Condition
Suggested Conditions
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Weight Loss
- Heart Disease
- Cancer
- Asthma
Location
Search Clinical Trials
Conditions
Locations
Treatment Type
Trial Phase
Trial Status
Paid Participation
Clear All
43 Intensive Care Unit Trials Near You
Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Intensive Care Unit patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.
Learn More About PowerTIN816 for Acute Kidney Injury
Columbus, Ohio
The purpose of this Ph2b study is to characterize the dose-response relationship and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three different single doses of TIN816 in hospitalized adult participants in an intensive care setting with a diagnosis of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI).
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:CKD, Immunosuppression, Active TB, Others
Must Not Be Taking:NSAIDs, Immunosuppressants, Aminoglycosides, Others
320 Participants Needed
Prone Positioning + HFOV for Severe Pediatric ARDS
Cincinnati, Ohio
Severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is a life-threatening and frequent problem experienced by thousands of children each year. Little evidence supports current supportive practices during their critical illness. The overall objective of this study is to identify the best positional and/or ventilation practice that leads to improved patient outcomes in these critically ill children. We hypothesize that children with high moderate-severe PARDS treated with either prone positioning or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) will demonstrate more days off the ventilator when compared to children treated with supine positioning or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:2 - 20
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cardiac Failure, Cyanotic Heart Disease, Neuromuscular Respiratory Failure, Others
600 Participants Needed
Health Screening and Referral for Premature Birth
Cincinnati, Ohio
Up to a quarter of the families with preterm infants have unmet social needs, such as housing or job insecurity, which represent adverse social determinants of health (SDOH). Preterm infants are especially vulnerable to the social conditions they grow up in, with sustained impacts on function across multiple organ systems. The goal of this study is to translate an established model of SDOH screening and referral from the outpatient setting to the NICU, thereby maximizing the potential to offset the effects of adverse SDOH on vulnerable mother-preterm infant dyads.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Infant Death, Late Discharge, Others
882 Participants Needed
Transitional Care and Support for Critical Illness
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The goal of this randomized control trial is to test an intervention designed to improve patient and family outcomes after critical illness compared to usual care. The intervention, called Post-Intensive Care Transitions, Rehabilitation and Family Support (PIC-TRFS) combines four elements: (1) health management; (2) rehabilitation; (3) social support; (4) care coordination. All patients and families enrolled in this study will have spent at least 48 hours in an ICU, be at risk for long-term functional impairment, and be discharged home. Although age of the patients will be restricted to those who are at least 50 years old and caregivers must be adults over 18 and all participants must speak English, the study will enroll all sexes, genders, races, and ethnicities. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
1. Compared to usual care, does PIC-TRFS improve patient quality of life at the end of the 6-month intervention period measured via PROMIS-Preferences (PROPr) score?
2. Compared to usual care, does PIC-TRFS improve patient physical, cognitive, and psychological functioning measured via PROMIS Physical, Cognitive, and Depression Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) at 6 and 12 months after discharge? Does it increase the number of days survivors spend alive at home in the 6 and 12 months after discharge? Does it improve patient and family trauma scores and dyadic quality of life, measured via the Impact of Events Scale-Revised and dyadic PROPr score?
Participants will:
* Complete Run-In assessments of symptoms and function in the hospital;
* Be randomized to intervention or control;
* Complete assessments of their function and quality of life at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months
* Control participants will get a brochure on the Post-Intensive Care syndrome and complete the assessments on the same schedule as those receiving the intervention
* Intervention participants will complete tele-health based check-ins providing health management, social support, and care coordination; and telehealth-based rehabilitation sessions focusing on patient functioning.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:No Caregiver, Transitional Care, Dependency, Others
320 Participants Needed
"PICU Up!" Early Mobility Intervention for Critically Ill Children
Morgantown, West Virginia
While mortality in U.S. pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is improving, surviving children frequently develop persistent physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments. Over half of critically ill children experience potentially preventable PICU-acquired morbidities, with mechanically ventilated children being at greatest risk. In critically ill adults, randomized trials have shown that progressive mobility, started early (within 3 days of initiating mechanical ventilation), decreases muscle weakness and the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, similar randomized studies have not been conducted in the PICU. The investigator's prior studies revealed that less than 10 percent of critically ill children at the highest risk of functional decline are evaluated by a physical or occupational therapist within 3 days of PICU admission. Given the interplay of sedation, delirium, sleep, and immobility in the PICU, single-component interventions, such as sedation protocolization, have not consistently shown benefit for decreasing mechanical ventilation duration. Thus, the investigators developed the first pediatric-specific, interprofessional intervention (PICU Up!) to integrate goal-directed sedation, delirium prevention, sleep promotion, and family engagement into daily PICU care in order to facilitate early and progressive mobility. The investigators have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this pragmatic, multifaceted strategy in both single-site and multicenter pilot studies. Hence, the next phase of the investigators research is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and delivery of the PICU Up! intervention across a range of PICU patients and health systems. The investigators propose a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial that will include 10 academic and community hospitals in the United States, with the following Aims: 1) Evaluate if the PICU Up! intervention, delivered under real-world conditions, decreases mechanical ventilation duration (primary outcome) and improves delirium and functional status compared to usual care in critically ill children; and 2) Conduct a multi-stakeholder, mixed-methods process evaluation to identify key contextual factors associated with delivery of PICU Up!. If proven effective, the PICU Up! intervention has potential to profoundly change medical care in the PICU and substantially impact public health by improving outcomes for the growing number of pediatric survivors of critical illness.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:< 18
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Withdrawal Of Life Support, ECMO, Others
1440 Participants Needed
Music Therapy for ICU Delirium
Indianapolis, Indiana
Critically ill older adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at a higher risk to develop delirium, which predisposes them to longer lengths of ICU and hospital stay, increased in-patient mortality, and higher risk of new acquired cognitive impairment and dementia. Music listening is a non-pharmacological intervention that holds potential to decrease ICU delirium. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a seven-day slow-tempo music intervention on the primary outcome of delirium/coma free days among mechanically ventilated, critically ill older adults.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:50+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
160 Participants Needed
Inhaled Sedation for Delirium in Critically Ill Children
London, Ontario
The goal of a pilot study is to test a study plan to see if it is appropriate for a larger study. This study plan is looking at whether the use of inhaled sedatives (medications that help people be calm and sleep) can reduce delirium (extreme confusion) in children who need a ventilator (breathing machine) compared to IV or oral sedatives.
The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
* Will people join the study? (recruitment)
* Will participants finish the study?
* Will healthcare teams accept the study procedures?
Participants will be randomized to receive study treatment (inhaled sedation) or standard of care (IV sedation). They will be monitored daily for up to 28 days. They will complete memory, thinking and behaviour tasks after 9-12 months.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:1 - 18
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Malignant Hyperthermia, Myopathy, High ICP, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Inhaled Prostacyclin
60 Participants Needed
Sex-Matched Blood Transfusions for Critically Ill Patients
London, Ontario
Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are selected based upon matching donor and recipient blood group: donor and recipient sex are not considered when selecting blood for transfusion. Hence, transfused patients can currently receive sex-matched and/or unmatched RBCs when transfusions are given. Sex-matched stem cell transplants, and some solid organ transplants, have shown that sex-matching donor to recipient improves patient outcomes. Recent exploratory studies have also suggested that patient outcomes could be improved by sex-matching for RBC transfusion. There is emerging evidence of underlying biologic mechanism(s) to support these observations. This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial and will explore the impact on patients who receive RBC transfusions from donors of the same sex ("sex-matched") compared with donors of the opposite sex ("sex-mismatched").
The trial will study adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit who require an RBC transfusion. Patients will be assigned (through a process called randomization) to receive sex-matched RBCs or sex-mismatched RBCs to determine if there is a difference in mortality between those receiving matched versus mismatched RBCs. The results of this trial could have direct implications on resources, blood inventory, and RBC transfusion ordering practices.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Rare Blood Type, Massive Bleeding, Intersex, Others
11082 Participants Needed
NICU2HOME+ App for Premature Birth
Chicago, Illinois
The purpose of this project is to provide a stepwise, methodical approach to developing and testing the ability of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 2 Home (NICU2HOME+) to support diverse Illinois families of premature infants during and after their Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) stays in an effort to address health equity, improve parenting, and reduce costs. There are 3 objectives of the study: 1) Identify and assess the requirements for expansion of NICU2HOME+, a suite of mobile patient education and engagement applications with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) integration that is culturally appropriate and customized to the needs of a diverse population of patients and families to 3 additional level III Illinois NICUS; 2) develop and deploy NICU2HOME+ to these 3 additional NICUs; and 3)determine if it is effective in: a) addressing health equity issues, b) improving parenting self-efficacy and satisfaction, and c) improving NICU outcomes such as a reduced length of stay and lower readmission rates that result in lower healthcare costs.
All research recruitment and participation will take place in the following spaces:
1. Northwestern Medicine's Central DuPage Hospital (25 N.Winfield Rd., Winfield, IL)- NICU, Postpartum, and Research Offices
2. Northwest Community Hospital (800 W. Central Rd., Arlington Heights, IL)- NICU,Postpartum, and Research Offices
3. Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, IL)- NICU, Postpartum, and Research Offices
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
413 Participants Needed
Ketamine for Intensive Care Unit Patients
Hamilton, Ontario
Sedation is given to intensive care unit (ICU) patients to treat discomfort, anxiety, agitation, and to help facilitate care, particularly when they require a breathing tube. Sedation is very commonly used in the ICU with North American data showing almost 40% of ICU patients get sedation to help when they are requiring a breathing machine. Various medications can be given intravenously to provide sedation in the ICU but there are side-effects associated with each such as decreasing a patient's own drive to breathe, and delirium or acute confusion, both of which are associated with worse outcomes. Also, most drugs used for sedation don't treat pain. As a result, many ICU patients are also given narcotics for pain control which can result in tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal. Ketamine is a sedating medication that also treats pain and is often used in the Emergency Department and in the Operating Room but for whatever reason is not commonly used in the ICU.
The investigators are proposing a study to examine the usefulness and safety of adding an intravenous infusion of ketamine to usual care in adult patients that are on a breathing machine in the ICU.
Study Methods The KANINE study is being done at hospitals across Ontario, Canada. It is a randomized controlled trial which means patients will be randomized (akin to a coin flip) to receive ketamine or usual care without ketamine. The study will be blinded which means that neither patients or the doctors will know if the patient is getting ketamine or not, those that get randomized to usual care without ketamine will get an intravenous solution that looks the same as the ketamine infusion. This is important to make sure the results aren't biased in any way. The investigators will include adult ICU patients on a breathing machine who are early in their ICU admission. As most patients will be unconscious, the investigators will ask substitute decision makers (families or caregivers) of patients for informed consent prior to the study commencing. Regardless of whether patients get randomized to ketamine or not, the investigators will make sure that all patients will be adequately sedated and have their pain managed as per usual care.
Setting This study will be performed in adult ICUs across Canada.
Population The investigators will include adults admitted to the ICU on a breathing machine for at least 24 hours (and fewer than 3 days). The investigators will exclude patients if: (i) they were admitted with a brain bleed, traumatic brain injury, or stroke; (ii) Admitted with uncontrolled high blood pressure; (iii) if they have a history of schizophrenia; (iv) if they have very bad liver failure; (v) if they are palliative or only for comfort care; (vi) if they are receiving a medication that causes paralysis, sometimes used in patients with very bad lung disease; (vii) if they have a tracheostomy which means a whole in their neck that they breathe through; (viii) if they are allergic to ketamine; (ix) if they've had a liver transplant in the last month; (x) if they are pregnant or breast-feeding.
Outcomes The investigators will follow all the study patients to see if their outcomes are different depending on whether they get randomized to ketamine or not. The investigators will capture how much time they are on the breathing machine, whether they survive or die, how long they stay in the ICU and whether they require a tracheostomy which is a procedure often done on patients who require the breathing machine over a prolonged period of time.
The investigators will also capture how often they get delirious and for those that get delirious how long it lasts for. The investigators will capture how much of other sedating medications study patients use such as antipsychotics and benzodiazepines. The investigators will capture outcomes such as how often study patients get post-traumatic stress disorder after leaving the ICU and how well their pain relief is addressed during their ICU stay. Finally, the investigators will capture side effects related to ketamine or other sedating drug use.
Stay on current meds
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Brain Injury, Hypertension, Schizophrenia, Liver Failure, Others
Must Be Taking:Non-ketamine Sedatives
54 Participants Needed
Albumin for Acute Kidney Injury
Hamilton, Ontario
Study objectives:
To determine whether, in critically ill patients with Acute Kidney Injury requiring renal replacement therapy (AKI-RRT), randomization to receive intravenous hyperoncotic albumin 20-25% (100 mL X two doses) compared to control/placebo normal saline boluses (100 mL X two doses) given during RRT sessions, leads to:
1. An increase in organ support-free days (primary outcome) at 28 days following randomization; and
2. An increase in RRT-free days (principal secondary outcome) at 28 days following randomization.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:End-stage Kidney Disease, Kidney Transplant, Advanced Cirrhosis, Others
856 Participants Needed
Reduced Fluid Volume for Pediatric Trauma
Buffalo, New York
This study is designed to help decide how much intravenous (IV) fluid should be given to pediatric trauma patients. No standard currently exists for managing fluids in critically ill pediatric trauma patients, and many fluid strategies are now in practice. For decades, trauma patients got high volumes of IV fluid. Recent studies in adults show that patients actually do better by giving less fluid. The investigators do not know if this is true in children and this study is designed to answer that question and provide guidelines for IV fluid management in children after trauma.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:6 - 15
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Congenital Heart Disease, Chronic Cardiac Condition, Chronic Kidney Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury, Others
250 Participants Needed
Multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label Phase 2 feasibility trial. Subjects on mechanical ventilation (MV) for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) with lung injury (including subjects who meet criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)) will be randomized 2:1 to diaphragm neurostimulation-assisted ventilation (DNAV) using the AeroNova System plus lung-protective ventilation (Treatment) vs. lung-protective ventilation alone (Control).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:COPD, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Severe Liver Disease, Others
30 Participants Needed
Intranasal Fentanyl for Procedural Pain
Toronto, Ontario
The purpose of this feasibility clinical trial is to explore the role of intranasal fentanyl for pain associated with PICC placement in preterm infants. The primary goals are identifying whether enough infants join the study and complete the study procedures.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Age:0 - 1
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
30 Participants Needed
ICU Communication Tool for Serious Injury
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on quality of communication, clinician moral distress, and ICU length of stay for older adults with serious traumatic injury. Investigators will follow an estimated 4500 patients aged 50 years and older who are in the ICU for 3 or more days and survey 1500 family members and up to 1600 clinicians from 8 sites nationwide.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
7600 Participants Needed
Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation for ICU Survivorship
Nashville, Tennessee
Millions of patients survive care in medical and surgical Intensive Care Units (ICUs) every year, only to suffer from a new or accelerated dementia-like process, called post-ICU long-term cognitive impairment (ICU-LTCI). ICU-LTCI causes considerable problems with personal relationships, return to work, and everyday tasks, such as managing medicines and money. No treatment for these patients is currently available. Technology using computerized cognitive rehabilitation could improve ICU-LTCI by harnessing the healing potential of the brain (i.e., neuroplasticity). This intervention is scalable, portable, and economical. The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of computerized cognitive rehabilitation in a randomized controlled trial of 160 VA patients with ICU-LTCI. The investigators hypothesize that this intervention could improve cognition, and brain structure shown by MRI. This research has high potential to influence rehabilitation strategies for Veteran and civilian ICU survivors.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Severe Cognitive Impairment, Hospice, Substance Abuse, Suicidal Ideation, Others
160 Participants Needed
Customized Handoff Protocols for ICU Patient Safety
Baltimore, Maryland
The investigators will leverage implementation science and engineering to adapt, implement, and rigorously evaluate tailored postoperative handoff protocols and implementation strategies. In doing so, the investigators will develop a vital understanding of the factors needed for successful and sustained use of evidence-based interventions in acute care. This knowledge will inform approaches to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap that prevents effective interventions from realizing the promise of improved patient outcomes in acute care settings.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Research Staff
4000 Participants Needed
Nutrition Ecosystem for Post-Abdominal Surgery
Durham, North Carolina
This trial tests a detailed nutrition plan for patients after major abdominal surgery. It includes specialized feeding, assessing nutritional requirements, and monitoring health to ensure proper nutrition.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Hepatic Failure, Others
300 Participants Needed
Virtual Reality for ICU Patients
Durham, North Carolina
The goal of this study is to explore if Virtual Reality helps patients in the cardiothoracic ICU move more and feel better. Participants will be asked to answer a survey about anxiety, depression, and loneliness. The study team will teach participants how to use the VR device and how to play the game. Participants will play the game at least once per day, but can play as much as they want. Study activities include nurse facilitated patient use of VR applications that involve upper body movement (e.g., using arms and hands to dance or hit objects in a virtual reality environment).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Blindness, Seizures, Others
30 Participants Needed
Shared Decision Making Intervention for Healthcare Inequalities
Durham, North Carolina
This is a non randomized pilot trial aimed to:
Test the feasibility of an intervention to support intensive care unit clinicians in conducting shared decision making conversations with families of patients with acute respiratory failure. The goal of this intervention is to mitigate racial disparities in shared decision making.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Tracheostomy, Decision Capacity, Extubation, Others
106 Participants Needed
Why Other Patients Applied
"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."
AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50
"I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."
ZS
Depression PatientAge: 51
"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."
FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31
"I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."
ID
Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40
"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."
HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78
HFNC vs NIPPV for Congenital Heart Disease Post-Surgery
Atlanta, Georgia
This study has the goal to determine the best method of respiratory support following extubation after cardiac surgery (CS). After cardiac surgery for Congenital Heart Disease (CHD), patients remain intubated until the cardiac team determines it is safe for the patient to undergo a trial of extubation. Two common methods of respiratory support following extubation are High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV). There is currently a gap in data comparing High Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in infants (age 0-1) in regard to extubation failure and overall outcomes.
This study will monitor the health outcomes of 200 infants (0 - 1 year) with CHD following cardiac surgery in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA). This will be done by assigning the respiratory support method each child will receive following extubation after cardiac surgery. Health outcomes will be monitored until discharge or until the second instance of extubation failure.
Both study arms are standard-of-care respiratory support methods in the CHOA CICU. The investigators aim to determine which of these two methods has fewer risk factors when used with infants.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:< 1
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Tracheostomy, ECMO, Low Birth Weight, Others
200 Participants Needed
Peripheral Vasopressors for Intensive Care Unit Patients
Kingston, Ontario
Using medications to increase blood pressure, called vasopressors, is invaluable in treating patients who have difficulty maintaining stable blood pressure. Vasopressors are usually infused through a central venous catheter (CVC), which is a flexible tube placed in the large vein of the neck, arm or groin. CVCs require a skilled clinician and often with an ultrasound to prevent complications such as a collapsed lung or bleeding. Alternatively, the infusion of vasopressors through a peripheral venous catheter (PVC), a thin tube placed in the smaller veins of the arm or hand has been avoided due to the risk of extravasation, which is the leakage of fluid to surrounding tissues. This can lead to potential tissue death requiring surgery. However, emerging research shows the safety of infusing vasopressors through a PVC, referred to as peripheral vasopressors. There is a growing interest in peripheral vasopressors for two main reasons: to expedite vasopressor initiation in patients with refractory shock and to avoid CVC placement and its potential complications. However, a standardized protocol for administration is lacking and many clinicians still avoid peripheral vasopressors due to lack of high-quality evidence. The investigators will examine the effectiveness of implementing a peripheral vasopressor protocol by conducting a feasibility study and assessing outcomes such as the safety of peripheral vasopressors and the acceptability rate of healthcare providers. By conducting this study, the investigators aim to provide the framework to conduct larger, multi-center trials and to provide high-quality data for the future use of a standardized peripheral vasopressor protocol.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Dialysis, Pregnancy, Others
Must Be Taking:Vasopressors
50 Participants Needed
Follow-Up Care for Critical Illness
Kingston, Ontario
\~80% of ICU survivors experience profound long-term cognitive, physical, and psychiatric impairments known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Caregivers additionally experience similar detrimental psychosocial effects following discharge. Despite this knowledge, follow-up care is almost non-existent. ICU follow-up clinics may mitigate these long-term impacts, but lack evaluation of their effectiveness. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of ICU follow-up clinics vs. standard-of-care in improving qualitative/clinical outcomes of ICU survivors and caregivers, with those receiving follow-up care hypothesized to have improved outcomes.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Neurological, Communication, English, Consent, Others
40 Participants Needed
Suvorexant for Sleep Disorders in ICU Patients
Bronx, New York
Investigators will evaluate the efficacy of postoperative oral suvorexant treatment on nighttime wakefulness after persistent sleep onset (WASO) among adult cardiac surgical patients recovering in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). The study include patients ≥ 60 years old undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), with or without valve surgery (aortic or mitral). Patients will receive either oral suvorexant or placebo for 7 nights starting the night after extubation. The primary hypothesis is that suvorexant compared with placebo decreases WASO, as measured by a specialized electroencephalogram (EEG), the SedLine monitor, during the first night in the cardiac ICU. Investigators will also assess total sleep time (TST), time to sleep onset (TSO), and postoperative delirium and delirium-free days.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Age:60+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Renal Failure, Liver Failure, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Benzodiazepines, Antidepressants
120 Participants Needed
Surfactant Therapy for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Hartford, Connecticut
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is the use of ultrasound by the bedside provider in real time to answer a specific question and guide medical management. POCUS can be used to diagnose the severity of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) through a lung ultrasound score. Lung ultrasound scores have also been shown to predict if an infant is treated with an initial dose of surfactant. Therefore, using lung ultrasound scores to guide surfactant therapy for RDS will likely lead to earlier surfactant therapy and may improve short-term respiratory outcomes. This study will test this theory by comparing lung ultrasound score-guided surfactant therapy for premature infants with RDS with our current surfactant administration guidelines.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:0 - 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Congenital Cardiac, Lung Disease, Others
52 Participants Needed
Positive Audio Suggestions for Critical Illness-Related Stress
Rochester, Minnesota
The purpose of this study is to assess the use of an audio recording containing positive suggestion as a means to provide needed psychological support to critically ill patients in a feasible and reliable manner.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Dementia, Psychotic Disorders, Hearing Impairment, Others
300 Participants Needed
NGAGE Tool for Family Engagement
Montréal, Quebec
The primary aim of this trial is to evaluate if the NGAGE tool improves care engagement in family members of ICU patients. The secondary objectives are to assess if the NGAGE tool improves communication, care satisfaction, psychological symptoms, and quality of life in family members of ICU patients.
The NGAGE trial is a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of 6 Canadian adult ICUs, involving 194 family members. A family member will be considered anyone with a biological, emotional, or legal relationship with the patient and whom the patient wishes to be involved in their care. There will be random and sequential crossover of clusters from control (phase 1) to intervention (phase 2) until all clusters are exposed. The intervention group will have access to the NGAGE tool, which has modules to Learn, Engage, and Report. "Engage" allows the family member to indicate their desired engagement activity, which is then transmitted to the treating healthcare team to provide the requested activity. "Learn" contains educational capsules about the ICU environment and information about care participation. "Report" allows the family member to provide real-time feedback to the healthcare team. The primary endpoint is the FAMily Engagement (FAME) score within 1 week of ICU discharge. Secondary endpoints are family-centered outcomes, including communication quality, satisfaction, and mental health (anxiety and depression) scores within 1 week of ICU discharge, and quality of life and mental health (anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic distress symptoms) at 6 months. The mean difference of the validated FAME score, a continuous variable, will be compared between groups.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Non-participation In Care, Repeat Admissions, Others
194 Participants Needed
Family Participation for Intensive Care Engagement
Montreal, Quebec
Family inclusion in adult intensive care unit (ICU) rounds is recommended by critical care professional societies, yet widespread uptake of this practice is limited. A key barrier cited by ICU clinicians is insufficient evidence to support this practice. There is a need for robust evidence to support family participation in adult ICU rounds and influence change to routine clinical care. The primary purpose of this study is to assess whether family participation in adult ICU rounds improves family engagement in care. The secondary objectives are to assess family satisfaction, and anxiety and depression, to explore user experiences of family participation in ICU rounds, and to evaluate strategies to improve family member recruitment and retention rates. This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (n=194) at 6 Canadian ICUs. The stepped wedge cluster randomized trial is a pragmatic study design that overcomes methodological limitations in evaluating a healthcare service delivery intervention. In the stepped-wedge cluster design, there is random and sequential crossover of clusters from control (phase 1) to intervention (phase 2) until all clusters are exposed. The stepped-wedge design also allows each site to function as its own control. The stepped-wedge design is more powerful than a parallel design when substantial cluster level effects are present.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Repeat Admissions, Others
194 Participants Needed
Gastric Ultrasound for Surgery Patients
Lebanon, New Hampshire
This is a case series study using gastric ultrasound in critically ill patients to quantify gastric residual volumes to compare the efficacy of different NPO protocols.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
50 Participants Needed
Virtual Peer Support for Caregiver Burden
Montreal, Quebec
The goal of this pilot study is to learn if virtual peer support groups and strengths-based skills training can help family caregivers of ICU survivors providing ongoing support to ICU survivors after hospital discharge. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Are virtual peer support groups and/or strengths-based skills support feasible and acceptable for family caregivers of ICU survivors? Researchers will compare the intervention group (virtual peer support groups or strengths-based skills training) to the control group (no intervention) to see if the interventions improve caregiver outcomes and assess feasibility and acceptability.
Participants will:
* Participate in either virtual peer support groups or strengths-based skills training sessions (if assigned to the intervention arm).
* Provide feedback on the feasibility and acceptability of the interventions (if assigned to the intervention arm).
* Complete surveys and follow-up questionnaires (either online or by phone) to measure outcomes.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Another Family Member, Language Barrier
60 Participants Needed
Know someone looking for new options?
Spread the word
Learn More About Power
We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.
Bask GillCEO at Power
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do Intensive Care Unit clinical trials pay?
Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.
How do Intensive Care Unit clinical trials work?
After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Intensive Care Unit trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Intensive Care Unit is 12 months.
How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?
Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.
What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?
The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.
Do I need to be insured to participate in a Intensive Care Unit medical study?
Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.
What are the newest Intensive Care Unit clinical trials?
Most recently, we added Virtual Peer Support for Caregiver Burden, Shared Decision Making Intervention for Healthcare Inequalities and Transitional Care and Support for Critical Illness to the Power online platform.
Popular Searches
By Condition
By Location
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.