60 Participants Needed

PAL to Improve Oral Feeding for Infants With Chronic Lung Disease

Age: < 18
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Missouri-Columbia
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 1 JurisdictionThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) intervention on the transition to oral feeding for preterm infants with chronic lung disease and respiratory distress syndrome that require non-invasive respiratory support at 34 weeks PMA. This study will utilize a clinical trial design. Participants will be randomized into two groups. One group will receive the PAL intervention, the other group serving as a no contact control. Participants will be matched based on sex, gestational age at birth, and neurologic injury. Infants in the intervention group will receive two PAL sessions a week until successfully transitioned to \<2L of respiratory support and then receive one PAL session within 24 hours of their first oral feeding attempt.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether participants need to stop taking their current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) for improving oral feeding in infants with chronic lung disease?

Research shows that using pacifiers and playing lullabies can help premature infants transition to full oral feeding more successfully and improve their sucking ability. Additionally, non-nutritive sucking with a pacifier has been found to positively affect the health and behavior of preterm infants.12345

Is the Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) intervention safe for use in infants?

The Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) intervention has been studied in premature infants and has not shown any significant safety concerns. Pacifier use, in general, is considered safe for infants and is associated with benefits like pain relief and reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome, though prolonged use may affect breastfeeding and dental health.26789

How is the Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) treatment different from other treatments for infants with chronic lung disease?

The Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) treatment is unique because it uses music to encourage non-nutritive sucking in premature infants, which helps them transition to oral feeding more quickly. This approach is different from other treatments as it combines a pacifier with music reinforcement to improve feeding skills, rather than relying solely on traditional feeding methods.1261011

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for preterm infants with chronic lung disease and respiratory distress syndrome who need non-invasive breathing support and can handle a little bit of sound. They should be born before 33 weeks of pregnancy and enrolled before reaching 35 weeks. Babies with certain bowel issues, on invasive breathing support, in other music therapy studies, or without any respiratory support are not eligible.

Inclusion Criteria

Approval from medical staff to begin intervention
My baby was born before reaching 33 weeks of pregnancy.
Medically stable to tolerate minimal levels of auditory stimulation
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

My infant is not involved in other music therapy studies.
Requiring no respiratory support
My infant has been diagnosed with a severe intestinal condition requiring surgery.
See 4 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Infants in the experimental group receive the PAL intervention 2 times a week until they transition to room air or <2L high flow nasal cannula and begin oral feeding attempts.

1-6 weeks
2 sessions per week

Control

Infants in the control group do not receive any music therapy intervention throughout NICU admission.

1-16 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, focusing on the transition to oral feeding and respiratory support.

1-8 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) intervention
Trial Overview The study tests the Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) system to see if it helps premature babies with lung problems start eating by mouth sooner. Infants will be randomly placed into two groups: one receiving PAL sessions twice weekly until they need less respiratory support, then once right before their first oral feeding; the other group won't get this intervention.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Intervention GroupExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Infants randomized in to the experimental group will receive the PAL intervention 2 times a week until the infant transitions to room air or \< 2L high flow nasal cannula and is able to begin attempting feeds by mouth. The PAL is an FDA cleared medical device that has a sensor that will connect to the infant's pacifier and can read the infant's suck. Then, the device plays music as positive reinforcement to help improve sucking skills. This intervention typically lasts about 15 minutes and is implemented while the infant is receiving gavage feeds.
Group II: Control GroupActive Control1 Intervention
Infants randomized in to the control group will not receive music therapy intervention throughout NICU admission.

Pacifier Activated Lullaby (PAL) intervention is already approved in United States for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Pacifier Activated Lullaby for:
  • Improving oral feeding in preterm infants with chronic lung disease and respiratory distress syndrome

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Missouri-Columbia

Lead Sponsor

Trials
387
Recruited
629,000+

University of Georgia

Collaborator

Trials
109
Recruited
43,500+

Findings from Research

In a study of 250 healthy babies, pacifier use was linked to a higher rate of early weaning, with 50.8% of pacifier users stopping breastfeeding by six months compared to only 22.4% of non-pacifier users.
The research found that nearly two-thirds of pacifier users stopped exclusive breastfeeding before two months, highlighting a significant association between pacifier use and reduced breastfeeding duration.
[Pacifier use and its relationship with early weaning in infants born at a Child-Friendly Hospital].Soares, ME., Giugliani, ER., Braun, ML., et al.[2020]
Premature infants who were given pacifiers transitioned to total oral feeding faster than those in the lullaby and control groups, indicating that pacifiers can significantly aid in this critical developmental stage.
The study also found that pacifiers improved sucking success in infants, suggesting that using pacifiers and lullabies can enhance feeding skills and positively impact vital signs like heart rate and oxygen saturation.
The effects of giving pacifiers to premature infants and making them listen to lullabies on their transition period for total oral feeding and sucking success.Yildiz, A., Arikan, D.[2022]
Oral motor interventions (OMIs), particularly nonnutritive sucking (NNS) and NNS combined with oral/perioral stimulation, showed strong positive effects on improving feeding and swallowing physiology in preterm infants, helping to reduce the time it takes for them to transition to oral feeding.
Despite some improvements in feeding physiology, none of the OMIs consistently resulted in significant weight gain or growth, highlighting the need for further research to establish their overall effectiveness and safety in clinical practice.
Evidence-based systematic review: effects of oral motor interventions on feeding and swallowing in preterm infants.Arvedson, J., Clark, H., Lazarus, C., et al.[2018]

References

[Pacifier use and its relationship with early weaning in infants born at a Child-Friendly Hospital]. [2020]
The effects of giving pacifiers to premature infants and making them listen to lullabies on their transition period for total oral feeding and sucking success. [2022]
Evidence-based systematic review: effects of oral motor interventions on feeding and swallowing in preterm infants. [2018]
Quality improvement study of effectiveness of cue-based feeding in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the neonatal intensive care unit. [2019]
Non-nutritive sucking for preterm infants in Egypt. [2022]
The effect of music reinforcement for non-nutritive sucking on nipple feeding of premature infants. [2019]
Effects of the pacifier activated lullaby on weight gain of premature infants. [2019]
Risks and benefits of pacifiers. [2022]
The clinical effect of pacifier use on orogastric tube-fed preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. [2020]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The effect of music-reinforced nonnutritive sucking on feeding rate of premature infants. [2019]
Effects of pacifier use on transition to full breastfeeding and sucking skills in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. [2018]