120 Participants Needed

Manipulation and Dry Needling for Cervicogenic Headache

JD
IY
Overseen ByIan Young, DSc, PT
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of this treatment for cervicogenic headache?

Research suggests that combining dry needling with exercises can improve neck pain and headache-related issues in people with cervicogenic headaches. Additionally, dry needling, when added to physical therapy, may enhance long-term outcomes for these headaches.12345

Is dry needling and cervical manipulation safe for treating cervicogenic headaches?

Dry needling and cervical manipulation are generally considered safe, but there are rare cases of serious adverse events with cervical manipulation. Most studies report only minor, temporary side effects.14678

How does the treatment of manipulation and dry needling for cervicogenic headache differ from other treatments?

This treatment is unique because it combines dry needling (using thin needles to target muscle knots) and thrust manipulation (a quick, controlled movement to adjust the spine), which may address both muscle tension and spinal alignment issues, unlike other treatments that might focus on just one aspect.910111213

What is the purpose of this trial?

The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with cervicogenic headaches associated with type II whiplash associated disorder: non-thrust mobilization and exercise versus thrust manipulation and dry needling. Physical therapists commonly use all of these techniques to treat cervicogenic headaches. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.

Research Team

JD

James Dunning, PhD, DPT

Principal Investigator

American Academy of Manipulative Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for individuals with cervicogenic headaches, which are often caused by neck issues and can follow a whiplash injury (WAD II). Participants should have these specific types of headaches to qualify.

Inclusion Criteria

I have had headaches at least once a week since my whiplash injury.
Neck Disability Index score of greater than 10/50 on the NDI
My headaches are more intense than a mild ache.
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have been diagnosed with fibromyalgia.
I have been diagnosed with or am showing signs of a concussion.
Positive screen for cervical radiography (Canadian C-Spine Rules)
See 11 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either dry needling and thrust manipulation or exercise and non-thrust mobilization for cervicogenic headaches and type II whiplash associated disorder

4 weeks
1-2 visits per week (up to 8 sessions total)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in headache intensity, frequency, and other outcomes

3 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Dry Needling
  • Exercise
  • Non-thrust Mobilization
  • Thrust Manipulation
Trial Overview The study compares two treatment methods for cervicogenic headaches: one combines non-thrust mobilization and exercise; the other uses thrust manipulation and dry needling. The goal is to see which strategy works better.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Dry Needling,Thrust ManipulationExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Dry needling to the craniofacial, upper cervical, and cervicothoracic regions. High-velocity thrust manipulation to the upper cervical spine, mid/lower cervical spine, and cervicothoracic spinal regions.
Group II: Exercise,Non-thrust MobilizationActive Control1 Intervention
Nonthrust joint mobilization to the upper cervical spine, mid/lower cervical spine, and cervicothoracic spinal regions. Cranio-cervical flexion exercises, peri-scapular progressive resistance exercises, and electrothermal modalities

Dry Needling is already approved in United Kingdom, United States for the following indications:

🇬🇧
Approved in United Kingdom as Dry Needling for:
  • Knee osteoarthritis pain management
  • Muscle strength improvement
  • Leg function enhancement
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Dry Needling for:
  • Chronic knee pain relief
  • Musculoskeletal pain management
  • Myofascial pain syndrome treatment

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

Lead Sponsor

Trials
15
Recruited
2,200+

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Collaborator

Trials
137
Recruited
10,300+

Findings from Research

In a study involving 7 participants with cervicogenic headache, a combination of dry needling and neuromuscular reeducation exercises led to significant improvements in cervical range of motion and neck pain-related disability over a 4-week treatment period.
The results suggest that this treatment approach could effectively reduce pain and disability in individuals suffering from cervicogenic headaches.
The utilization of dry needling and an upper extremity exercise program for individuals with cervicogenic headaches: A pilot study.Geist, K., Frierson, E., Hudson, O., et al.[2022]
Three studies indicated that dry needling, when added to conventional physiotherapy, resulted in statistically significant improvements in tension-type and cervicogenic headaches, particularly noting a 45 mm reduction in pain intensity on the VAS scale.
While no significant differences were found between groups, and no adverse events were reported, the evidence suggests that dry needling could be a beneficial adjunct to physiotherapy for headache management, warranting further research for stronger conclusions.
Evidence for the use of dry needling and physiotherapy in the management of cervicogenic or tension-type headache: a systematic review.France, S., Bown, J., Nowosilskyj, M., et al.[2022]
Both dry needling and manual pressure release techniques effectively reduced pain intensity and improved cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain, but the effects on muscle performance were limited.
Dry needling significantly increased pressure pain thresholds compared to manual pressure release, suggesting it may offer a more effective option for pain management in this context.
Immediate Effects of Dry Needing or Manual Pressure Release of Upper Trapezius Trigger Points on Muscle Activity During the Craniocervical Flexion Test in People with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Rodríguez-Jiménez, J., Ortega-Santiago, R., Bonilla-Barba, L., et al.[2022]

References

The utilization of dry needling and an upper extremity exercise program for individuals with cervicogenic headaches: A pilot study. [2022]
Evidence for the use of dry needling and physiotherapy in the management of cervicogenic or tension-type headache: a systematic review. [2022]
Immediate Effects of Dry Needing or Manual Pressure Release of Upper Trapezius Trigger Points on Muscle Activity During the Craniocervical Flexion Test in People with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. [2022]
Comparison of acute effects of superficial and deep dry needling into trigger points of suboccipital and upper trapezius muscles in patients with cervicogenic headache. [2018]
The Effect of Adding Dry Needling to Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [2022]
Adverse events associated with the use of cervical manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain in adults: a systematic review. [2022]
Is Dry Needling Effective When Combined with Other Therapies for Myofascial Trigger Points Associated with Neck Pain Symptoms? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [2023]
Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Myofascial Trigger Points Associated with Neck Pain Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [2020]
The methodology and operation of a pilot randomized control trial of the effectiveness of the Bug Busting method against a single application insecticide product for head louse treatment. [2016]
Systematic review of clinical efficacy of topical treatments for head lice. [2019]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Pediculosis capitis: an update. [2012]
Efficacy of the LouseBuster, a new medical device for treating head lice (Anoplura:Pediculidae). [2019]
The effect of larval selection on adult resistance to DDT in two strains of the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L). [2019]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security