Your session is about to expire
← Back to Search
PACE-A: Prostatectomy vs prostate SBRT for Prostate Cancer (PACE Trial)
PACE Trial Summary
This trial is studying different treatment options for prostate cancer. It involves patients with low, intermediate, and high risk prostate cancer. The patients are divided into different groups based on their suitability for surgery as a
PACE Trial Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
You may be eligible if you check “Yes” for the criteria belowPACE Trial Timeline
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.PACE Trial Design
Find a Location
Who is running the clinical trial?
Frequently Asked Questions
At how many different venues can this clinical trial be accessed?
"This clinical trial is being conducted at 68 different sites worldwide, including notable locations such as Lakeridge Health in Oshawa, Western General in Edinburgh, and The Beatson in Glasgow. Additionally, there are several other participating locations across the globe."
Are there any ongoing opportunities for patients to participate in this medical trial?
"As per the information provided on clinicaltrials.gov, this particular clinical trial is not currently in the recruitment phase. Its initial posting dates back to August 7th, 2012 and it was last updated on January 18th, 2024. However, please note that there are currently 1315 other ongoing trials actively seeking participants at present."
Has the PACE-C study comparing conventionally fractionated radiation therapy to prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy received approval from the FDA?
"Based on our team's evaluation at Power, the safety of PACE-C: Conventionally Fractionated RT vs Prostate SBRT is rated as 3. This rating corresponds to it being a Phase 3 trial with evidence supporting its efficacy and multiple rounds of data confirming its safety."
What are the anticipated results that researchers hope to achieve through this experimental investigation?
"The primary objective of this clinical trial, which will be evaluated over a 2-year post-treatment period, is to determine the rate of freedom from biochemical or clinical failure in PACE-B and PACE-C. Secondary outcomes include assessing acute toxicity reported by clinicians using CTCAE and RTOG scales (for SBRT and conventional RT patients) or Clavien scale (for surgical patients), evaluating late toxicity reported by clinicians based on CTCAE and RTOG criteria (only for SBRT and conventional RT patients), and determining the rate of freedom from biochemical or clinical failure specifically in PACE-A. Biochemical progression is defined"
Share this study with friends
Copy Link
Messenger