Your session is about to expire
← Back to Search
MBG453 for Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Study Summary
This trial is looking at whether or not MBG-453 is effective in treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
Timeline
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.Trial Design
Find a Location
Who is running the clinical trial?
Frequently Asked Questions
Are there still available slots for individuals to participate in the trial?
"Unfortunately, the trial is not currently open to new patients. Initially shared on September 1st 2021 and last updated March 28th of this year, no more participants are being accepted at present. Nevertheless, 432 clinical trials for myelodysplastic syndromes as well as 12 studies pertaining to MBG453 remain active and eager for volunteers."
How many people are part of this medical research experiment?
"This research project is not currently open for participation. The protocol was initially posted on September 1st 2021 and last edited on March 28th 2021. Those looking to participate in other studies may be interested to know that 432 clinical trials are actively admitting patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, and there are 12 trails for MBG453 enrolling participants at this time."
Does this investigation represent an unprecedented research endeavor?
"Since 2017, MBG453 has been subject to an array of clinical investigations. Its first trial was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and included 243 respondents. Following its success, it earned approval in Phase 1 drug trials; at present there are 12 active studies involving 133 cities across 42 countries."
Have prior research projects included MBG453?
"Presently, 12 investigations into MBG453 have been initiated with 1 trial at Phase 3. Toon-city in Ehime hosts the most clinical trials for MBG453 yet there are 379 other sites worldwide also exploring its properties."
How have the safety assessments of MBG453 been evaluated?
"MBG453's safety has been partially established, leading to a rating of 2. This is because the drug is currently undergoing Phase 2 trials and there exists some evidence for its security but none that confirms efficacy."
Share this study with friends
Copy Link
Messenger