Condition
Suggested Conditions
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Weight Loss
- Heart Disease
- Cancer
- Asthma
Location
Search Clinical Trials
Conditions
Locations
Treatment Type
Trial Phase
Trial Status
Paid Participation
Clear All
17 Heat Stress Trials Near You
Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Heat Stress patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.
Learn More About PowerEstradiol and Elagolix for Menopause
University Park, Pennsylvania
The frequency and severity of heat waves has increased in the last decades. Older adults (over 65 years) have impaired responses to heat stress making them at increased risk for adverse events. Previous heat waves report that women over 65 experience worse health outcomes than any other age group and age matched men.
Aging and reproductive hormones, specifically estrogen, independently alter responses to heat stress. However, the combined effects of low estrogen following menopause and aging on the response to heat stress are unknown. In this study, the investigators will identify the role of estrogen in pre and post menopausal women on thermoregulatory responses to heat stress.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Age:42 - 64
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Chron's, Diverticulitis, Tobacco, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Hormone Therapy, Hormonal Contraceptives
24 Participants Needed
Thermal Tolerance Assessment for Aging Adults
University Park, Pennsylvania
This study evaluates critical environmental limits (temperature and humidity) above which older adults are unable to effectively thermoregulate. Participants will exercise in a series of different environmental conditions to identify combinations of temperature and humidity above which age-related physiological changes cause uncompensable heat stress, resulting in increased risk of heat illness.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Early Phase 1
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Thermoregulatory Drugs, Cardiovascular Drugs
190 Participants Needed
Cold-Water Immersion for Heat Stress in Older Adults
University Park, Pennsylvania
The earth's climate is warming, and the number of heat waves has increased in recent years. At the same time, the number of adults over the age of 65 is growing. Humans sweat and increase blood flow to the skin to cool their body when they get hot. Older adults do not do this as well as young adults. This makes it harder to safely be in warm and/or humid conditions. It is important to learn about cooling strategies for older adults to safely be in warm and/or humid conditions.
There is compelling evidence that intermittent hand and forearm cold-water immersion effectively reduces the rise of core temperature during heat stress in older adults. However, it is still unknown if this is an effective cooling strategy for older adults. Furthermore, our laboratory has shown that folic acid supplementation improves blood flow responses in older adults. This may be beneficial to older adults during heat stress.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:65 - 100
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Chron's, Diverticulitis, Tobacco, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Antiepileptics, Methotrexate
20 Participants Needed
Heating Pad for High Blood Pressure
Nashville, Tennessee
Patients with autonomic failure are characterized by disabling orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure on standing), and at least half of them also have high blood pressure while lying down (supine hypertension). Exposure to heat, such as in hot environments, often worsens their orthostatic hypotension. The causes of this are not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether applying local heat over the abdomen of patients with autonomic failure and supine hypertension during the night would decrease their nocturnal high blood pressure while lying down. This will help us better understand the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, and may be of use in the treatment of supine hypertension.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Cardiac, Renal, Hepatic, Others
20 Participants Needed
Simulated Indoor Overheating for Heat Stress
Ottawa, Ontario
Laboratory-based studies show that exposure to high humidity can worsen the effects of heat stress in young and older adults by impeding sweat evaporation - the main mechanism by which the human body cools itself. At high levels of humidity, the efficiency of sweating decreases causing a greater rise core temperature and burden on the cardiovascular system. In this context, increasing temperatures and humidity with climate change thus pose a potential compound risk for human health. While humidity's role in heat-health outcomes could substantially alter projections of health burdens from climate change, the impact of humidity on physiological strain in vulnerable people in relation to the indoor environment has yet to be evaluated. In a recent study delineating the physiological effects of the proposed 26°C indoor upper limit (PMID: 38329752), relative humidity was set to 45% in all conditions based on indoor humidity standards by the American Society of Heating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. However, it is unknown whether a refinement of the recommended indoor temperature limit of 26°C is required in situations where humidity cannot be maintained at this level.
On separate occasions, the investigators will assess the change in body temperature and cardiovascular strain in older adults (65-85 years) exposed for 10 hours at the recommended indoor temperature limit of 26°C and 45% relative humidity (equivalent humidex of 29 (considered comfortable)) (experimental condition A), to 26°C with a relative humidity of 15% (equivalent humidex of 23 (considered comfortable); humidex is used to measure the perceived temperature taking into account the humidity)) (experimental condition B), to 26°C with a relative humidity of 85% (equivalent humidex of 37 (considered somewhat uncomfortable)) (experimental condition C), and to 31°C and 45% relative humidity with an equivalent humidex of 37 (considered somewhat uncomfortable) that is similar to experimental condition C. With this experimental design, investigators will assess the effects of indoor humidity in driving human heat strain and identify whether refinements in the recommended 26°C indoor temperature limit may be required. Further, by evaluating changes in relation to ambient conditions with a similar humidex, the investigators can assess how individuals perceive and respond to both heat and humidity.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:60 - 85
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Severe Hypoglycemia, Uncontrolled Hypertension, Cardiac Abnormalities, Others
10 Participants Needed
Temperature Control for Heat Stress
Ottawa, Ontario
A recent report showed that maintaining indoor temperature at or below 26°C safeguards older, heat vulnerable adults against potentially dangerous increases in thermal and cardiovascular strain during an extreme heat event (PMID: 38329752). However, this proposed limit does not consider the potential cumulative effect of successive days of heat exposure, which could lead to a progressive deterioration in thermoregulatory and cardiovascular function and necessitate adjustments to upper indoor temperature limits. Further, thermal comfort and quality of sleep may be negatively impacted when bedroom temperatures exceed 24°C (PMID: 3090680). On this basis, some health agencies have recommended that bedroom temperatures at night should not exceed 26°C unless ceiling fans are available (PMID: 3090680). Currently, however, it is unknown whether indoor overheating impairs sleep quality and physiological strain on a subsequent day in older adults and, if so, whether maintaining indoor temperature at 26°C is sufficient to prevent these adverse health impacts.
With rising global temperatures and more extreme heat events, energy management strategies to limit the strain on the power grid during the daytime are now increasingly commonplace. Thus, understanding the benefits of maintaining indoor temperature at the recommend upper limits of 26°C during the nighttime only on surrogate physiological indicators of health is an important step in understanding how to optimize protection for heat-vulnerable older adults when power outages occur.
The investigators will assess the efficacy of proposed indoor temperature limits (i.e., 26°C) in mitigating increases in core temperature and cardiovascular strain over three consecutive days (3 days, 2 nights) in older adults (60-85 years) with (indoor temperatures maintained at the recommend 26°C at all times throughout the three days) and without (daytime temperature fixed at 34°C (temperature experienced in homes without air-conditioning during an extreme heat event) with nighttime temperature at 26°C) access to daytime cooling. By quantifying the effect of daylong indoor overheating on surrogate physiological outcomes linked with heat-related mortality and morbidity in older adults, the investigators can determine if refinements in the recommended upper temperature threshold is required, including best practices when power outages may occur during an extreme heat event.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:65 - 85
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Severe Hypoglycemia, Uncontrolled Hypertension, Serious Diabetes Complications, Cardiac Abnormalities, Others
12 Participants Needed
Simulated Heat Exposure for Heat Stress
Ottawa, Ontario
The likelihood of exposure to overheated indoor environments is increasing as climate change is exacerbating the frequency and severity of hot weather and extreme heat events. Prolonged exposure to excessive heat stress can result in a deterioration in physiological function leading to a myriad of pathophysiological conditions (e.g., heat exhaustion, acute kidney injury, adverse cardiovascular events, heat stroke) that if left untreated can lead to death. While the relationship between extreme heat events and human health has been assessed in relation to outdoor exposure to high heat conditions, relatively little is known about the effects of daylong exposures to indoor overheating on the body's physiology.
In this study, investigators will examine the change in physiological responses (i.e., thermal, cardiovascular) in young (18-35 years) adults exposed to successive days and nights of high indoor temperatures typical of conditions recording in dwellings without air conditioning during the 2021 Western Heat Dome. Specifically, study participants will be housed in a large environmental chamber (outfitted with bed, work space, sitting area, kitchen and bathroom) for three successive days (three days and two nights) while exposed to indoor overheating where daytime temperatures will be maintained at 36°C (45% relative humidity; note: 36°C, temperatures experienced in homes without air-conditioning) for a 10-hour daytime exposure period (DAYTIME: defined as the time period from 9:00 to 19:00). For the nighttime exposure period (NIGHTTIME: defined as the time period from 19:00 to 9:00), participants will be exposed to nighttime temperatures fixed at 31°C (45% relative humidity; note: reductions in indoor temperatures during the nighttime in large urban centers range between 4-6°C). Participants will be permitted to move freely throughout the day in the chamber, but will be restricted from performing any physical activity except for the completion of a battery of tests (cardiovascular, cognitive and posture assessments performed prior to (as performed between 7:00 and 9:00) and the end (as performed between 17:00 and 19:00) of the daytime exposure). During the nighttime period, participants will be permitted to move freely until they decide to go to bed.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 35
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Chronic Health Conditions, Endurance Trained, Others
10 Participants Needed
Cooling Strategies for Heat Stress
Ottawa, Ontario
Occupational heat stress directly threatens workers' ability to live healthy and productive lives. Heat exposed workers are at an elevated risk of experiencing impaired work performance and cognitive function leading to a greater risk of work-related injuries which includes traumatic injury and a myriad of pathophysiological conditions (e.g., heat stroke, acute kidney injury, adverse cardiovascular events). To mitigate the adverse health effects of occupational heat stress, safety organizations recommend upper limits for heat stress, typically defined by a worker's metabolic rate and the prevailing wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT). In instances where the heat load created by the combination of work intensity, environment, and clothing worn exceed the upper heat stress limits (uncompensable heat stress), controls such as rest breaks are prescribed to limit increases in core temperature beyond recommended limits. While workers are encouraged to find shelter from the heat during a rest break, it is not always possible or feasible. Typically, workers may rest while remaining exposed to the heat, recover in a shaded area or rest in an air-conditioned room or vehicle. However, the effectiveness of these cooling strategies in mitigating the level of physiological strain experienced by the worker during prolonged work in a hot environment remains unclear. In this project, the investigators will assess the efficacy of the different cooling strategies in preventing excursions in core temperature beyond recommended limits (38.0°C) following the initial stay time for moderate-intensity work in hot ambient conditions (WBGT of 29°C; represents hot outdoor conditions experienced by workers in summers in Ontario, Canada) in context of the prescribed American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) work-to-rest allocation for unacclimated adults. On three separate days, participants will walk on a treadmill at a fixed metabolic rate of 200 W/m2 until core temperature reaches and/or exceeds 38.0°C or until volitional fatigue. Thereafter, participants will complete an additional 180 min work bout employing the recommended ACGIH work-to-rest allocation of 1:3 (starting with a 45 min rest break followed by a 15 min work bout, with the cycle repeated three times over the 180 min work simulation bout) without (Control) or with cooling mitigation during each 15-min break consisting of either: i) partial cooling equivalent to sitting in a shaded space (WBGT 24°C; 31.7°C and 35% RH) such as under a tree with a light breeze (simulated with pedestal fan fixed at \~2 m/s) or ii) full cooling equivalent to sitting in air-conditioned space (e.g., room or vehicle) maintained at 22°C and 35% RH (equivalent WBGT of 16°C).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Sex:Male
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Diabetes, Hypertension, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Antidepressants, Antihistamines, Diuretics
20 Participants Needed
Pre-Cooling for Heat Stress
Ottawa, Ontario
Endurance exercise performance declines in hot environments as core body temperature increases. To enhance performance, body pre-cooling strategies, such as cold-water immersion have been employed to lower resting core temperature thereby increasing the body's heat storage capacity. In turn, the increase in body core temperature associated with exercise in the heat is blunted, allowing the individual to exercise at higher intensity and or for a longer period of time. However, the mechanisms by which pre-cooling impacts heat exchange during exercise remain unclear. While existing research has focused on the performance benefits of pre-cooling the body, relatively little is known about the impacts of pre-cooling on whole-body heat exchange during an exercise-heat stress. Investigators will therefore evaluate whole-body heat exchange (dry ± evaporative heat loss as assessed using a direct air calorimeter) during a prolonged (1-hour) moderate-intensity cycling bout in the heat (wet-bulb globe temperature of 29°C; equivalent to 37.5°C, 35% relative humidity) performed with and without pre-cooling by cool-water (\~17°C) immersion.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 30
Sex:Male
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Chronic Diseases, Acute Illness, Sedentary, Others
10 Participants Needed
Work Duration for Heat Stress
Ottawa, Ontario
Workplaces rely on upper heat stress limits provided by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) to manage the health and safety of workers in hot environments. This is primarily achieved by interspersing work with rest periods, the length of which is dictated by environmental conditions and work intensity, to maintain core temperature at or below 38.0°C (equivalent to a 1°C increase in body core temperature above resting levels). However, these guidelines employ a "one size fits all" approach to exposure limits that does not consider individual variation (e.g., age) between workers. Moreover, they fail to provide direction on the safe, initial stay times before these heat-mitigation controls should be employed (i.e., rest breaks) in conditions exceeding upper heat stress limits. While recent work has generated estimates of the initial stay times for young to older men before heat-mitigation controls are required for moderate-intensity work, information on initial stay times for heavy-intensity work remains to be assessed. This project will assess the initial stay times for heavy-intensity work for a single work bout as well as for a second work bout that is preceded by an extended rest period such as a lunch break and a work bout performed on the next day to determine if refinements in initial stay times across these periods may be required. Further, the investigators will evaluate if the application of recommended work-rest allocations thereafter would alleviate increases in core temperature for the duration of the work period (e.g., start of shift versus post-lunch period). Given the known age-differences in heat loss that can modulate core temperature regulation during an exercise-heat stress, the investigators will assess responses response in young and older adults.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Sex:Male
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Diabetes, Hypertension, Hot Environment Exposure
Must Not Be Taking:Antidepressants, Antihistamines, Diuretics
20 Participants Needed
Alcohol Consumption for Heat Stress
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Climate change has significantly increased the earth's average surface temperature and heat waves have been predicted to increase in frequency, intensity and duration. Extreme heat events have increased the susceptibility to heat-related illnesses, such as heat exhaustion, heat stroke or death. Heat health action plans have been designed to advertise cooling behaviours to mitigate physiological strain. Heat health action plans suggest avoiding alcohol consumption during extreme heat as it may increase dehydration and impair behavioural or physiological temperature regulation and thermal perception. Regardless of these messages, alcohol sales continue to remain high during the summer months year after year, and 1/5 of adults identify alcohol as a hydration strategy during extreme heat events. A recent scoping review investigating the effects of alcohol and heat has demonstrated that acute alcohol consumption does not negatively influence thermoregulation, hydration, or hormone markers of fluid balance in the heat compared to a control fluid (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-024-01113-y). Further, alcohol consumption may elicit sex- and age-specific alterations in physiological and perceptual responses, neither of which have been explored.
Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively evaluate how alcohol consumption systematically alters physiological responses and perceptions during conditions similar to those experienced indoors during extreme heat events in younger and older adults.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:19+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, Diabetes, Others
34 Participants Needed
Heat Stress Effects on Firefighter Injury Risk
Shreveport, Louisiana
This study will examine the effect of heat stress on factors that influence musculoskeletal injury risk in firefighters. Participants will attend 4 data collection sessions. 1: informed consent, screening, and familiarization. 2: pre-tests (strength, balance, and movement quality). 3: heat stress (rapid or gradual) followed by post-tests (strength, balance, and movement quality). 4: heat stress (rapid or gradual) followed by post-tests.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 57
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Recent Injury, Pregnancy, Others
28 Participants Needed
Beta Blockers for Heat Stress
Dallas, Texas
This study will test the hypothesis that the drugs propranolol and metoprolol will result in greater increases in core body temperature during 3 hours of extreme heat exposure in older adults.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4
Age:65+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cancer, Diabetes, Neurological Diseases, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Cardiac Drugs, Sweat Inhibitors
22 Participants Needed
Exercise + Heat Stress for Cardiometabolic Health
Flagstaff, Arizona
Life in space is completely void of physical and environmental stress. It is well known that living things need regular physical stress (e.g. exercise) to remain strong, functional and healthy. More and more research is showing that regular environmental stress, for example heat and hypoxia, can further improve physical health. Astronauts aboard the international space station (ISS) exercise for 1-2 hours every day to avoid physical deconditioning that would otherwise cause them to age rapidly in space. Although physical exercise is very effective in remedying this deconditioning, today's astronauts still have physiological changes that indicate accelerated aging. This is a cause for concern given NASA's priority to travel to mars within the next decade; a mission that will require at least double the duration in space for our astronauts. The investigators think that the complete absence of environmental stress, i.e., heat, may be contributing to the accelerated aging that occurs during spaceflight. Our study will assess the health effects of adding heat stress to exercise that could be performed in space by astronauts. The goal is to inform best practice for astronauts to avoid physical deconditioning during long-duration spaceflight. This information will also be relevant to life on earth as spaceflight is a model of inactivity here on earth. Therefore, the potential benefits of adding heat stress will likely translate to life in space and on earth.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 50
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Smokers, Asthma, Obesity, Alcoholism, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Anti-arrhythmogenics, Inhalers
15 Participants Needed
Education and Resources for Heat Stress
El Centro, California
The investigators are studying the dangers that farmworkers face while working in the fields and at home. The investigators goals are:
1. Measure how much heat and chemicals farmworkers in Imperial County are exposed to.
The investigators will ask the participants to wear a special belt under their clothes during work to measure heat. The investigators will also put two small temperature monitors in the participant's home for a day. The investigators will collect a urine sample to check hydration, and also measure the participants height, weight, blood pressure, and some blood markers for diseases using a simple finger-prick test.
To measure chemicals, the investigators will give the participants a wristband to wear for a week and hang another in the participants home. The investigators will also collect dust from each participant's home with a vacuum. Then, the investigators will analyze everything at San Diego State University.
After collecting samples, a trained community health worker will ask the participants a few questions about their work, lifestyle, health symptoms, and any hazards they face. The investigators will meet the participants twice at their homes to distribute the tools which will later be collected. Once the tools are collected, the investigators will have the chance to follow up with the participants if they have any questions.
2. Provide help to lower heat and chemical exposure with the help of community health workers.
3. Measure heat and chemicals again using the same methods to see if the project made a difference.
4. Talk to participants about what they liked and how the investigators can make future projects better.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Living In Imperial County
60 Participants Needed
Nerve Fiber Stimulation for Alcoholism
Seattle, Washington
CT fibers are found in the skin of most mammals and project to the insular cortex. Stimulation of CT fibers by light touch causes a release of oxytocin and is associated with feelings of comfort and wellbeing. Peripheral TRPV-1 channels are important in pain transmission and modulation of the stress response likely through the central release of oxytocin and are stimulated by heat. In Phase 1 investigators will test stimulation of TRPV1 channels and CT fibers in human subjects to correlate the lab findings with subjective human responses and test whether stimulation of CT fibers and TRPV-1 channels reduce anxiety and stress in subjects who suffer from AUD. Aim 1 and 2. We will define the optimal parameters for CT fiber stimulation for force, temperature, and body location. We will perform similar testing for peripheral thermal stimulation (TRPV-1) using our commercially available heating pods. Parameters tested will include the optimal body location, number of heating pods (2-4) and temperature of pods. In Aim 3 investigators will simultaneously apply both CT fiber and thermal stimulation in a proof of concept study. The experimental group will receive active CT fiber and thermal stimulation and the control group non-physiologic placebo stimulation. Subjects with a history of AUD will be randomized into control versus experimental groups and undergo stress using a validated mental calculation stressors. Stress, cravings, and anxiety will be measured using standardized assessments, and investigators will measure salivary oxytocin and cortisol levels, potentially biomarkers.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
36 Participants Needed
Cooling Solutions for Hyperthermia
Palo Alto, California
The investigators aim to test the effectiveness of two cooling interventions in reducing the core temperature of outdoor workers.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pacemaker, Pregnancy, Gastrointestinal Disorders, Others
30 Participants Needed
Why Other Patients Applied
"As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."
IZ
Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38
"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."
HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78
"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."
WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58
"I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."
ZS
Depression PatientAge: 51
"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."
AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50
Know someone looking for new options?
Spread the word
Learn More About Power
We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.
Bask GillCEO at Power
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do Heat Stress clinical trials pay?
Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.
How do Heat Stress clinical trials work?
After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Heat Stress trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Heat Stress is 12 months.
How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?
Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.
What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?
The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.
Do I need to be insured to participate in a Heat Stress medical study?
Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.
What are the newest Heat Stress clinical trials?
Most recently, we added Cooling Solutions for Hyperthermia, Simulated Indoor Overheating for Heat Stress and Estradiol and Elagolix for Menopause to the Power online platform.
Popular Searches
By Condition
By Location
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.