400 Participants Needed

GPS Clinical Intervention for Dementia

Recruiting at 2 trial locations
EK
LG
Overseen ByLine Guénette, Ph.D
Age: 65+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests a new model of care, called the GPS clinical intervention, to help seniors with cognitive issues, such as memory problems, manage their medications better at home. It aims to reduce unnecessary medications, maintain brain health, improve quality of life, and support independence. The care team, including nurses, pharmacists, and doctors, will collaborate closely with home care services to achieve these goals. Seniors who take prescription medications and are being evaluated for memory issues or have been diagnosed with a major neurocognitive disorder may be well-suited for this trial. As an unphased trial, this study offers a unique opportunity to contribute to innovative care solutions that could enhance independence and quality of life for seniors.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but it aims to optimize your medication use. It's best to discuss your specific situation with the trial team.

What prior data suggests that this model of care is safe for seniors with cognitive disorders?

Research has shown that the GPS clinical program for dementia aims to enhance the care seniors receive at home by improving communication among healthcare professionals and reducing unnecessary medications.

Regarding safety, specific data from studies on this program is not available. However, since the GPS program is not a new drug or treatment, it does not carry the side effects typically associated with medications.

The program emphasizes teamwork and information sharing among care teams, making it a low-risk option for seniors. Its goal is to maintain mental health and quality of life by enhancing care without introducing new risks.

Although specific safety data is lacking, the program's nature suggests it is well-tolerated. It is designed to improve life without adding new health concerns.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about the GPS clinical intervention for dementia because it offers a novel approach to patient care. Unlike traditional treatments that primarily focus on medication and cognitive therapies, the GPS intervention integrates technology to enhance the everyday management of dementia. By using GPS tracking, caregivers can better monitor and support patients, potentially improving safety and independence. This method could revolutionize how we manage dementia, offering a more personalized and proactive care strategy.

What evidence suggests that the GPS clinical intervention is effective for dementia?

Research has shown that collaboration among doctors, nurses, and pharmacists can benefit people with dementia by improving health outcomes and reducing costs. Studies have found that this teamwork simplifies medication management and enhances home care. In this trial, some participants will join the group exposed to the GPS clinical intervention, which involves such collaborative care. Family doctors, or general practitioners (GPs), play a crucial role in early dementia detection and ensuring appropriate patient care. By reducing unnecessary medications, this approach aims to protect brain health and enhance life quality for older adults. Overall, these methods have demonstrated positive effects on both patients and their caregivers.36789

Who Is on the Research Team?

LG

Line Guénette, Ph.D

Principal Investigator

CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Laval University

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for seniors aged 65 or older who have been diagnosed with cognitive impairment or major neurocognitive disorder (MCND) within the last year and are receiving home care. They must be referred to a memory clinic or pharmacist, taking prescription medications, and able to answer questionnaires in French without help.

Inclusion Criteria

Having been diagnosed with cognitive impairment within the last year
With MCND and followed up at home
You have been referred to a clinic that specializes in memory-related issues.
See 7 more

Exclusion Criteria

Seniors in palliative care
Unable to answer questionnaires in French without a caregiver.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Participants receive the GPS intervention aimed at optimizing pharmacotherapy and supporting autonomy

6 months
Regular visits with FMG team

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in quality of life, treatment burden, and medication use

6 months
2 visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • GPS clinical intervention
Trial Overview The GPS clinical intervention being tested aims to optimize medication use among seniors with MCND at home. It involves knowledge sharing sessions between nurses, pharmacists, doctors in Family Medicine Groups (FMGs), and collaboration with home care service teams.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Exposed FMGs to GPS interventionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Non exposed FMGs to GPS interventionActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Lead Sponsor

Trials
177
Recruited
110,000+

Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal

Collaborator

Trials
81
Recruited
6,400+

CISSS de Chaudière-Appalaches

Collaborator

Trials
9
Recruited
16,500+

CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal

Collaborator

Trials
4
Recruited
820+

Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec

Collaborator

Trials
84
Recruited
46,700+

Published Research Related to This Trial

The study found that the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Depression Indicators did not significantly change the pattern of referrals from primary care to dedicated dementia clinics, suggesting that the referral process remains largely unchanged.
A low proportion of patients referred for dementia evaluation actually receive a dementia diagnosis, with many potentially suffering from depressive disorders instead, highlighting the need for better differentiation between dementia and depression in primary care settings.
Have Quality and Outcomes Framework Depression Indicators changed referrals from primary care to a dedicated memory clinic?Fearn, S., Larner, AJ.[2021]
A study involving 102 French general practitioners revealed that their confidence and adherence to national recommendations significantly influence their practices in assessing and managing dementia.
Many GPs reported feeling less confident in providing information about dementia resources, and a common reason for underdiagnosis was the perceived limited effectiveness of available drug therapies, highlighting a need for improved training and support in dementia care.
Description of general practitioners' practices when suspecting cognitive impairment. Recourse to care in dementia (Recaredem) study.Harmand, MG., Meillon, C., Rullier, L., et al.[2019]
A survey of 129 GPs and 239 neurologists/psychiatrists in Germany revealed a generally positive attitude towards the care of dementia patients, with both groups valuing early diagnosis and the importance of social support for patients and caregivers.
Despite some differences in the use of cognitive tests and perceived competence in treatment, the overall approach to managing cognitively impaired patients was similar between GPs and specialists, indicating a unified front in dementia care.
[The management of dementia patients from the point of view of office-based general practitioners (GPs) and specialists--the results of an empirical investigation].Kaduszkiewicz, H., Wiese, B., van den Bussche, H.[2019]

Citations

Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative ...This study adds evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month collaborative care intervention for people living with ...
Effectiveness of a peer-mediated educational intervention ...GPs' detection and management of dementia have been addressed in several educational interventions with varying success. Large seminar-based ...
General practitioners' perspectives on lifestyle interventions ...General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in identifying cognitive impairment and dementia and providing post-diagnostic care.
Effectiveness of Interventions to Support Carers of People ...Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant medium-to-large intervention effects on three key carer outcomes—perceived burden, depression, ...
Cost-effectiveness of post-diagnosis treatment in dementia ...The study will provide an answer to whether follow-up of dementia patients can best be done in specialised outpatient memory clinics or in primary care ...
Implementing global positioning system trackers for people ...GPS trackers may reduce emotional distress and risk of physical harm by assisting family members to find relatives much quicker, reducing the ...
Ethical aspects of using GPS for tracking people with ...The lack of ethical consensus on the use of GPS for people with dementia underlines the need for clearer policies and practical guidelines.
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative ...People living with dementia receiving CDCM had significantly higher odds of taking antidementia drugs after 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] ...
Systematic Literature Review of Wandering Prevention ...A total of 12 studies were found to be eligible after screening, encompassing various aspects of dementia care technologies and their impact on wandering ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security