1200 Participants Needed

Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Recruiting at 184 trial locations
TF
Overseen ByToll Free Number
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial
Breakthrough TherapyThis drug has been fast-tracked for approval by the FDA given its high promise

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The goal of this study is to evaluate nemtabrutinib compared with investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received any prior therapy. The primary hypotheses are that (1) nemtabrutinib is non-inferior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to objective response rate (ORR) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) Criteria 2018 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and (2) nemtabrutinib is superior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to progression free survival (PFS) per iwCLL Criteria 2018 by BICR.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but you cannot be on certain drugs like p-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic index or strong/moderate CYP3A inducers or inhibitors.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug Nemtabrutinib for treating Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

Research shows that acalabrutinib, a component of the treatment, is effective for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and is better tolerated than similar drugs like ibrutinib. It has a favorable safety profile without compromising effectiveness, making it a promising option for CLL treatment.12345

What is the safety profile of acalabrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Acalabrutinib, a treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, generally has a favorable safety profile compared to similar drugs like ibrutinib. It may cause some side effects such as headaches and cough, and there is a higher risk of neutropenia (low white blood cell count) when used with obinutuzumab. However, it tends to have fewer severe side effects like atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) and hypertension (high blood pressure) compared to ibrutinib.36789

What makes the drug Nemtabrutinib unique for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Nemtabrutinib is unique because it is a novel Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, similar to acalabrutinib and ibrutinib, which are known for their effectiveness in targeting specific pathways in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This drug offers a new option for patients, potentially improving outcomes by providing an alternative mechanism of action compared to traditional chemotherapy.15101112

Research Team

MD

Medical Director

Principal Investigator

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who need treatment and have not been treated before. They should be able to perform daily activities with ease to moderate difficulty (ECOG 0-2), swallow pills, and if they have hepatitis B or C, it must be under control. People with HIV can join if they meet all other criteria.

Inclusion Criteria

I have been diagnosed with CLL/SLL and need treatment.
I am hepatitis B positive but have been on antiviral therapy for over 4 weeks with an undetectable HBV DNA level.
I had hepatitis C but my current tests show no virus.
See 4 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either nemtabrutinib or investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Up to 104 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

Up to 104 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Acalabrutinib
  • Ibrutinib
  • Nemtabrutinib
Trial Overview The study compares Nemtabrutinib against either Ibrutinib or Acalabrutinib in treating CLL/SLL patients without prior therapy. It aims to see if Nemtabrutinib works as well as the others in shrinking tumors and helps patients stay disease-free longer.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: NemtabrutinibExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Participants will receive nemtabrutinib at specified dose until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or until discontinuation criteria are met.
Group II: Ibrutinib/AcalabrutinibActive Control2 Interventions
Participants will receive investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib at specified dose until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or until discontinuation criteria are met.

Acalabrutinib is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Calquence for:
  • Mantle cell lymphoma
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Small lymphocytic lymphoma
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Calquence for:
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • Mantle cell lymphoma

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Lead Sponsor

Trials
4,096
Recruited
5,232,000+
Chirfi Guindo profile image

Chirfi Guindo

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Chief Marketing Officer since 2022

Degree in Engineering from Ecole Centrale de Paris, MBA from New York University Stern School of Business

Robert M. Davis profile image

Robert M. Davis

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Chief Executive Officer since 2021

JD from Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, MBA from Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Bachelor's in Finance from Miami University

Findings from Research

In a phase III study involving 310 patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), acalabrutinib monotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to investigator's choice treatments, with a median PFS not reached for acalabrutinib versus 16.5 months for the comparator group.
Acalabrutinib demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with serious adverse events occurring in 29% of patients, compared to 56% for idelalisib plus rituximab and 26% for bendamustine plus rituximab, indicating it may be a safer option for patients.
ASCEND: Phase III, Randomized Trial of Acalabrutinib Versus Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Ghia, P., Pluta, A., Wach, M., et al.[2021]
In a phase III trial involving patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acalabrutinib and ibrutinib showed equivalent progression-free survival rates, indicating similar efficacy in treatment.
Acalabrutinib was better tolerated by patients compared to ibrutinib, likely due to its greater selectivity, suggesting it may be a safer option for long-term use.
BTK Inhibitors Show Similar Benefits in CLL.[2022]
Acalabrutinib, a selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed improved safety outcomes compared to other targeted therapies for treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients, although it was associated with a higher risk of neutropenia and leukopenia in some cases.
The analysis indicated that acalabrutinib (with or without obinutuzumab) had similar efficacy in terms of progression-free survival compared to other treatments, suggesting it is a safe and effective option for CLL patients.
Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib versus other targeted therapies in patients with treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Davids, MS., Telford, C., Abhyankar, S., et al.[2021]

References

ASCEND: Phase III, Randomized Trial of Acalabrutinib Versus Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. [2021]
BTK Inhibitors Show Similar Benefits in CLL. [2022]
Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib versus other targeted therapies in patients with treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [2021]
Comparison Between Venetoclax-based and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-based Therapy as Upfront Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. [2022]
[Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: current standards and novel approaches]. [2018]
Acalabrutinib-Related Cardiac Toxicities in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. [2022]
Detailed safety profile of acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the ELEVATE-RR trial. [2023]
Targeted Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Clinical Utility of Acalabrutinib. [2022]
Phase II study of acalabrutinib in ibrutinib-intolerant patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [2021]
Cost-effectiveness of acalabrutinib regimens in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the United States. [2023]
Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. [2021]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ibrutinib (imbruvica): a novel targeted therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [2021]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security