Condition
Suggested Conditions
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Weight Loss
- Heart Disease
- Cancer
- Asthma
Location
Search Clinical Trials
Conditions
Locations
Treatment Type
Trial Phase
Trial Status
Paid Participation
80 Leukemia Trials near Kentucky
Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Leukemia patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.
Learn More About PowerIvosidenib + Azacitidine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Louisville, Kentucky
This trial is testing a new oral drug, ivosidenib, combined with an injectable drug, azacitidine. It targets adults with a specific type of untreated leukemia who can't undergo intensive treatments. Ivosidenib blocks a faulty enzyme in cancer cells, and azacitidine stops these cells from growing.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Prior AML Treatment, Active Infection, Others
Must Be Taking:Azacitidine
146 Participants Needed
Bortezomib + Sorafenib for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
This randomized phase III trial studies how well bortezomib and sorafenib tosylate work in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Bortezomib and sorafenib tosylate may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving bortezomib and sorafenib tosylate together with combination chemotherapy may be an effective treatment for acute myeloid leukemia.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:< 29
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Fanconi Anemia, Concurrent Malignancy, Pregnancy, Others
1645 Participants Needed
LP-168 + Obinutuzumab for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
Multicenter Parallel 2 Cohort Phase 2 Study of LP-168 and Obinutuzumab for Previously Treated, and T474 Gatekeeper Mutant Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and Variants of This.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Richter's Transformation, Cardiovascular Disease, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Anticoagulants, Steroids, CYP3A4 Inhibitors
34 Participants Needed
SNDX-5613 for Acute Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
Phase 1 dose escalation will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of revumenib in participants with acute leukemia.
In Phase 2, participants will be enrolled in 3 indication-specific expansion cohorts to determine the efficacy, short- and long-term safety, and tolerability of revumenib.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1, 2
Age:30+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia, HIV, Hepatitis, Others
Must Be Taking:CYP3A4 Inhibitors
413 Participants Needed
Inotuzumab + Blinatumomab for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
This phase II trial studies how well inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab work in treating patients with CD22-positive B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is newly diagnosed, has come back, or does not respond to treatment. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CNS Leukemia, Cardiac Disease, Liver Disease, Neurologic Disorder, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Antidepressants, Antipsychotics
64 Participants Needed
Azacitidine + Gemtuzumab for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Mount Vernon, Illinois
This phase II trial is studying the side effects of giving azacitidine together with gemtuzumab ozogamicin to see how well it works in treating older patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as azacitidine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Azacitidine may also stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies, such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Giving azacitidine together with gemtuzumab ozogamicin may kill more cancer cells.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:60+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CNS Involvement, Prior Malignancy, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Azacitidine, Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin
133 Participants Needed
ONO-7018 for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Chronic B-Cell Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
This trial is testing ONO-7018, a new drug designed to treat certain blood cancers that have not responded to other treatments. It works by blocking a protein that cancer cells need to grow. The study aims to find the best dose and check the drug's safety and effectiveness.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CNS Involvement, Active Infection, Others
Must Not Be Taking:MALT1 Inhibitors, Investigational Drugs
108 Participants Needed
Autologous Immune Cell Therapy for Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
This trial uses a patient's own enhanced immune cells to treat CLL/SLL that has come back despite standard treatments. The process involves collecting the patient's immune cells, enhancing them in a lab, and then reinfusing them to help fight the cancer.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
70 Participants Needed
M3814 + Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
This trial is testing a new drug called M3814 combined with three chemotherapy drugs to treat patients with a difficult type of leukemia. The new drug blocks cancer cell growth, and the chemotherapy drugs kill or stop the cancer cells.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CNS Involvement, Cardiopulmonary Disease, Others
Must Not Be Taking:CYP Inhibitors, CYP Inducers
48 Participants Needed
Azacitidine + Nivolumab/Midostaurin vs. Decitabine/Cytarabine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Huntington, West Virginia
This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well azacitidine with or without nivolumab or midostaurin, or decitabine and cytarabine alone work in treating older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as azacitidine, decitabine, and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Midostaurin may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving azacitidine with or without nivolumab or midostaurin, or decitabine and cytarabine alone may kill more cancer cells.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:60+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
76 Participants Needed
Gilteritinib for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Louisville, Kentucky
The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical benefit of ASP2215 therapy in participants with FMS-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3) mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are refractory to or have relapsed after first-line AML therapy as shown with overall survival (OS) compared to salvage chemotherapy, and to determine the efficacy of ASP2215 therapy as assessed by the rate of complete remission and complete remission with partial hematological recovery (CR/CRh) in these participants.
This study will also determine the overall efficacy in event-free survival (EFS) and complete remission (CR) rate of ASP2215 compared to salvage chemotherapy.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
371 Participants Needed
Combination Chemotherapy for T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
Cincinnati, Ohio
This randomized phase III trial is studying different combination chemotherapy regimens and their side effects and comparing how well they work in treating young patients with newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. After a common induction therapy, patients were risk assigned and eligible for one or both post-induction randomizations: Escalating dose Methotrexate versus High Dose Methotrexate in Interim Maintenance therapy, No Nelarabine versus Nelarabine in Consolidation therapy. T-ALL patients are risk assigned as Low Risk, Intermediate Risk or High Risk. Low Risk patients are not eligible for the Nelarabine randomization, Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis were assgined to receive High Dose Methotrexate, patients who failed induction therapy were assigned to receive Nelarabine and High Dose Methotrexate. T-LLy patients were all assigned to escalating dose Methotrexate and were risk assigned as Standard Risk, High Risk and induction failures. Standard risk patients did not receive nelarabine, High risk T-LLy patients were randomized to No Nelarabine versus Nelarabine, and Induction failures were assigned to receive Nelarabine.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:1 - 30
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
1895 Participants Needed
WU-NK-101 for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Louisville, Kentucky
This study is a Phase 1, open-label, dose escalation, and cohort expansion study designed to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-leukemic activity of WU-NK-101 in R/R AML.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
9 Participants Needed
LP-108 + Azacitidine for Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Activity of Orally Administered LP-108 as Monotherapy and in Combination with Azacitidine in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
36 Participants Needed
Blinatumomab + Chemotherapy for Leukemia
Louisville, Kentucky
This phase III trial compares the effect of usual treatment of chemotherapy and steroids and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to the same treatment plus blinatumomab. Blinatumomab is a Bi-specific T-Cell Engager ('BiTE') that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. The information gained from this study may help researchers determine if combination therapy with steroids, TKIs, and blinatumomab work better than the standard of care.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Active Infection, Unstable Epilepsy, Others
Must Be Taking:TKIs, Steroids
348 Participants Needed
CPX-351 + Gilteritinib for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Louisville, Kentucky
This phase III trial compares standard chemotherapy to therapy with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine (CPX-351) and/or gilteritinib for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with or without FLT3 mutations. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. CPX-351 is made up of daunorubicin and cytarabine and is made in a way that makes the drugs stay in the bone marrow longer and could be less likely to cause heart problems than traditional anthracycline drugs, a common class of chemotherapy drug. Some acute myeloid leukemia patients have an abnormality in the structure of a gene called FLT3. Genes are pieces of DNA (molecules that carry instructions for development, functioning, growth and reproduction) inside each cell that tell the cell what to do and when to grow and divide. FLT3 plays an important role in the normal making of blood cells. This gene can have permanent changes that cause it to function abnormally by making cancer cells grow. Gilteritinib may block the abnormal function of the FLT3 gene that makes cancer cells grow. The overall goals of this study are, 1) to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of CPX-351 with daunorubicin and cytarabine on people with newly diagnosed AML to find out which is better, 2) to study the effects, good and/or bad, of adding gilteritinib to AML therapy for patients with high amounts of FLT3/ITD or other FLT3 mutations and 3) to study changes in heart function during and after treatment for AML. Giving CPX-351 and/or gilteritinib with standard chemotherapy may work better in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia compared to standard chemotherapy alone.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:< 21
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Fanconi Anemia, Trisomy 21, Cardiac Dysfunction, Others
Must Not Be Taking:CYP3A4 Inducers, P-gp Inducers
1186 Participants Needed
DFP-10917 for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
Phase III, multicenter, randomized study with two arms (1:1 ratio) enrolling patients with AML relapsed/refractory after 2, 3, or 4 prior induction regimens:
Experimental arm: DFP-10917 14-day continuous intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 6 mg/m²/day followed by a 14-day resting period per 28-day cycles.
Control arm: Non-Intensive Reinduction (LoDAC, Azacitidine, Decitabine, Venetoclax Combination Regimens) or Intensive Reinduction (High and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Regimens), depending on the patient's prior induction treatment.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cardiac Dysfunction, High WBC, HIV, Others
450 Participants Needed
Daunorubicin + Cytarabine ± Uproleselan for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Effingham, Illinois
This phase II/III trial studies how well daunorubicin and cytarabine with or without uproleselan works in treating older adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving intensive induction chemotherapy. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as daunorubicin and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Uproleselan may prevent cancer from returning or getting worse. Giving daunorubicin and cytarabine with uproleselan may work better in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia compared to daunorubicin and cytarabine alone.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2, 3
Age:60+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CNS Involvement, FLT3 Mutation, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Hypomethylating Agents
264 Participants Needed
Sonrotoclax Combinations for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
The goal of this study is to compare how well sonrotoclax plus obinutuzumab works versus venetoclax plus rituximab in treating adults with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). The study will also compare how well sonrotoclax plus rituximab works versus venetoclax plus rituxumab in treating adults with R/R CLL/SLL. The safety of these treatments will also be assessed.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Prolymphocytic Leukemia, Richter's Transformation, Others
630 Participants Needed
Bleximenib + Venetoclax + Azacitidine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Lexington, Kentucky
The purpose of this study is to assess how bleximenib and Venetoclax (VEN)+ Azacitidine (AZA) works as compared to placebo and VEN+AZA alone for the treatment of participants with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with a mutation in the NPM1 or KMT2A gene.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia, CNS Involvement, Organ Transplant, Cardiac Disorders, Others
600 Participants Needed
Why Other Patients Applied
"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."
HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78
"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."
WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58
"I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."
ZS
Depression PatientAge: 51
"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."
FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31
"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."
AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Edgewood, Kentucky
The goal of this study is to evaluate nemtabrutinib compared with investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received any prior therapy. The primary hypotheses are that (1) nemtabrutinib is non-inferior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to objective response rate (ORR) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) Criteria 2018 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and (2) nemtabrutinib is superior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to progression free survival (PFS) per iwCLL Criteria 2018 by BICR.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Active HBV/HCV, CNS Involvement, Others
Must Not Be Taking:P-gp Substrates, CYP3A Inducers
1200 Participants Needed
The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of sonrotoclax plus zanubrutinib versus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Previous CLL Treatment, Prolymphocytic Leukemia, CNS Involvement, PML, Others
652 Participants Needed
Venetoclax + Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Louisville, Kentucky
This trial is testing whether adding venetoclax to standard chemotherapy can help young patients with relapsed AML. Venetoclax works by blocking a protein that helps cancer cells survive, making it easier for the chemotherapy to kill them. The study aims to find better treatment options for these patients who have limited choices. Venetoclax has been shown to improve overall survival in older and unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia when combined with lower intensity therapies.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:29 - 21
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Down Syndrome, APL, JMML, Others
Must Not Be Taking:CYP3A Inducers
98 Participants Needed
Asciminib vs Other TKIs for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Lexington, Kentucky
This trial is testing a new drug called asciminib against other existing treatments for adults newly diagnosed with a specific type of leukemia. The goal is to see if asciminib is more effective at blocking a protein that helps cancer cells grow. Asciminib has shown superior efficacy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) previously treated with multiple other treatments.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CNS Infiltration, Cardiac Issues, Others
Must Be Taking:Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
406 Participants Needed
Combination Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Cape Girardeau, Missouri
This phase III trial studies how well ibrutinib and obinutuzumab with or without venetoclax work in treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ibrutinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Obinutuzumab is a monoclonal antibody. It binds to a protein called CD20, which is found on B cells (a type of white blood cell) and some types of cancer cells. This may help the immune system kill cancer cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Giving ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax may work better than giving ibrutinib and obinutuzumab in treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Congestive Heart Failure, Hepatitis C, Others
Must Not Be Taking:CYP3A Inhibitors, CYP3A Inducers
720 Participants Needed
The purpose of this study is to assess progression-free survival (PFS) from treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax (I+VEN) compared with obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (G-Clb) as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Prior Anti-leukemic Therapy, Del17p, TP53 Mutation, Others
211 Participants Needed
Zanubrutinib vs Bendamustine + Rituximab for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Mount Sterling, Kentucky
To compare efficacy between zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CLL/SLL, as measured by progression free survival assess by Independent Central Review.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cardiovascular Disease, Prior Malignancy, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Corticosteroids, CYP3A Inhibitors
590 Participants Needed
Acalabrutinib vs Standard Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Mount Sterling, Kentucky
This trial compares acalabrutinib with rituximab combined with either idelalisib or bendamustine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who have already been treated before. Acalabrutinib stops cancer cells from growing, while rituximab helps the immune system kill them. Idelalisib blocks growth signals, and bendamustine damages cancer cell DNA. Acalabrutinib has been approved for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the US.
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CNS Lymphoma, Richter's Syndrome, Others
Must Not Be Taking:BCL-2 Inhibitors, BCR Inhibitors, Others
310 Participants Needed
Acalabrutinib + Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Louisville, Kentucky
This Primary objective is evaluating the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (Arm B) for the treatment of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Secondary objectives: 1) To evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) based on IRC assessment of PFS per IWCLL 2008 criteria.
2)To compare obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab (Arm B) and obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) in terms of: IRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR); Tine to next treatment (TTNT); Overall Survival (OS)
No Placebo Group
Prior Safety Data
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Prior CLL Treatment, CNS Lymphoma, Cardiovascular Disease, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Corticosteroids, Anticoagulants, PPIs, CYP3A Inhibitors
535 Participants Needed
Tretinoin + Arsenic Trioxide for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Cincinnati, Ohio
This phase III trial studies tretinoin and arsenic trioxide in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Standard treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia involves high doses of a common class of chemotherapy drugs called anthracyclines, which are known to cause long-term side effects, especially to the heart. Tretinoin may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Arsenic trioxide may stop the growth of cancer cells by either killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Completely removing or reducing the amount of anthracycline chemotherapy and giving tretinoin together with arsenic trioxide may be an effective treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia and may reduce some of the long-term side effects.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:12 - 21
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Secondary APL, Prolonged QT, Pregnancy, Others
Must Be Taking:ATRA, Hydroxyurea, Corticosteroids
158 Participants Needed
Know someone looking for new options?
Spread the word
Learn More About Power
We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.
Bask GillCEO at Power
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do Leukemia clinical trials in Kentucky pay?
Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.
How do Leukemia clinical trials in Kentucky work?
After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Leukemia trials in Kentucky 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length in Kentucky for Leukemia is 12 months.
How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?
Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility in Kentucky several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.
What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?
The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.
Do I need to be insured to participate in a Leukemia medical study in Kentucky?
Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.
What are the newest Leukemia clinical trials in Kentucky?
Most recently, we added Pirtobrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Venetoclax for Relapsed Hairy Cell Leukemia and Ziftomenib for AML to the Power online platform.
Popular Searches
By Condition
By Location
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.