Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

(AWARE Trial)

Not currently recruiting at 11 trial locations
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial examines two methods of performing catheter ablation to treat atrial fibrillation (AF), a condition where the heart beats irregularly and too fast. The researchers aim to determine if adding extra ablation (destroying small areas of heart tissue) helps maintain a normal heart rhythm and reduces AF episodes. Participants will be divided into two groups: one will receive a standard procedure called wide area circumferential catheter ablation, while the other will undergo an experimental procedure known as the augmented-wide area circumferential ablation. Individuals who have experienced troublesome AF episodes and have not found relief from certain medications might be suitable for this study. Researchers will monitor participants for at least a year to track progress and any side effects. As an unphased trial, this study offers participants the chance to explore innovative treatment options that could improve their heart health.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, since participants must have AF that is not controlled by certain medications or cannot tolerate them, you might need to discuss your current medications with the study team.

What prior data suggests that these catheter ablation techniques are safe for atrial fibrillation?

Research shows that catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is generally well-tolerated. One study found that serious complications from AF ablation have decreased over time, suggesting the procedure is becoming safer as techniques improve.

Earlier studies have examined the safety and effectiveness of augmented-wide area circumferential ablation, comparing this new approach to the standard method. The results showed that both methods work well, and the new technique does not significantly increase risks.

Adenosine, used in the standard ablation procedure, is already approved for treating and diagnosing irregular heartbeats, indicating its well-established safety. Both procedures in the trial use equipment and supplies approved by Health Canada, further supporting their safety.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about the catheter ablation techniques being explored for atrial fibrillation because they offer potentially enhanced precision and effectiveness. The augmented-wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) is distinctive because it expands the treatment area, potentially leading to more comprehensive targeting of the heart tissue responsible for irregular heartbeats. Unlike the standard wide area circumferential catheter ablation, which is already a common procedure, the augmented approach aims to improve outcomes by reducing the likelihood of arrhythmia recurrence. This could mean fewer repeat procedures and better long-term results for patients.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for atrial fibrillation?

Research has shown that catheter ablation effectively treats atrial fibrillation (AF), a condition where the heart beats irregularly. This procedure uses a thin tube to deliver electrical energy to specific heart areas, destroying the tissue causing the irregular heartbeat. The usual technique involves creating a circular line around the pulmonary veins to restore a normal heart rhythm. Studies have found that with current methods, about 33% to 40% of patients may experience AF recurrence within a year. In this trial, one group will receive the standard wide area circumferential catheter ablation (WACA), while another group will receive an augmented version of this procedure. The new experimental approach adds an extra line of ablation without using the drug adenosine to see if it lowers the chance of AF recurrence. However, previous studies showed that this additional ablation does not significantly reduce AF recurrence compared to the standard method.12467

Who Is on the Research Team?

GN

Girish Nair, MD

Principal Investigator

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 18 with symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (AF) that's not responding to certain medications, or those who can't tolerate or prefer not to use these drugs. Participants must have had at least one AF episode confirmed by ECG and be able to consent. It excludes individuals with reversible causes of AF, significant heart valve disease, known clots in the heart, pregnancy, adverse reactions to adenosine, persistent/permanent AF, previous ablations for AF or those who can't take blood thinners.

Inclusion Criteria

At least one episode of AF documented on 12-lead ECG, Holter monitor or Loop recorder.
I have AFib that doesn't respond to or can't take certain heart rhythm medicines.
Subjects must be able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

You have had a bad reaction to adenosine in the past.
Subjects that are pregnant
I cannot take blood thinners due to a bad reaction or other reasons.
See 6 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo wide area circumferential catheter ablation (WACA) with or without augmented ablation lesions

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Blinding Period

Atrial tachyarrhythmias occurring during this period will be documented but not considered treatment failures

12 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment with follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months

12 months
3 visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Augmented-wide area circumferential ablation procedure
  • Wide area circumferential catheter ablation
Trial Overview The study compares two catheter ablation techniques for treating abnormal heart rhythm due to AF: standard wide area circumferential ablation using adenosine and an experimental approach adding extra ablation without adenosine. The goal is to see if more ablation reduces recurrence of AF. Participants are randomly assigned into two groups and followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months post-procedure.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Augmented- WACAExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: WACAActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Lead Sponsor

Trials
200
Recruited
95,800+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Catheter ablation is a standard and effective treatment for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), helping to restore normal heart rhythm.
The review covers the latest techniques and technologies used in AF catheter ablation, including different energy forms and procedural methods, ensuring comprehensive understanding for optimal patient outcomes.
[Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation : Status quo].Jilek, C., Lewalter, T.[2020]
In a study of 33 patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, significant reductions in left atrial (LA) size and function were observed, with LA volume decreasing by 15% and ejection fraction by 14% after the procedure.
The decrease in LA function was strongly correlated with the volume of scar tissue in the LA, suggesting that the extent of radiofrequency ablation may impact post-procedural risks, including thromboembolic events.
Left atrial function and scar after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.Wylie, JV., Peters, DC., Essebag, V., et al.[2016]
In a study of 2,323 patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, major complications occurred in 4.0% of cases, with vascular access complications being the most common.
Female patients and those with longer procedure times were found to have a higher risk of complications, indicating that these factors should be considered when assessing patient safety during catheter ablation.
Updated national multicenter registry on procedural safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.Bertaglia, E., Stabile, G., Pappone, A., et al.[2014]

Citations

CE-499647-003 AUGMENTED WIDE AREA ...The trial showed that double WACA did not result in additional benefit for preventing atrial arrhythmia (AA) including AF, atrial flutter, and atrial ...
Standard vs Augmented Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial ...However, even with contact force and adenosine testing to guide PVI, the 1-year recurrence rate of AF remains 33% to 40%. The Augmented Wide ...
3.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35219715/
Augmented wide area circumferential catheter ablation for ...The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia (AA; atrial tachycardia [AT], atrial flutter [AFl] or AF) recurrence between days 91 and 365 post ...
Augmented wide area circumferential catheter ablation for ...The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia (AA; atrial tachycardia [AT], atrial flutter [AFl] or AF) recurrence between days 91 and 365 post catheter ...
Standard vs Augmented Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial ...However, even with contact force and adenosine testing to guide PVI, the 1-year recurrence rate of AF remains 33% to 40%. The Augmented Wide ...
A Substudy of the AWARE Randomized Controlled TrialThe purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of a HPSD vs low-power long duration (LPLD) approach to PVI ...
Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Recent AdvancesA recent meta-analysis of 126 studies of AF ablation reported the following to have decreased over time (2000–2018 vs. 2019–2023): serious adverse complications ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security