nerves causing pain using a small tool which can turn very cold, is a promising new way to manage rib fracture pain. This study is a test with a small number of people to see if it is feasible to use this technology for patients with rib fractures. If this is successful, we will recruit more people for a larger study to see if cryoneurolysis, along with standard pain control techniques, is better at stopping pain, compared to just the normal techniques alone. Participants in our study will be asked to rate their pain, and record pain medications that they take for 3 months after their pain procedure.

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

24 Participants Needed

Lidocaine + Ketamine vs Paravertebral Block for Rib Fractures

Washington, District of Columbia
Rib fractures are a common admission to the trauma service. The mainstay of treatment is pain control to improve respiratory effort in order to offset the risk of pneumonia and mechanical ventilation. In addition to standard pain control modalities, the investigator's institution utilizes paravertebral blocks as well as lidocaine and ketamine infusions for pain control. The current standard of care for pain control is to begin with acetaminophen, ibuprofen or celecoxib and opioids with the addition of paravertebral blocks as needed. In certain situations, a paravertebral block is contraindicated, and pain control is relegated to lidocaine and ketamine infusion. The use of lidocaine infusion alone and ketamine infusion alone for pain control has been studied and has been shown to be safe. However, concurrent use of these two medications to control rib fracture pain is relatively new and the efficacy compared to paravertebral block is not known. The goal of the study is to show non-inferiority of simultaneous lidocaine and ketamine infusions versus paravertebral blocks.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Early Phase 1

170 Participants Needed

Nerve Block for Rib Fractures

York, Pennsylvania
This study is a single center, randomized controlled trial examining the effect of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on pain, PIC scores and other clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with multiple rib fractures in comparison to the use of analgesic medication alone. Objectives 1. Compare SAPB performed in the ED setting to analgesic medication alone with regard to pain, respiratory status and PIC score of patients with multiple rib fractures. 2. Assess the safety and feasibility of performing ultrasound-guided SAPB in the ED. 3. Evaluate outcomes of patients receiving the SAPB in the ED including amount of analgesic medications used, level of care required, need for upgrading level of care, and length of stay.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

60 Participants Needed

Pain Relief Techniques for Rib Fractures

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
This study will be a 3-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial comparing three analgesic techniques for rib fractures with a sample size of 24 patients (8 per group). Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: 1) ESP block with catheter using ropivacaine (bolus followed by continuous infusion); 2) lidocaine bolus (1 mg/kg) and infusion starting at 1 mg/kg/h; or 3) standard care with multimodal analgesia and opioids. Our specific aims are: 1. To compare the opioid use and pain ratings over the first 72 hours after enrollment. 2. To quantify the changes in vital capacity, oxygen requirement, and freedom from mechanical ventilation that result from the intervention. 3. To explore the impact of ESP blocks and lidocaine infusions on the development of chronic pain and post-discharge opioid use (exploratory). Inclusion Criteria: • Adult patients ≥ 55 years old who have sustained 3 or more unilateral rib fractures and are admitted to the hospital. Exclusion Criteria: * Allergy to amide local anesthetics, lidocaine, or ropivacaine * Pregnancy * Bilateral rib fractures * Coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5; PTT \> 1.5 times ULN, or platelets \< 75,000) * Conduction block on EKG * Total body weight \< 40 kg * Painful distracting injuries: acute thoracic spine fracture, severe traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury, unstable pelvic fracture, open abdomen * Spine fracture at the level of intended ESP block * Infection near the ESP insertion site or active bacteremia or sepsis * Any patient deemed a poor candidate for ESP block and/or lidocaine infusion will also be excluded
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Age:55+

24 Participants Needed

Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Rib Fractures

Providence, Rhode Island
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of the Serratus Anterior Plane Block in patients with rib fractures. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Determine if UG-SAPB results in an improved pain, incentive spirometry, and cough ability (PIC) score when compared to usual care over the first five hours. * Evaluate if UG-SAPB results in fewer opioid medications administered when compared to usual care over the first 24 hours. Participants will undergo the Serratus Anterior Plane. Researchers will compare this to usual care to see if this intervention improves pulmonary function and reduces opioid requirements for ED patients with rib fractures.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Early Phase 1

40 Participants Needed

Cryoablation for Rib Fractures

Minneapolis, Minnesota
The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with rib fractures who undergo cryoablation of the intercostal nerves have improved pain control 7 days from procedure when compared to those who have a ESP catheter.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4

48 Participants Needed

Portable Dynamic Chest X-Ray for ICU Patients

Boston, Massachusetts
Dynamic digital radiography (DDR) is a new advanced version of chest radiography that captures dynamic images at a rate of 15 frames per second. It is coupled with an analytical software that allows it to provide more advanced measures of lung motion, ventilation, and perfusion compared to traditional chest radiography. While implementation of DDR fixed machines are beginning elsewhere in the US, this trial involves the first applications of an FDA-approved portable DDR machine, for use at the bedside in the ICU. The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the feasibility and safety of portable DDR technology in the ICU, as well as to evaluate the improved clinical diagnostic value of the portable DDR system over current standards of care. Participants will receive one to three sets of DDR images, which will then be compared to their clinical gold standard exams (such as chest x-rays, CTs, or VQ scans) to assess and improve the precision and accuracy of measurements such as diaphragmatic motion, lung movement, and perfusion.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

230 Participants Needed

Cryoablation for Rib Fractures

Loma Linda, California
The goal of this double blinded randomized control trial is to learn if percutaneous cryoablation of traumatic rib fractures improves outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does percutaneous cryoablation improve short and long term pain scores? Does percutaneous cryoablation improve short and long term respiratory mechanics? Does percutaneous cryoablation improve long term quality of life? Does percutaneous cryoablation decrease delirium? Researchers will compare cryoablation to standard multimodal pain therapy to see if this impacts respiratory recovery. Participants will undergo randomization, percutaneous cryoablative procedure, and participate in tests at pre-determined intervals to evaluate their pulmonary recovery.

Trial Details

Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

30 Participants Needed

Lidocaine IV vs. ESP Block for Rib Fractures

Stanford, California
Recently in 2016, a new interfascial plane nerve block was developed for thoracic analgesia known as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). Since its development for thoracic neuropathic pain, the ESPB has been shown to be effective in pain control in multiple procedures including thoracotomies. However, there have been a few published case reports of using ESPB for analgesia in rib fracture management and only one retrospective study which demonstrated improved NRS pain scores and increased incentive spirometry volumes (ICV) post-ESPB compared to pre-ESPB values. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of ESPB as an alternative method to the current standard of care at Stanford Health Care (SHC) for pain management in traumatic rib fractures. At the investigator's institution, the current standard of care is intravenous (IV) and enteral multimodal analgesia that consists primarily of opioids and a continuous IV lidocaine infusion. Although IV lidocaine has shown some benefit in improving post-surgical pain scores, evidence for its use in MRF is lacking. The purpose of this study is to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing outcomes in pain control and incentive spirometry volumes between continuous ESPB catheters and IV lidocaine infusions in adult patients with acute traumatic rib fractures. The investigators want to determine if ESPB can provide improved pain control in patients admitted for traumatic rib fractures compared to IV Lidocaine. The aim is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ESPB on OME consumption, pain scores, incentive spirometry volumes, cough strength, respiratory complications, inflammatory biomarkers and hospital LOS. Findings from this study can help improve analgesia, quality of care, and patient satisfaction at Stanford Healthcare and for other acute pain and trauma surgery providers. The aim of this study involves pain management for patients with acute traumatic rib fractures and therefore must involve human subjects.

Trial Details

Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2

160 Participants Needed

Cryoneurolysis for Rib Fractures

Palo Alto, California
The purpose of this research study is to examine the effectiveness of using the Iovera Smart Time 190, for ultrasound-guided cryoneurolysis, in trauma patients 18-64 years old with rib fractures that are not candidates for surgical stabilization. This will offer patients the benefits of cryoneurolysis of the intercostal nerves, thereby providing short and long term pain control while their ribs heal. The Iovera Smart Tip 190 is FDA approved for cryoneurolysis.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 64

40 Participants Needed

Cryoablation for Rib Fracture Pain Control

Palo Alto, California
The purpose of this study is to provide long-term pain control for elderly patients with rib fractures in order to minimize their risk of complications and return them to baseline functional capacity
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:65+

110 Participants Needed

Why Other Patients Applied

"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."

WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58

"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."

FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31

"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."

HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78

"I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."

ID
Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40

"I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."

ZS
Depression PatientAge: 51

Know someone looking for new options? Spread the word

Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials
How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Rib Fractures clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Rib Fractures clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Rib Fractures trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Rib Fractures is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Rib Fractures medical study?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Rib Fractures clinical trials?

Most recently, we added CINB + Medical Therapy for Rib Fractures, Cryoablation for Rib Fractures and Lidocaine IV vs. ESP Block for Rib Fractures to the Power online platform.

Popular Searches

By Condition

Depression Clinical Trials

Anxiety Clinical Trials

Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

ADHD Clinical Trials

Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

Autism Clinical Trials

Treatment Resistant Depression Clinical Trials

Borderline Personality Disorder Clinical Trials

Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials

Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

By Location

Clinical Trials in California

Clinical Trials in Florida

Clinical Trials in Texas

Clinical Trials in New York

Clinical Trials in Ohio

Clinical Trials in Illinois

Clinical Trials in Pennsylvania

Clinical Trials in Michigan

Clinical Trials in North Carolina

Clinical Trials in Massachusetts

Clinical Trials in Missouri

Clinical Trials in Minnesota

Other People Viewed

By Subject

Top Clinical Trials near Cocoa Beach, FL

189 Clinical Trials near Brandon, FL

Top Advanced Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials

Top Migraine Clinical Trials

10 Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Trials near Baltimore, MD

Top Polymyositis Clinical Trials

Top Clinical Trials near Edwardsville, IL

17 Multiple Sclerosis Trials near Knoxville, TN

Top Clinical Trials near Chicago Ridge, IL

Top Clinical Trials near Canton, IL

Top Clinical Trials near Jamestown, ND

135 Clinical Trials near Dyer, IN

By Trial

Radiosurgery for Brain Tumor

Language Intervention for Developmental Language Disorder

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Parents of Children With Food Allergies

[18F]F-AraG PET Imaging for Lung Cancer

Naltrexone/Bupropion for Obesity

TREO Stent-Graft for Aneurysm

SRP-9004 for Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy

BNT317 for Cancer

Nutrition Timing for Sleep Disruption in ICU Patients

CSF Analysis for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Exoskeleton for Parkinson's Disease

Church-Based Physical Activity Program for Physical Function Limitations

Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security
Match to a Trial