Condition
Suggested Conditions
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Weight Loss
- Heart Disease
- Cancer
- Asthma
Location
Search Clinical Trials
Conditions
Locations
Treatment Type
Trial Phase
Trial Status
Paid Participation
40 Parkinson's Disease Trials near Indiana
Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Parkinson's Disease patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.
Learn More About PowerABBV-951 for Parkinson's Disease
Indianapolis, Indiana
This trial is testing a new drug called ABBV-951 for adults with advanced Parkinson's disease. The drug is given in a way to help control symptoms. Participants will be monitored through periodic check-ins to ensure the drug's safety and effectiveness.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:30+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Completed M15-741, Others
Must Be Taking:ABBV-951
130 Participants Needed
Airway Protection Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease
West Lafayette, Indiana
Airway protective disorders are a prevalent and progressive consequence of Parkinson's Disease (PD), and often result in aspiration pneumonia which is the leading cause of death in PD. Despite this, a large number of patients with PD do not access specialized services to address these critical deficits. The investigators will examine the comparative effectiveness of a novel treatment paradigm delivered in-person versus via telehealth in persons with PD, as well as the role of patient burden and treatment adherence on outcomes; thus, the proposed research is relevant to public health and in line with NIH's mission to identify novel, efficacious, and accessible rehabilitation strategies for short- and long-term improvement of dysfunctional airway protection in PD.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:50 - 90
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Other Neurological Disorders, Breathing Disorders, Smoking, Others
120 Participants Needed
TB006 for Parkinson's Disease
Indianapolis, Indiana
The primary objectives of this study are to assess the efficacy of TB006 in improving motor function and to assess the safety of TB006 in participants with Parkinson's Disease (PD).
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:50 - 80
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Severe Psychiatric Disorders, Cancer, Others
Must Be Taking:Levodopa-carbidopa
62 Participants Needed
NE3107 for Parkinson's Disease
Evansville, Illinois
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if bezisterim can treat movement symptoms of Parkinson's disease in patients that are 45 to 80 years old, in generally good physical and mental health, and are nearing the need for treatment to relieve their symptoms but have not yet been prescribed any form of levodopa or drug with similar activity. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Will bezisterim decrease movement symptoms of Parkinson's disease?
* What medical problems do participants have when taking bezisterim?
Researchers will compare the effects of bezisterim treatment to placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if bezisterim works to treat movement symptoms of Parkinson's disease.
Participants will
* have a physical examination that includes an electrocardiogram
* take drug or placebo twice daily for four months
* visit a clinical site or receive an at home visit seven times over the course of five months
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:45 - 80
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Major Mental, Physical Illness, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Levodopa
60 Participants Needed
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
Louisville, Kentucky
This study explores the use of multifunctional, non-invasive spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) to address axial motor symptoms, particularly gait dysfunction, in Parkinson's disease (PD). These symptoms, resistant to levodopa and inadequately managed by deep brain stimulation (DBS), arise from maladaptive spinal network changes. A non-invasive approach like scTS could overcome limitations associated with invasive spinal cord stimulation (SCS), which requires surgical implantation and lacks adaptability in stimulation site adjustments.
Gait dysfunction in PD stems from disrupted interactions between spinal and supraspinal networks. scTS provides a non-invasive alternative, shown to enhance locomotor functions in conditions such as spinal cord injury, stroke, and cerebral palsy. This study hypothesizes that scTS applied at multiple spinal levels-cervical (C3-C4), thoracic (T11-T12), and lumbar (L1, L2-L3)-can synergistically activate locomotor central pattern generators (CPGs) and improve gait and postural control in PD. Additionally, it is hypothesized that proprioceptive input, combined with scTS, can counteract disruptions in spinal networks and restore voluntary movement.
The primary goal is to evaluate the effects of scTS on stepping performance, postural control, and locomotor recovery in PD. Specific objectives include:
1. Enhancing Locomotor Networks
* Determine optimal scTS parameters for inducing rhythmic stepping in PD patients.
* Assess interactions between spinal and supraspinal networks during imagined stepping under scTS in a gravity-neutral setting.
2. Improving Postural Networks
o Evaluate the effectiveness of scTS in restoring postural control and integrating postural-locomotor functions.
3. Facilitating Neuroplasticity for Movement Recovery o Combine scTS with activity-based recovery training to promote adaptive plasticity in spinal and cortical networks, reducing freezing of gait (FOG).
The research will measure scTS's capacity to generate coordinated stepping and postural movements, integrate proprioceptive feedback, and induce long-term improvements in gait parameters. By targeting spinal locomotor and postural systems, scTS offers a novel, non-invasive approach to addressing gaps in the management of PD gait dysfunction. This work has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of life for individuals with PD, providing a safe, adaptable, and patient-centered therapeutic solution.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cognitive Dysfunction, Depression, Cardiac Insufficiency, Others
20 Participants Needed
Robotic Gait Training for Parkinson's Disease
Indianapolis, Indiana
The purpose of this study is to investigate the implementation of a novel gait rehabilitation stimulus (G-EO System) that could advance current clinical practices. The goal is to establish the safety and feasibility of gait training using the G-EO System as well as investigating the impact on mobility, function, quality of life, and participatory outcomes.
Research Design: We propose a single-blinded, randomized trial of electromechanically-assisted gait training using the G-EO System in patients with Parkinson's disease with gait disability.
Specific Aim 1 will establish the safety and feasibility of gait training using the G-EO System.
Specific Aim 2 will determine the efficacy of gait training using the G-EO System for improving mobility, function, and quality of life
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Severe Dyskinesia, Unstable Medication, Others
30 Participants Needed
Genetic Registry for Parkinson's Disease
Indianapolis, Indiana
Development of a central repository for PD-related genomic data for future research.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders, Hematologic Malignancies, Others
25000 Participants Needed
UCB0022 for Parkinson's Disease
Louisville, Kentucky
This trial is testing UCB0022, a new medication, to see if it can help people with advanced Parkinson's Disease. It is added to their regular treatments to see if it reduces the time they spend with bad symptoms. The goal is to make their usual treatments work better.
Stay on current meds
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:35 - 85
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
207 Participants Needed
Wearable Biofeedback for Swallowing Disorders
West Lafayette, Indiana
Dysphagia, or difficulty swallowing, is a common symptom of many neurological diseases but its treatment is not well established or easily accessible.
To start addressing this gap, the researchers developed and validated a cost-effective wearable surface electromyography (sEMG) biofeedback sensor technology (i-Phagia), optimized to record muscle activity from the head/neck and provide biofeedback to patients and adherence data to clinicians during swallow therapy. This system has been developed with commercially available and widely used materials and the Purdue University IRB has determined that the device is non-significant risk device.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if this biofeedback (using this new technology/i-Phagia) when used as an adjunct to a standard swallow therapy protocol works to improve swallowing function in patients post chronic stroke or diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. It will also help the investigators learn whether this therapy protocol is equally effective when provided in-person versus via telehealth. Finally, it will determine which patient factors may influence how well the treatment works.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does biofeedback (using this new technology/i-Phagia) when used as an adjunct to a standard swallow therapy protocol works better than a standard of care treatment to improve swallowing function in patients post chronic stroke or diagnosed with Parkinson's disease?
* Is completing the swallow therapy protocol at home (via telehealth) as effective as completing it in-person (in the clinic)?
* What factors related to the patients (e.g., age, diagnosis, etc.) may influence how well the treatment works?
Participants will:
* Complete a 12-week swallow treatment protocol (12 treatment visits) either in-person or at home (via telehealth)
* Complete 3 in-person evaluations (pre-treatment; post-treatment; and at a 12-week post treatment follow-up time point)
* Exercise at home several days per week and keep a diary/log of their home exercise
The hypothesis is that upon study completion, the efficacy of sEMG biofeedback-facilitated swallow therapy for both in-person and telehealth service delivery in two neurogenic dysphagia populations will have been established, and variables determining response to treatment will begin to be identified.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50 - 90
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Recent Pneumonia, Head/neck Surgery, Others
120 Participants Needed
Decision Making Support for Parkinson's Disease
West Lafayette, Indiana
Persons with Parkinson's disease and family care partners are often unprepared to make difficult, future medical decisions. Earlier conversations about future medical decisions between persons with Parkinson's disease and family care partners are needed before communication and cognitive difficulties become severe. In this study, the investigators will pilot test a novel dyadic intervention to help persons with Parkinson's disease and family care partners make future medical decisions. The investigators hypothesize the intervention will be feasible and acceptable among persons with Parkinson's disease and family care partners.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
72 Participants Needed
Sacituzumab Tirumotecan for Breast Cancer
Indianapolis, Indiana
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat types of breast cancer that are both:
* High-risk, which means the cancer may have a higher chance of getting worse or coming back after treatment
* Early-stage, which means the cancer is in the breast or the lymph nodes around the breast The 2 types of breast cancer in this study are triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR)-low positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative breast cancer. These cancers have zero or a low amount of a protein called HER2 and other proteins that attach to the hormones estrogen or progesterone.
Sacituzumab tirumotecan (also known as sac-TMT or MK-2870), the study medicine, is a type of targeted therapy. A targeted therapy is a treatment that works to control how specific types of cancer cells grow and spread.
The main goals of this study are to learn if people who receive sac-TMT, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy:
* Have fewer cancer cells found in the tumors and lymph nodes removed during surgery compared to those who receive only pembrolizumab and chemotherapy
* Live longer without the cancer growing, spreading, or coming back compared to people who receive only pembrolizumab with chemotherapy
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Metastatic Cancer, Prior Treatment, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Anti-PD-1, Anti-PD-L1
2400 Participants Needed
Sacituzumab Tirumotecan + Pembrolizumab for Endometrial Cancer
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat people with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) endometrial cancer (EC) that is advanced or recurrent.
* EC is a type of cancer that starts in the tissues inside the uterus (womb)
* pMMR indicates that certain normal proteins are present in the cancer cells
* Advanced means the cancer has spread locally or to other parts of the body (metastatic) and cannot be removed with surgery
* Recurrent means the cancer came back after surgery
Sacituzumab tirumotecan (also known as sac-TMT) and pembrolizumab are the study medicines. Sac-TMT is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC). An ADC attaches to specific targets on cancer cells and delivers treatment to destroy those cells.
The goal of this study is to learn if people who receive sac-TMT with pembrolizumab live longer and without the cancer getting worse compared to people who receive pembrolizumab alone.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Sarcomas, DMMR, Cardiovascular, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Immunosuppressants, T-cell Inhibitors
1123 Participants Needed
Sacituzumab Tirumotecan + Pembrolizumab for Lung Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky
The primary objective of the study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan combined with pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone with respect to overall survival (OS). The primary hypothesis is that the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and pembrolizumab is superior to pembrolizumab alone with respect to OS.
All participants who have completed the first course of pembrolizumab may be eligible for up to an additional 9 cycles of pembrolizumab monotherapy if there is blinded independent central review (BICR)-verified progressive disease by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) after initial treatment.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Small Cell Lung Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, CNS Metastases, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Immunosuppressants, Corticosteroids
614 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab/Vibostolimab + Chemoradiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Indianapolis, Indiana
This trial tests a combination of two drugs, pembrolizumab and vibostolimab, along with standard chemotherapy and radiation in patients with advanced lung cancer that cannot be surgically removed. The goal is to see if this combination can better control the disease and improve survival compared to another drug, durvalumab. These drugs help the immune system attack cancer cells more effectively.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:SCLC, Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Steroids, Immunosuppressants, NSAIDs, Others
611 Participants Needed
Belzutifan + Pembrolizumab for Kidney Cancer
Fort Wayne, Indiana
This trial is testing a new treatment in patients who have had kidney cancer surgery. The goal is to see if this treatment can prevent the cancer from coming back. One part of the treatment stops cancer cells from surviving in low oxygen, and the other part helps the immune system attack the cancer. This approach has shown improved survival rates in treating advanced kidney cancer.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cardiovascular Disease, Brain Metastases, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Steroids, Immunosuppressive Drugs
1800 Participants Needed
Immunotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer
Indianapolis, Indiana
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) compared to a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel in women with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma who have not previously been treated with prior systemic chemotherapy.
The primary study hypotheses are that pembrolizumab is superior to the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel with respect to Progression Free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and Overall Survival (OS).
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Immunodeficiency, Active Infection, Autoimmune, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Immunosuppressants, Steroids, Anti-PD-1
280 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab + Paclitaxel +/- Bevacizumab for Ovarian Cancer
Fort Wayne, Indiana
The primary objective is to compare pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 as assessed by the investigator. The hypotheses are that pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab is superior to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator for participants with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive tumors (Combined Positive Score \[CPS\] ≥1) and that pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab is superior to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator for all participants.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Immunodeficiency, CNS Metastases, Autoimmune, Others
Must Be Taking:Paclitaxel, Bevacizumab
643 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib + Chemo for Esophageal Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky
This trial tests a new combination of drugs and chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. It targets patients whose cancer has spread and who need effective first-line treatment. The treatment works by enhancing the immune system, blocking cancer growth, and killing cancer cells.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Previous Therapy, Adenocarcinoma, CNS Metastases, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Steroids, Immunosuppressants
863 Participants Needed
Enfortumab Vedotin + Pembrolizumab for Bladder Cancer
Indianapolis, Indiana
The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared with the current standard of care (neoadjuvant chemotherapy \[gemcitabine plus cisplatin\] and RC + PLND) for participants with MIBC who are cisplatin-eligible. The primary hypothesis is perioperative EV and pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior event free survival (EFS) compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine + cisplatin and RC + PLND (Arm B).
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Metastatic Disease, HIV, Hepatitis, Others
Must Not Be Taking:PD-1 Inhibitors
808 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy/Radiotherapy for Endometrial Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky
The purpose of this study is to compare pembrolizumab + adjuvant chemotherapy with placebo + adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) as assessed radiographically by the investigator or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease recurrence, and with respect to overall survival (OS). The primary hypotheses are that pembrolizumab + adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to placebo + adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, with respect to DFS as assessed radiographically by the investigator or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease recurrence, and with respect to OS.
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Recurrent Cancer, Autoimmune Disease, HIV, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Immunosuppressants, Steroids, PD-1 Inhibitors
990 Participants Needed
Why Other Patients Applied
"My dad was in a research group for Parkinson's for about 6 years, which was very interesting. I was just diagnosed 1.5 years ago, and started on low dose Sinemet. Doing well on Sinemet, but I'd like to get ahead of the condition. I'm excited about participating in research. "
LN
Parkinson's PatientAge: 74
"I have 5 kids. I'll do anything I can to slow this disease down in hopes that I can stay active with them into their adulthood. I also feel I am serving the greater good for all those who suffer from Parkinson's. Since I'm self employed, my schedule is flexible. "
UR
Parkinson's PatientAge: 53
"I wasn’t diagnosed until February, but I showed symptoms over ten years before. I want to help find a cure. I have lost family members to Parkinson’s and want to contribute to the search for better treatments before my children possibly come down with it."
YX
Parkinson's PatientAge: 61
"It seems my Parkinson’s is progressing more rapidly now. And my meds are lagging behind. My off time is more frequent and the episodes are longer. Trying to figure out what my options are."
TM
Parkinson's PatientAge: 58
"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."
WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58
Chemoradiation + Pembrolizumab/Olaparib for Small Cell Lung Cancer
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC), a type of lung cancer that has not spread from the lung to other parts of the body. The purpose of this study is to learn if pembrolizumab and olaparib, when given with chemotherapy and radiation treatment (CRT), can be effective in treating LS-SCLC. The researchers want to know if participants who receive CRT and pembrolizumab, with or without olaparib, have a longer overall survival compared to participants who only receive CRT.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:MDS/AML, Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Anti-PD-1, PARP Inhibitors
672 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab + Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
Fort Wayne, Indiana
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared to placebo plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in participants with locally advanced cervical cancer.
The primary hypotheses are that pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy is superior to placebo plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with respect to progression-free survival and overall survival.
Once the study objectives have been met or the study has ended, participants will be discontinued from this study and will be enrolled in an extension study to continue protocol-defined assessments and treatment.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Hysterectomy, Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Immunostimulatory Agents, Steroids
1060 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab for Liver Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and complete radiological response after surgical resection or local ablation. The primary hypotheses of this study are that adjuvant pembrolizumab is superior to placebo with respect to: 1) recurrence-free survival (RFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR); and 2) overall survival (OS).
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Active Infection, HIV, Autoimmune, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Antineoplastics, Immunotherapy, Steroids, Others
959 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab + Enzalutamide for Prostate Cancer
Merrillville, Indiana
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and enzalutamide in the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have not received chemotherapy for mCRPC, are abiraterone-naïve, or are intolerant to or progressed on abiraterone acetate. There are two primary study hypotheses.
Hypothesis 1: The combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide with respect to Overall Survival (OS).
Hypothesis 2: The combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide with respect to Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Sex:Male
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Active Malignancy, Autoimmune Disease, Immunodeficiency, Others
Must Be Taking:Androgen Deprivation
1244 Participants Needed
Sacituzumab + Enfortumab With/Without Pembrolizumab for Bladder Cancer
Indianapolis, Indiana
This study is a substudy being conducted under one pembrolizumab umbrella master study KEYMAKER-U04. The substudy will consist of 2 parts. Part 1 will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of sacituzumab tirumotecan plus enfortumab vedotin (EV). Part 2 will be based on Part 1 results and will evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of sacituzumab tirumotecan plus EV in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with advanced urothelial carcinoma.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1, 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Active Cancer, CNS Metastases, Cardiovascular Disease, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Immunosuppressants, Steroids, Live Vaccines, Others
38 Participants Needed
Sacituzumab + Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky
This is a phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label umbrella platform study that will evaluate the safety and tolerability of sacituzumab tirumotecan with pembrolizumab and fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy for the first-line (1L) treatment of participants with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal adenocarcinoma.
This substudy will have two phases: a safety lead-in phase and an efficacy phase. The safety lead-in phase will be used to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and to establish a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for sacituzumab tirumotecan in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. There is no formal hypothesis in this study.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1, 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Squamous Cell Cancer, Severe Dry Eye, Cardiovascular Disease, CNS Metastases, Others
Must Not Be Taking:CYP3A4 Inducers/inhibitors, Immunosuppressants
130 Participants Needed
Combination Therapies for Esophageal Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky
This is a phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label umbrella platform study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of sacituzumab tirumotecan (MK-2870) plus paclitaxel versus ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, for the treatment of participants with advanced or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, or esophageal adenocarcinoma who have failed 1 prior line of therapy. This is an estimation study, and no formal hypothesis testing will be performed.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1, 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Squamous Cancer, Severe Dry Eye, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Anticoagulants, NSAIDs, Antiplatelets, Others
90 Participants Needed
MK-0472 + Pembrolizumab for Advanced Cancer
Louisville, Kentucky
This trial is testing a new drug called MK-0472, alone and with other drugs, in patients with advanced or spreading solid tumors. The goal is to see if it is safe and effective in treating these cancers.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Second Malignancy, Hypercalcemia, Glaucoma, Cardiovascular Disease, Autoimmune Disease, Others
Must Be Taking:Antiretrovirals, HBV Antivirals
178 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab + Olaparib/Pemetrexed for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Merrillville, Indiana
This trial is comparing two treatment combinations for a specific type of lung cancer. It aims to find out which combination helps patients live longer and keeps their cancer from getting worse. The treatments work by boosting the immune system, making it harder for cancer cells to repair themselves, or stopping their growth.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Squamous NSCLC, CNS Metastases, Autoimmune, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Steroids, PARP Inhibitors
1003 Participants Needed
Pembrolizumab + Chemoradiation +/- Olaparib for Stage III Lung Cancer
Lafayette, Indiana
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in combination with concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by either pembrolizumab with olaparib placebo (Arm 1) or with olaparib (Arm 2) compared to concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by durvalumab (Arm 3) in participants with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC. Arms 1 and 2 will be studied in a double-blind design and Arm 3 will be open-label. The primary hypotheses are:
1. Pembrolizumab with concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by pembrolizumab with olaparib is superior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by durvalumab with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)
2. Pembrolizumab with concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by pembrolizumab is superior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by durvalumab with respect to PFS and OS
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Small Cell Lung Cancer, MDS/AML, Others
Must Not Be Taking:CYP3A4 Inducers, CYP3A4 Inhibitors
870 Participants Needed
Know someone looking for new options?
Spread the word
Learn More About Power
We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.
Bask GillCEO at Power
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do Parkinson's Disease clinical trials in Indiana pay?
Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.
How do Parkinson's Disease clinical trials in Indiana work?
After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Parkinson's Disease trials in Indiana 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length in Indiana for Parkinson's Disease is 12 months.
How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?
Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility in Indiana several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.
What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?
The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.
Do I need to be insured to participate in a Parkinson's Disease medical study in Indiana?
Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.
What are the newest Parkinson's Disease clinical trials in Indiana?
Most recently, we added Wearable Biofeedback for Swallowing Disorders, Sacituzumab Tirumotecan for Breast Cancer and Sacituzumab Tirumotecan + Pembrolizumab for Endometrial Cancer to the Power online platform.
Popular Searches
By Condition
By Location
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.