190 Participants Needed

Thermal Tolerance Assessment for Aging Adults

LM
Overseen ByLacy M Alexander, Ph.D.
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This study evaluates critical environmental limits (temperature and humidity) above which older adults are unable to effectively thermoregulate. Participants will exercise in a series of different environmental conditions to identify combinations of temperature and humidity above which age-related physiological changes cause uncompensable heat stress, resulting in increased risk of heat illness.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

You may need to stop taking medications that affect thermoregulatory or cardiovascular responses to exercise, as these are part of the exclusion criteria.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

You may need to stop taking medications that affect how your body handles heat or exercise, as these are excluded from the trial.

What data supports the idea that Thermal Tolerance Assessment for Aging Adults is an effective treatment?

The available research does not provide specific data supporting the effectiveness of Thermal Tolerance Assessment for Aging Adults as a treatment. Instead, the studies focus on the placebo effect and its impact on clinical trials, suggesting that patient expectations can influence perceived effectiveness. This means that the belief in receiving an active treatment can lead to improved outcomes, even if the treatment itself is not directly effective. Therefore, while the research highlights the importance of managing expectations in trials, it does not offer direct evidence of the treatment's effectiveness for its intended use.12345

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug used in the Thermal Tolerance Assessment for Aging Adults trial?

The research highlights the significant impact of placebo effects in clinical trials, suggesting that patient expectations can influence perceived effectiveness. This implies that the effectiveness of treatments like aspirin (Acetylsalicylic acid) may be enhanced by positive patient expectations, as seen in other studies where placebo effects were substantial.12345

What safety data exists for the treatment involving aspirin or similar substances?

The provided research does not contain specific safety data for aspirin or its variants (such as Low dose ASA, Acetylsalicylic acid) in the context of thermal tolerance assessment for aging adults. The studies focus on other substances like TRPV1 antagonist, celecoxib, capsaicin, and indomethacin, none of which directly relate to aspirin or its safety profile in this context.678910

Is the treatment 'Control' (Placebo, Standard Care) promising for helping older adults with thermal tolerance?

The treatment 'Control' (Placebo, Standard Care) is promising because it helps us understand how older adults respond to temperature changes. This understanding can lead to better ways to improve their comfort and sleep quality, as older adults often have reduced sensitivity to temperature changes, which can affect their sleep and overall well-being.1112131415

How does the placebo treatment in the Thermal Tolerance Assessment for Aging Adults differ from other treatments?

The placebo treatment in this trial serves as a control to compare against any active interventions, focusing on standard care without additional therapeutic effects. This approach helps researchers understand the natural progression of thermal tolerance in aging adults without the influence of new treatments.1112131415

Research Team

WL

W. Larry Kenney, Ph.D.

Principal Investigator

The Pennsylvania State University

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults aged 18 and older, with a focus on those who are healthy and show no signs of disease. Women must have regular menstrual cycles. Participants over 40 need doctor approval. Excluded are those on certain meds, with exercise restrictions, pregnant women, or with a history of serious diseases like cancer or diabetes.

Inclusion Criteria

I feel fine and show no signs of my condition according to exercise guidelines.
I am a premenopausal woman with regular menstrual cycles.
I am 18 or older. If I'm 40+, a doctor has approved my participation.

Exclusion Criteria

I am not on medications that affect my body's response to heat or exercise.
I have a history of Crohn's disease, diverticulitis, or a similar gut condition.
Any contraindications to low intensity physical activity on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
See 5 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Critical Environmental Limits

Subjects perform exercise with increasing ambient temperature or humidity until core temperature begins to rise

2 hours per visit
Multiple visits (in-person)

Aspirin Supplementation

After a minimum of 7 days of daily, low-dose aspirin ingestion, subjects repeat critical environmental limits trials

7 days of aspirin ingestion, followed by 2 hours per visit
Multiple visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Control
  • Low dose ASA
Trial OverviewThe study tests how well older adults can handle heat by having them exercise in various temperatures and humidity levels. The goal is to find the environmental limits where aging bodies struggle to regulate temperature, increasing the risk of heat-related illnesses.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Critical Environmental LimitsExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Subjects will perform exercise at \~200-300W with ambient temperature or humidity increasing every 5 min throughout the trial until core temperature begins to rise.
Group II: Aspirin SupplementationExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
After a minimum of 7 days of daily, low-dose aspirin ingestion, older subjects will repeat critical environmental limits trials. As before, subjects will perform exercise at \~200-300W with ambient temperature or humidity increasing every 5 min throughout the trial until core temperature begins to rise.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Penn State University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
380
Recruited
131,000+

Findings from Research

In a study involving 144 healthy volunteers, it was found that the expectation of receiving an active drug significantly influenced pain thresholds, with those believing they received the active treatment reporting higher thresholds, highlighting the impact of patient expectations on trial outcomes.
The use of active placebos that induce minor sensations can complicate the interpretation of results in clinical trials, as they create different expectations compared to inert placebos, suggesting that new study designs are needed to better account for these effects.
The hidden effects of blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trials: an experimental investigation.Rief, W., Glombiewski, JA.[2021]
The placebo effect in clinical trials has been increasing, making it harder to demonstrate the effectiveness of treatments that target biological mechanisms, which poses challenges for trial reliability.
By applying insights from placebo and nocebo research, such as the impact of verbal suggestions and emotional expectations, researchers can better understand and manage the variability of placebo effects and improve trial designs to maintain blinding.
Nocebo vs. placebo: the challenges of trial design in analgesia research.Vase, L., Amanzio, M., Price, DD.[2015]
Using active-comparator trials instead of placebo-controlled trials can leave more participants acutely ill, as these trials require larger sample sizes to detect smaller differences between treatments.
The article suggests a trial design that randomizes more participants to the investigational treatment, which could reduce the number of nonresponders while still minimizing the use of placebo, making the study more appealing to participants and ethical review boards.
Toward rapproachment in the placebo control debate. A calculated compromise of power.Leon, AC., Solomon, DA.[2007]

References

The hidden effects of blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trials: an experimental investigation. [2021]
Nocebo vs. placebo: the challenges of trial design in analgesia research. [2015]
Toward rapproachment in the placebo control debate. A calculated compromise of power. [2007]
What techniques might be used to harness placebo effects in non-malignant pain? A literature review and survey to develop a taxonomy. [2021]
What can be done to control the placebo response in clinical trials? A narrative review. [2023]
Comparison of orofacial thermal sensitivity assessed with simple devices and sophisticated equipment. [2019]
Progressive Response to Repeat Application of Capsaicin 179 mg (8% w/w) Cutaneous Patch in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Comprehensive New Analysis and Clinical Implications. [2021]
Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing of the hand in a cohort of young, healthy adults. [2022]
Indomethacin reduces the skin thermal damage in hyperthermic treatment of experimental malignant tumors. [2013]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, 3-way cross-over human experimental pain study of a TRPV1 antagonist (V116517) in healthy volunteers and comparison with preclinical profile. [2021]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Age-related decline in thermal adaptation capacities: an evoked potentials study. [2014]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Peripheral thermal responsivity to facial cooling during sleep. [2019]
The effects of heat stress on physical functioning in persons with multiple sclerosis. [2012]
14.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Diminished capability to recognize the optimal temperature for sleep initiation may contribute to poor sleep in elderly people. [2022]
Lower thermal sensation in normothermic and mildly hyperthermic older adults. [2018]