Combination Chemotherapy for T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma

No longer recruiting at 234 trial locations
Age: < 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to determine which combination of chemotherapy drugs best treats T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LLy) in young patients. Chemotherapy uses drugs to stop cancer cells from growing or dividing. The trial evaluates different drug combinations to identify the most effective one with the fewest side effects. Participants should have newly diagnosed T-ALL or T-LLy and should not have received prior chemotherapy, except for steroids or certain specific treatments. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants a chance to contribute to potentially groundbreaking treatment advancements.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial protocol does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, patients with a prior seizure disorder requiring anti-convulsant therapy are not eligible to receive nelarabine, which suggests that some medications may affect eligibility or treatment options.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research shows that the drugs used in the trial have varying safety levels, depending on the specific drug and its administration. For example, studies have found that pegaspargase, a type of asparaginase, is usually well-tolerated but can cause allergic reactions in some individuals. Monitoring for blood clotting issues during treatment is important.

Cyclophosphamide, another drug in the trial, is approved for treating various cancers, including blood cancers, but can cause side effects like nausea and hair loss. It also carries risks of infertility and secondary cancers.

Daunorubicin and doxorubicin are chemotherapy drugs that can be effective but may cause heart problems and lower blood cell counts. Dexamethasone, a steroid used in cancer treatment, can help reduce inflammation but might affect mood and cause weight gain.

Methotrexate is approved for treating leukemia but can lead to liver and kidney problems. Nelarabine, used specifically for T-cell leukemia, can cause nerve damage in some patients.

Vincristine is also part of the treatment plan and is approved for treating leukemia. It can cause nerve damage and constipation but is generally considered effective.

Overall, these drugs have long been used in cancer treatment and have well-known safety profiles. Monitoring and managing side effects is crucial for using these medications safely.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about this combination chemotherapy for T-cell leukemia and lymphoma because it uses a multi-drug approach, potentially improving outcomes for patients. Unlike traditional treatments that may focus on fewer drugs, this regimen includes a mix of medications like vincristine sulfate, pegaspargase, and nelarabine, each attacking cancer cells in different ways. This diverse mechanism of action may enhance effectiveness and address the disease from multiple angles. Additionally, the inclusion of high-dose methotrexate, along with tailored dosing schedules, could lead to better disease control and reduced relapse rates. Overall, this treatment aims to provide a more comprehensive attack on cancer cells, offering hope for better patient outcomes.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for T-cell leukemia/lymphoma?

This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of various chemotherapy combinations for T-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Asparaginase, one of the drugs tested, has been linked to an 87.5% chance of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia remaining disease-free for 10 years. Cyclophosphamide, another drug in this trial, shows a high success rate, with 77% of T-cell lymphoma patients responding to treatment and 53% achieving complete remission. Methotrexate, especially in high doses, significantly improves survival, with 71.1% of certain T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients remaining event-free for 5 years. Nelarabine, also part of this trial, has shown a 91% chance of young patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia staying disease-free for 4 years. Vincristine, when used with other drugs, leads to a 77% complete remission rate in certain lymphomas. These findings suggest that the combinations tested in this trial could effectively treat T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.678910

Who Is on the Research Team?

SS

Stuart S Winter

Principal Investigator

Children's Oncology Group

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for young patients with newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. It's not open to those with Down syndrome, unclassifiable lymphoma, CNS3-positive/testicular involvement, pregnant/lactating females, or B-precursor lymphoblastic lymphoma.

Inclusion Criteria

I have not had chemotherapy, except for steroids or IT cytarabine.
My leukemia is classified as T-ALL based on specific cell markers.
I have been newly diagnosed with T-ALL or T-NHL at stage II-IV.
See 6 more

Exclusion Criteria

My T-NHL does not include specific types like B-precursor lymphoblastic lymphoma or involve the brain/testicles.
Patients with Down syndrome are ineligible to enroll onto this study
Pregnant or lactating females are ineligible

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Induction Therapy

All patients receive a combination of chemotherapy drugs including cytarabine, vincristine sulfate, prednisone, pegaspargase, daunorubicin hydrochloride, and methotrexate

4 weeks
Weekly visits for drug administration

Consolidation Chemotherapy

Patients receive methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, mercaptopurine, vincristine sulfate, and pegaspargase. Some patients also receive nelarabine and testicular radiotherapy

8 weeks
Bi-weekly visits for drug administration

Interim Maintenance Chemotherapy

Patients receive vincristine sulfate, escalating doses of methotrexate, and pegaspargase. Some patients receive high dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue

8 weeks
Visits every 10 days for drug administration

Delayed Intensification Chemotherapy

Patients receive vincristine sulfate, dexamethasone, doxorubicin hydrochloride, pegaspargase, methotrexate, nelarabine, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and thioguanine

8 weeks
Weekly visits for drug administration

Maintenance Chemotherapy

Patients receive vincristine sulfate, prednisone, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and nelarabine. Treatment repeats every 84 days until 2-3 years from the start of interim maintenance therapy

2-3 years
Monthly visits for drug administration

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

10 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Asparaginase
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Daunorubicin Hydrochloride
  • Dexamethasone
  • Doxorubicin Hydrochloride
  • Mercaptopurine
  • Methotrexate
  • Nelarabine
  • Pegaspargase
  • Prednisone
  • Radiation Therapy
  • Thioguanine
  • Vincristine Sulfate
Trial Overview The study tests different combination chemotherapy regimens to see which is more effective against T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Patients receive a common induction therapy first and then get assigned varying treatments based on their risk level and response.
How Is the Trial Designed?
17Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Group 0 Induction TherapyExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Group II: Group I Arm III (Maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control3 Interventions
Group III: Group I Arm I (Interim maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control4 Interventions
Group IV: Group I Arm II (Delayed intensification chemotherapy)Active Control8 Interventions
Group V: Group I Arm III (Delayed intensification chemotherapy)Active Control9 Interventions
Group VI: Group I Arm III (Consolidation chemotherapy)Active Control8 Interventions
Group VII: Group I Arm II (Consolidation chemotherapy)Active Control8 Interventions
Group VIII: Group I Arm I (Consolidation chemotherapy)Active Control8 Interventions
Group IX: Group I Arm I (Delayed intensification chemotherapyActive Control9 Interventions
Group X: Group I Arm II (Maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control5 Interventions
Group XI: Group I Arm III (Interim maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control5 Interventions
Group XII: Group I Arm IV (Delayed intensification chemotherapy)Active Control9 Interventions
Group XIII: Group I Arm IV (Interim maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control5 Interventions
Group XIV: Group I Arm IV (Maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control5 Interventions
Group XV: Group I Arm I (Maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control5 Interventions
Group XVI: Group 1 Arm IV (Consolidation chemotherapy)Active Control7 Interventions
Group XVII: Group I Arm II (Interim maintenance chemotherapy)Active Control4 Interventions

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Lead Sponsor

Trials
14,080
Recruited
41,180,000+

Citations

A Randomized Clinical Trial - PMC - PubMed CentralPD1 blockade with pembrolizumab is highly effective in relapsed or refractory NK/T-cell lymphoma failing l-asparaginase. Blood. 2017;129(17):2437-2442. doi ...
2.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10086723/
A Pediatric Oncology Group Study - PubMed - NIHFour-year continuous complete remission rate (CCR) for the leukemia patients was 68% (s.e. 4%) with asparaginase as compared to 55% (s.e. 4%) without. For the ...
A Phase II Prospective Study Evaluating an L-Asparaginase ...With a median follow-up of 18 months, the 2-year PFS and OS were 30.5%. and 60.2%. Note that the relatively low 2-year PFS was due to censoring ...
PEG-L-CHOP treatment is safe and effective in adult ...We treated patients with PEG-L-CHOP and achieved 96.9% ORR (75.8% CR and 21.2% PR). This treatment efficacy was similar to our previous report ...
L‐asparaginase treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia41 Children given asparaginase had a significantly increased 10-year disease-free survival (87.5% vs 78.7%) and an overall survival (93.7% vs ...
6.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25854457/
[Safety of polyethylene glycol conjugated L-asparaginase ...The risk of allergic reaction incurred by PEG-Asp is very low. It can be used safely in ALL and T-NHL. Coagulation status should be monitored during the ...
Proven Efficacy and SafetyExplore the safety and efficacy data supporting the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with ONCASPAR® (pegaspargase).
Efficacy and Safety of a Pegasparaginase-Based ...The DDGP regimen was well tolerated and showed statistically significant survival benefit over the SMILE regimen in treating newly diagnosed ENKL.
Peg-asparaginase associated toxicities in children with ...The study aimed to characterize the prevalence of common toxicities related to polyethylene glycol (PEG) asparaginase in children aged 0–14 years diagnosed ...
Managing toxicities with asparaginase-based therapies in ...The best management of several key toxicities that can occur in adults treated with asparaginase including hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, hypertriglyceridaemia, ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security