500 Participants Needed

Behavioral Intervention for PrEP Adherence in HIV Prevention

(P4W Trial)

Recruiting at 4 trial locations
KB
MM
Overseen ByMatthew Mimiaga, ScD MPH
Age: 18+
Sex: Male
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Brown University
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to determine if a new approach can help male sex workers consistently take PrEP, a medication that prevents HIV. It tests two methods: Stage 1 Strength Based Case Management (SBCM) offers guidance and motivation to start PrEP, while Stage 2 PrEPare for Work Intervention provides personal counseling and daily text reminders to maintain adherence. Men who have had condomless sex and exchanged sex for money or other items in the past three months may qualify if they are HIV-negative or unsure of their status. As an unphased trial, this study allows participants to contribute to innovative strategies that could improve PrEP adherence and HIV prevention.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for this trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It mainly focuses on participants not currently on PrEP and having no conditions that would prevent starting PrEP.

What prior data suggests that this behavioral intervention is safe for improving PrEP adherence?

Research has shown that strength-based case management (SBCM) is both effective and safe. One study found that this method successfully connected people to HIV care without causing significant side effects. Other studies indicate that SBCM helps people begin and continue using HIV prevention treatments, such as PrEP.

Regarding the PrEPare for Work program, PrEP itself has undergone extensive research and is considered safe. Many studies have demonstrated that PrEP significantly lowers the risk of HIV infection and is generally well-tolerated by most people. Reports of serious side effects are rare, making it a dependable preventive option.

Both approaches aim to help individuals manage their health more effectively, and existing research supports their safety.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about these interventions for improving PrEP adherence because they focus on personalized support and practical engagement strategies that go beyond standard informational approaches. The Strength Based Case Management (SBCM) approach offers tailored support by connecting individuals with trained case managers who motivate and guide them to access PrEP, making the process more accessible and supportive. Meanwhile, the PrEPare for Work intervention provides personalized counseling and daily text reminders to boost adherence, using technology to keep participants engaged and accountable. These methods aim to address the real-world challenges of sticking to a PrEP regimen, potentially leading to better adherence rates compared to traditional methods that primarily rely on informational pamphlets or standard care.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for improving PrEP adherence in HIV prevention?

Research has shown that Strength Based Case Management (SBCM), which participants in this trial may receive, effectively connects people to medical care, including HIV prevention services like PrEP. Studies have demonstrated that this approach increases HIV testing and links people to the healthcare resources they need.

In this trial, the PrEPare for Work program is another intervention being tested. Research on PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis) is strong, with its main ingredients, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, proving very effective in preventing HIV among men who have sex with men. Real-world evidence supports that using PrEP can greatly reduce new HIV cases. The PrEPare for Work program combines counseling and reminders to help people take PrEP regularly, maintaining its effectiveness.13467

Who Is on the Research Team?

KB

Katie Biello, PhD

Principal Investigator

Brown University School of Public Health

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for male sex workers over 18 who have had unprotected anal sex with men in the past 3 months, are HIV negative or unsure, not on PrEP, and can communicate in English or Spanish. They must also have exchanged sex for value within the same timeframe. Those with severe mental/physical conditions, on PrEP from a pilot study, or with health issues like chronic Hepatitis B cannot join.

Inclusion Criteria

I have had unprotected anal sex with a man in the last 3 months.
I identify as male.
Report HIV status as negative or unsure
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

Laboratory or clinical findings that would preclude PrEP initiation (e.g. Chronic Hepatitis B Virus infection, decreased creatinine clearance)
I am able to understand and consent to participate in the study.
I started PrEP as part of a pilot RCT.
See 1 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Stage 1 Treatment

Participants receive either standard of care or strength-based case management to facilitate PrEP initiation

2 months
1 visit (in-person) for randomization, ongoing support as needed

Stage 2 Treatment

Participants receive either standard of care or the PrEPare for Work intervention to optimize PrEP adherence

12 months
3 visits (in-person) for adherence sessions, ongoing support via text messaging

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for PrEP adherence and persistence

12 months
Follow-up visits every 4 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Stage 1 Strength Based Case Management (SBCM) Condition
  • Stage 2 PrEPare for Work Intervention Condition
Trial Overview 'PrEPare for Work' is an RCT aiming to see if a behavioral intervention helps improve uptake, adherence to, and persistence of PrEP among male sex workers. Participants will first receive Strength Based Case Management followed by the 'PrEPare for Work' intervention.
How Is the Trial Designed?
4Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Stage 2 PrEPare for Work Intervention ConditionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Stage 1 Strength Based Case Management (SBCM) ConditionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group III: Stage 1 Standard of Care (SOC) Control ConditionActive Control1 Intervention
Group IV: Stage 2 SOC Control ConditionActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Brown University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
480
Recruited
724,000+

The Miriam Hospital

Collaborator

Trials
252
Recruited
39,200+

University of California, Los Angeles

Collaborator

Trials
1,594
Recruited
10,430,000+

Project Weber/RENEW

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
500+

Open Door Health

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
500+

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Collaborator

Trials
623
Recruited
10,400,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a pilot study involving 61 adults interested in PrEP, those receiving strengths-based case management (SBCM) showed a higher rate of completing a provider visit (53.3%) compared to the control group (32.3%), suggesting that SBCM can effectively facilitate access to PrEP care.
Overall, 34% of participants initiated PrEP within 12 weeks, with no significant difference in the time to initiation between the SBCM and control groups, indicating that while SBCM helps with provider visits, it may not speed up the actual start of PrEP.
A Randomized Study of Passive versus Active PrEP Patient Navigation for a Heterogeneous Population at Risk for HIV in South Florida.Doblecki-Lewis, S., Butts, S., Botero, V., et al.[2020]
The iPrEx study showed that daily emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) is effective in reducing HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men, with adherence being crucial for its efficacy.
Qualitative insights from San Francisco participants revealed that strong adherence was supported by established routines, positive relationships with nonjudgmental healthcare staff, and client-centered counseling, while barriers included routine changes and side effects.
Participant experiences and facilitators and barriers to pill use among men who have sex with men in the iPrEx pre-exposure prophylaxis trial in San Francisco.Gilmore, HJ., Liu, A., Koester, KA., et al.[2021]
Understanding the behavioral and social-cultural factors influencing adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is crucial for maximizing its effectiveness in preventing HIV, as current research shows significant variability in product use across different trials.
There is a need for more comprehensive research to identify factors affecting PrEP uptake and adherence, as well as to develop strategies that support consistent use and regular HIV testing, which are essential for optimizing public health outcomes.
Adherence to preexposure chemoprophylaxis: the behavioral bridge from efficacy to effectiveness.Amico, KR.[2022]

Citations

Contingency Management and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis ...Among PWID, CM improves substance use outcomes, prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, and medication adherence. For some, CM alone may be an ...
Outcomes of a pilot randomized clinical trial testing brief ...Adapted SBCM approaches have shown efficacy in increasing HIV testing and linkage to medical care among people who use drugs in urban areas as ...
Contingency Management and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis ...We are conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of CM with, as indicated, PrEP Adherence Support Services (PASS) (CoMPASS) compared to ...
Adaptive Intervention Strategies for HIV PrEP Care in Rural ...During this 5-year study, stepped-care adaptive interventions will be deployed in three rural syringe service programs in a Sequential Multiple Assignment ...
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake, Adherence, and ...This narrative review examines the latest interventions and programs to improve all 3 stages of PrEP adherence and reviews ongoing studies to promote effective ...
A strengths-based case management intervention to link...The Linking Infectious and Narcology Care strengths-based case management intervention was more effective than usual care in linking Russian PWID to HIV care.
Optimal strategies to improve uptake of and adherence ...The primary outcomes were uptake and adherence to HIV prevention options over 24 months, measured by self-reported PrEP use and adherence, consistent condom use ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security