226 Participants Needed

Glaucoma Drainage Techniques for Glaucoma

(DECLARE Trial)

Recruiting at 7 trial locations
GY
Overseen ByGui-shuang Ying, PhD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Pennsylvania
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests two methods of placing glaucoma drainage devices in the eye to determine which causes less cell loss. It compares device placement in the anterior chamber (front part of the eye) versus the sulcus (a small space between the iris and the front chamber). People with medication-resistant glaucoma who need a drainage device may be suitable candidates. Participants will help identify the best approach to minimize damage while treating glaucoma. As an unphased trial, this study allows participants to contribute to innovative research that could enhance future glaucoma treatments.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What prior data suggests that these glaucoma drainage techniques are safe?

Research shows that both types of tube placement for glaucoma drainage—one in the front part of the eye (anterior chamber) and the other in a groove behind the iris (sulcus)—are generally safe. Most surgeons prefer placing the tube in the front part because they are more familiar with it and it is quicker. However, some risks exist. Studies indicate that after surgery, about 15% of patients may experience a temporary decrease in the fluid-filled space in the front of the eye, and about 10% may have low eye pressure that needs treatment.

Placing the tube in the groove behind the iris is a newer but promising method. It effectively reduces the pressure inside the eye with few complications. Some concerns include possible bleeding inside the eye and the need for a skilled surgeon to perform the procedure. However, research suggests that this method may cause less damage to the clear front surface of the eye (cornea) compared to the front placement.

For those considering joining a trial, both methods have been studied and are considered safe, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about these glaucoma drainage techniques because they explore two different tube placements for managing glaucoma, offering potential improvements over standard treatments like medications or traditional surgeries. The anterior chamber (AC) tube placement involves positioning the drainage tube directly into the front part of the eye, which might enhance fluid outflow and reduce eye pressure more effectively. Meanwhile, the sulcus tube placement targets the ciliary sulcus, a different part of the eye, which could offer a more tailored approach to managing fluid drainage and pressure control. By examining these distinct placements, researchers hope to discover more efficient and personalized options for reducing the pressure that harms the optic nerve in glaucoma patients.

What evidence suggests that these glaucoma drainage techniques are effective for minimizing cell loss?

This trial will compare two types of tube placements for glaucoma: one in the front part of the eye (anterior chamber) and the other in a groove behind the iris (sulcus). Research has shown that both methods effectively lower eye pressure and are generally safe. Participants in the anterior chamber tube placement arm may benefit from its high success rate; one study showed a 91% success rate over two years. Meanwhile, those in the sulcus tube placement arm may experience a success rate of 85.3% over the long term, with fewer issues affecting the cornea, the eye's clear outer layer. Overall, both methods are promising for managing glaucoma by effectively reducing eye pressure.16789

Who Is on the Research Team?

YH

Ying Han, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

University of California, San Francisco

JR

Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer, MD

Principal Investigator

Stanford University

TD

Thuy Doan, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

University of California San Fransicso

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 18 with medically uncontrolled glaucoma needing a Glaucoma Drainage Device (GDD) or GDD with phacoemulsification. Candidates must be suitable for GDD implantation in the ciliary sulcus and anterior chamber, able to consent, accept randomization, and attend scheduled visits.

Inclusion Criteria

I have glaucoma that needs surgery not controlled by medication.
I am a candidate for a specific eye implant surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

Presence of nanophthalmos, uncontrolled uveitis, silicone oil, Sturge-Weber syndrome or other conditions associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure
I had glaucoma surgery within the last 6 months.
Previous GDD implantation or Xen Gel Stent or placement of Cypass Micro-stent or Preserflo MicroShunt
See 5 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo glaucoma drainage device implantation with tube placement in either the anterior chamber or ciliary sulcus

1 day (surgery)
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, and other outcomes

24 months
Regular visits (in-person) over 24 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Anterior chamber (AC) tube placement
  • Sulcus tube placement
Trial Overview The DECLARE study compares two ways of placing a glaucoma drainage device: either in the front part of the eye (anterior chamber) or between the iris and front chamber (sulcus). The goal is to see which method better minimizes cell loss in the eye.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Anterior chamber (AC) tube placementActive Control1 Intervention
Group II: Sulcus tube placementActive Control1 Intervention

Anterior chamber (AC) tube placement is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Glaucoma Drainage Device for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Glaucoma Drainage Device for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Pennsylvania

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2,118
Recruited
45,270,000+

Stanford University

Collaborator

Trials
2,527
Recruited
17,430,000+

National Eye Institute (NEI)

Collaborator

Trials
572
Recruited
1,320,000+

University of California, San Francisco

Collaborator

Trials
2,636
Recruited
19,080,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 40 glaucoma patients who underwent glaucoma drainage device (GDD) insertion, the pars plana (PP) group showed a significantly lower medication burden compared to those with anterior chamber (AC) or sulcus GDDs, indicating better management of glaucoma symptoms post-surgery.
All three GDD locations (AC, sulcus, and PP) had similar success rates in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), and no significant differences in complication rates were observed after 3 months, suggesting that PP GDDs are a safe and effective option for glaucoma treatment.
Outcomes of Anterior Chamber, Sulcus, and Pars Plana Glaucoma Drainage Device Placement in Glaucoma Patients.Samuel, S., Chang, EK., Gupta, S., et al.[2022]
A new technique using a transcameral suture effectively corrected the position of a glaucoma drainage device tube that was touching the corneal endothelium, ensuring it was at a safe distance from both the cornea and iris.
This method proved to be safe, quick, and minimally invasive, with successful results maintained over a follow-up period of 20 months.
Transcameral suture to prevent tube-corneal touch after glaucoma drainage device implantation: a new surgical technique.Bochmann, F., Azuara-Blanco, A.[2021]
In a study of 105 patients, those who had glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) placed in the sulcus experienced significantly fewer complications, including lower rates of postoperative hyphaema and severe complications compared to those with devices placed in the anterior chamber.
Both groups achieved similar reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP), but the sulcus group required fewer medications during follow-up, indicating that sulcus placement is a safe and effective option for managing glaucoma.
Comparison of surgical outcomes between sulcus and anterior chamber implanted glaucoma drainage devices.Alobaida, IA., Malik, R., Ahmad, S.[2021]

Citations

Clinical and surgical outcomes of glaucoma drainage ...Our current study validates the findings of previous studies that tube implantation either in sulcus or anterior chamber provides comparable safety and efficacy ...
Outcomes of Anterior Chamber, Sulcus, and Pars Plana ...Patients with tube insertion in the PP were younger and had less severe glaucoma than patients with tube insertion in the AC or sulcus. The PP ...
Outcomes With Glaucoma Drainage DevicesA higher rate of complete success was achieved by the trabeculectomy group compared to the GDD group at 1 and 2 years (59% and 41% vs 13% and 11%, respectively; ...
A retrospective study of ten-year outcomes of glaucoma ...Complications occurred in 3.2%, which included macula edema, 1.8%, ptosis, exposed Glaucoma drainage device, dislocation of tube and ...
Long-term results of glaucoma drainage device surgeryThey reported a qualified success rate at 2 years of 94% for the pars plana group and of 91% for the anterior chamber group [15]. In our study ( ...
Outcomes of Anterior Chamber, Sulcus, and Pars Plana ...Patients with tube insertion in the PP were younger and had less severe glaucoma than patients with tube insertion in the AC or sulcus. The PP ...
Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation, Outcomes, and ...The cumulative rates of serious complications were 15.9% and 24.7% in the Ahmed and Baerveldt groups, respectively, which was statistically significantly higher ...
Survey of the American Glaucoma Society Membership ...Conclusion: Currently, most glaucoma surgeons favor AC tube placement due to its familiarity, efficiency, and perceived safety, despite ...
Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Low-Cost ...Postoperative complications included self-limited anterior chamber shallowing (14.9%), hypotony requiring an intracameral OVD injection (9.5%), tube shunt ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security