Waterproof Padding vs Non-waterproof Padding for Short Leg Walking Casts
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial examines two types of padding for short leg walking casts to determine if waterproof padding increases cast-related problems in children. The researchers will compare waterproof padding to the standard non-waterproof kind, focusing on differences in complications. Children needing a short leg cast for ankle or foot fractures, sprains, toe-walking, tendonitis (inflammation of a tendon), or apophysitis (painful swelling where tendons attach to bone) may be suitable participants. As an unphased trial, this study provides an opportunity to enhance understanding of better options for children's cast comfort and safety.
Do I need to stop my current medications for this trial?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.
What prior data suggests that these padding methods are safe for use in short leg walking casts?
Research has shown that waterproof padding for casts is generally safe. Some studies found that only a small number of people experienced minor skin issues, such as irritation, with no major differences in problems compared to traditional non-waterproof padding.
For non-waterproof padding, studies also found no significant risks. People reported similar comfort and satisfaction levels as with waterproof padding.
Overall, both waterproof and non-waterproof paddings are well-tolerated, with no major safety concerns reported in studies.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores the potential benefits of waterproof padding in short leg walking casts compared to the traditional non-waterproof option. Waterproof padding allows patients to bathe and even swim without needing to cover the cast, which can significantly improve comfort and convenience during the recovery period. Additionally, this approach could reduce skin irritation and odor, common issues with non-waterproof casts. By comparing these two padding types, the trial aims to determine whether the waterproof option can enhance the overall patient experience without compromising the effectiveness of the cast.
What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for short leg walking casts?
This trial compares waterproof padding with non-waterproof padding for short leg walking casts. Research has shown that waterproof padding is generally safe, with only minor skin issues in a few cases. Studies found no major differences in problems between waterproof and non-waterproof casts. Participants using waterproof padding can wet their casts without damage, offering more convenience for activities like bathing. In contrast, those with non-waterproof padding must keep their casts dry. Both types of padding support healing in short leg walking casts.12346
Who Is on the Research Team?
David Tager, MD
Principal Investigator
West Virginia University
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for children who need a short leg walking cast due to conditions like ankle or foot fractures, sprains, toe-walking, tendinitis, or apophysitis. It's not suitable for those with pre-existing wounds on the foot or ankle or cognitive dysfunction that would interfere with the study.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants receive either a waterproof or non-waterproof short leg walking cast
Follow-up
Participants return for cast removal and complete questionnaires on cast and skin condition, satisfaction, and mobility
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Non-waterproof padding
- Waterproof padding
Trial Overview
The study is testing if waterproof padding in short leg walking casts reduces complications compared to standard non-waterproof casting. The goal is to see which type of padding better serves children during their recovery from lower leg injuries.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Active Control
Waterproof, short leg walking cast for 3-7 weeks
Non-waterproof, short leg walking cast for 3-7 weeks
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
West Virginia University
Lead Sponsor
Citations
Waterproof Casting Versus Standard Casting for Short Leg ...
The purpose of the study is to determine whether the use of waterproof padding in short leg walking casts will lead to an increase in cast-related complications ...
Waterproof Padding vs Non-waterproof Padding for Short ...
Research shows that waterproof padding for casts is generally safe, with minor skin issues reported in a small percentage of cases. Studies found no significant ...
Are Waterproof Casts More Cost Effective than Non-Water ...
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and costs of treatment of extremity injuries with non-waterproof casts (NWPC) ...
Traditional Versus Water-resistant Short Leg Casting
Results: Sixty patients were included in this study, thirty in each group. The water-resistant casts took longer to apply than the traditional ...
Lower Extremity Cast Application
In another recent study by Hennrikus et al., they confirmed that a short leg walking cast is an effective method for immobilizing childhood accidental spiral ...
Cast-Related Complications
When rolling cast padding on the extremity, there should be 50% overlap at a minimum so that there are at least two layers of the cast padding ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.