89 Participants Needed

Prescribing Improvement Strategies for Heart Failure

(Nudge Trial)

JR
EE
Overseen ByEric E Glenn
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This study addresses a critical gap of care for Veterans with heart failure (HF). Only 1/3 or fewer eligible Veterans are receiving recommended SGLT2 and MRA therapies that save lives and prevents HF hospitalizations. The investigators will compare the effect of clinician directed nudges as strategies to improve the health of Veterans with HF.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether participants need to stop taking their current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug Dapagliflozin in treating heart failure?

Research shows that Dapagliflozin, originally an antidiabetic drug, can reduce the risk of hospitalization and death from heart problems in patients with heart failure, making it an effective treatment option.12345

Is the treatment generally safe for humans?

Research shows that medications like dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and ertugliflozin, which are used for heart and kidney health, are generally safe. They have been studied in many patients and are linked to fewer serious health problems compared to not using them.13567

How does the drug empagliflozin differ from other treatments for heart failure?

Empagliflozin is unique because it is a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, which not only helps manage blood sugar levels but also reduces the risk of hospitalization and cardiovascular death in heart failure patients. This dual benefit makes it stand out compared to traditional heart failure treatments that primarily focus on heart function.2891011

Research Team

SD

Sandesh Dev, MD

Principal Investigator

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for primary care and cardiology clinicians at the Southern AZ VA Health Care System who work in outpatient clinics. Clinicians still in training, like residents or fellows, cannot participate.

Inclusion Criteria

This criterion includes primary care and cardiology clinicians who work in the outpatient clinic setting at the Southern AZ VA Health Care System.

Exclusion Criteria

Clinicians who are in training status (resident, fellow) will be excluded.

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Intervention

Clinicians receive informational alerts and peer comparison feedback to improve prescribing of SGLT2 and MRA therapies for heart failure patients

6 months
Ongoing clinician interactions via secure email and alerts

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after intervention

30 days

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Informational Nudge
Trial OverviewThe study tests two methods to encourage better prescription practices for heart failure: a peer comparison report and an alert system. It aims to see if these 'nudges' can improve the health of Veterans by increasing the use of life-saving SGLT2 and MRA therapies.
Participant Groups
4Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: ControlActive Control1 Intervention
No alert or peer comparison
Group II: Peer Comparison ReportActive Control1 Intervention
Clinicians assigned to peer comparison, will receive messages by secure email every two weeks regarding their SGLT2i and MRA prescribing performance.
Group III: AlertActive Control1 Intervention
Clinicians in the alert arm will receive an alert two business days prior to a patient's upcoming appointment. Clinicians will receive approximately two alerts per week.
Group IV: Alert and Peer ComparisonActive Control2 Interventions
The combined alert and peer comparison arm will receive both interventions.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

VA Office of Research and Development

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,691
Recruited
3,759,000+

Arizona State University

Collaborator

Trials
311
Recruited
109,000+

Findings from Research

Dapagliflozin, when added to standard treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), significantly improves patient outcomes, increasing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from 6.33 to 6.92, while the cost of treatment rises from approximately 559 USD to 1745 USD.
The cost-effectiveness analysis shows that dapagliflozin is a cost-effective option for HFrEF patients, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 1991 USD/QALY, and it remains cost-effective for 87% of scenarios at a willingness to pay threshold of 5131 USD/QALY.
Cost-utility analysis of add-on dapagliflozin treatment in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Krittayaphong, R., Permsuwan, U.[2021]
Dapagliflozin is more cost-effective than empagliflozin for preventing cardiovascular death in heart failure patients, with a cost needed to treat (CNT) of $528,770 compared to $1,018,368 for empagliflozin, based on data from major clinical trials.
The annualized number needed to treat (aNNT) to prevent one cardiovascular death was significantly lower for dapagliflozin (110) than for empagliflozin (204), indicating that dapagliflozin may provide better clinical outcomes for the cost in heart failure management.
Effect of Dapagliflozin Versus Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular Death in Patients with Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: Cost per Outcome Analysis.Alnsasra, H., Tsaban, G., Solomon, A., et al.[2023]
Dapagliflozin, when added to usual care for patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, significantly improves quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life expectancy, with increases of 0.231 QALYs and 0.354 life-years in the UK.
The treatment is projected to be cost-effective across the UK, Germany, and Spain, with high probabilities (91% in the UK, 89% in Germany, and 92% in Spain) of being within acceptable cost-effectiveness thresholds, making it a viable option for healthcare systems in these countries.
The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: A European health-economic analysis of the DELIVER trial.Booth, D., Davis, JA., McEwan, P., et al.[2023]

References

Cost-utility analysis of add-on dapagliflozin treatment in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. [2021]
Effect of Dapagliflozin Versus Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular Death in Patients with Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: Cost per Outcome Analysis. [2023]
The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: A European health-economic analysis of the DELIVER trial. [2023]
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Combination with Standard Care versus Standard Care Only in the Treatment of Heart Failure Patients in Finland. [2023]
Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin as a treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a multinational health-economic analysis of DAPA-HF. [2021]
Cost-effectiveness of immediate initiation of dapagliflozin in patients with a history of heart failure. [2023]
Safety and Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Multiple-Treatment Meta-Analysis of Clinical Decision Indicators. [2021]
In chronic HF, empagliflozin reduced a composite of CV death or HF hospitalization across kidney risk categories. [2023]
Drug treatment with empagliflozin lowered risk for hospitalization in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: plain language summary of the EMPEROR-Reduced study. [2023]
Comparing the clinical outcomes across different sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in heart failure patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. [2022]
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors eligibility in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. [2021]