120 Participants Needed

Scp776 for Stroke

(ARPEGGIO Trial)

Recruiting at 14 trial locations
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Neuroprotective Capacity of Scp776 in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for this trial?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but you cannot participate if you are taking a chronic anticoagulant like warfarin or apixaban.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

If you are taking a chronic anticoagulant (blood thinner), you may need to stop unless certain conditions are met. However, chronic use of anti-platelet drugs is allowed. The trial protocol does not specify other medication restrictions.

What data supports the idea that Scp776 for Stroke is an effective treatment?

The available research does not provide specific data supporting the effectiveness of Scp776 for Stroke as a treatment. Instead, it mentions various studies comparing other treatments like acupuncture, L-DOPA, and NeuroAiD to placebos. These studies focus on different therapies and drugs for stroke recovery, but none specifically highlight Scp776 as an effective option. Therefore, there is no direct evidence from the provided information that Scp776 is effective for stroke treatment.12345

What safety data exists for the treatment SCP-776 for stroke?

The provided research does not mention SCP-776 or any of its alternative names directly. However, it discusses the safety of GV150526, a glycine antagonist at the NMDA receptor complex, in acute stroke patients. GV150526 was generally well tolerated in early human studies, with some patients experiencing asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia, leading to a reduction in the maintenance dose during the trial. The study concluded that GV150526 was generally well tolerated, justifying further formal efficacy studies.678910

Is the treatment Scp776 for Stroke, and the treatment Placebo, scp776 (also known as: Control, Dummy Treatment, SCP-776) a promising treatment?

Based on the information provided, there is no evidence to suggest that Scp776, also known as Control, Dummy Treatment, or SCP-776, is a promising treatment for stroke. The relevant research articles do not mention Scp776 or provide any data supporting its effectiveness for stroke treatment.1112131415

How is the drug SCP-776 different from other stroke treatments?

The clinical trial for SCP-776 is unique because it involves a placebo-controlled study, which helps determine the drug's effectiveness compared to no active treatment. This approach is crucial for understanding the true impact of SCP-776 on stroke recovery.1112131415

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults over 18 with a body weight under 150 kg who are experiencing a severe, disabling stroke and are set to undergo endovascular thrombectomy. They must have had symptoms start within the last 16 hours and not be on certain blood thinners or have conditions that could interfere with the study.

Inclusion Criteria

The time between when you last felt well and when you join the study is less than 16 hours.
I am 18 years old or older.
My body weight is under 150 kg.
See 4 more

Exclusion Criteria

I am on long-term blood thinners like warfarin or apixaban.
I have end-stage kidney disease.
I do not have arterial conditions like aortic dissection or carotid stent that would interfere with blood flow restoration.
See 12 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment Part A

Sequential dose escalation with scp776 or placebo in 3 cohorts

7 days
Daily visits for 7 days

Treatment Part B

Dose expansion with chosen scp776 therapeutic dose or placebo

7 days
Daily visits for 7 days

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

90 days
Visits at Day 30 and Day 90

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Placebo
  • scp776
Trial OverviewThe study tests Scp776 at two different doses (1.9 mg/kg and 3.8 mg/kg) against a placebo in patients having an acute ischemic stroke to see if it's safe and can protect brain cells. It's randomized, meaning participants are put into groups by chance, double-blind so neither doctors nor patients know who gets what treatment.
Participant Groups
4Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Placebo Group
Group I: scp776 (4.8 mg/kg)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
Cohort 3 dose regimen: Intravenous (IV) injection(s) over 2 minutes - 4.8 mg/kg
Group II: scp776 (3.8 mg/kg)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
Cohort 2 dose regimen: Intravenous (IV) injection(s) over 2 minutes - 3.8 mg/kg
Group III: scp776 (1.9 mg/kg)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
Cohort 1 dose regimen: Intravenous (IV) injection(s) over 2 minutes - 1.9 mg/kg
Group IV: PlaceboPlacebo Group1 Intervention
Volume Matched Placebo (normal saline)

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Silver Creek Pharmaceuticals

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1
Recruited
80+

Findings from Research

Among 178 studies analyzed, six experimental training programs (ETPs) were found to significantly improve upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients, including constraint-induced movement therapy and mirror therapy, with effect sizes indicating moderate to strong benefits.
For lower extremity recovery, six ETPs, such as body-weight-supported treadmill training and caregiver-mediated training, also showed significant effectiveness; however, none of the ETPs demonstrated superiority over conventional training programs, suggesting that while they are beneficial, they may not be better than standard rehabilitation methods.
Effectiveness and Superiority of Rehabilitative Treatments in Enhancing Motor Recovery Within 6 Months Poststroke: A Systemic Review.Lin, IH., Tsai, HT., Wang, CY., et al.[2019]
In a pilot study involving 10 chronic stroke patients, a 5-week treatment with L-DOPA significantly improved walking speed and manual dexterity, indicating its potential efficacy in enhancing motor recovery.
The treatment also lengthened the cortical silent period in the affected hemisphere, suggesting that L-DOPA may help modulate motor cortical excitability, which could be important for recovery after a stroke.
Long-term levodopa administration in chronic stroke patients. A clinical and neurophysiologic single-blind placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study.Acler, M., Fiaschi, A., Manganotti, P.[2022]
In a study involving 18 participants with low-back pain, both active chiropractic adjustments and sham treatments led to improvements in pain and well-being, but active treatments generally resulted in greater benefits.
Interestingly, 57% of participants who received the sham treatment believed it had a positive effect, highlighting the potential for placebo effects in chiropractic care and the importance of blinding in clinical trials.
Preliminary study of the effects of a placebo chiropractic treatment with sham adjustments.Hawk, C., Azad, A., Phongphua, C., et al.[2019]

References

Effectiveness and Superiority of Rehabilitative Treatments in Enhancing Motor Recovery Within 6 Months Poststroke: A Systemic Review. [2019]
Long-term levodopa administration in chronic stroke patients. A clinical and neurophysiologic single-blind placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study. [2022]
Preliminary study of the effects of a placebo chiropractic treatment with sham adjustments. [2019]
Evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture in defined aspects of stroke recovery: a randomised, placebo controlled single blind study. [2021]
Chinese medicine NeuroAiD efficacy stroke recovery-extension study (CHIMES-E study): an observational multicenter study to investigate the longer-term efficacy of NeuroAiD in stroke recovery. [2013]
New pathways for evaluating potential acute stroke therapies. [2008]
Phase II studies of the glycine antagonist GV150526 in acute stroke : the North American experience. The North American Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection (GAIN) Investigators. [2019]
Focal ischemia enhances the adverse effect potential of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in rats. [2019]
Glycine antagonist (GV150526) in acute stroke: a multicentre, double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial. [2022]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Baseline characteristics and treatment response of patients from the Philippines in the CHIMES study. [2014]
Studies of Org 10172 in patients with acute ischemic stroke. TOAST Study Group. [2018]
Validating a new non-penetrating sham acupuncture device: two randomised controlled trials. [2022]
Scalp acupuncture effects of stroke studied with magnetic resonance imaging: different actions in the two stroke model rats. [2009]
Reproduction of scalp acupuncture therapy on strokes in the model rats, spontaneous hypertensive rats-stroke prone (SHR-SP). [2019]
15.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Safety and Efficacy of MLC601 in Iranian Patients after Stroke: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. [2022]