40 Participants Needed

Eye-Tracking for Word Learning in Deaf Children

AL
Overseen ByAmy Lieberman, PhD
Age: < 18
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Boston University Charles River Campus
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial examines how deaf children learn words using visual cues, focusing on the concept of mutual exclusivity. It seeks to determine whether deaf children who use American Sign Language (ASL) assume that each object has one sign or both a sign and a spoken word. The study observes how children respond to various visual cues paired with objects. Ideal candidates for this trial are children aged 18-60 months who were born severely to profoundly deaf, use ASL to communicate, and have normal or corrected vision. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to enhance understanding of language development in deaf children.

Do I need to stop my current medications for this trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What prior data suggests that this method is safe for children?

Research has shown that using cues, such as visual and referential cues, is generally safe for children, including those who are deaf or hard of hearing. These cues aid in word learning by providing various signals. Although specific studies on the direct safety of these cues are lacking, no evidence suggests they cause harm. Instead, studies emphasize the importance of exposing deaf children to rich, varied language, including signs, visual information, and other inputs to support language learning. Thus, using these cues is considered safe and beneficial for children learning words.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores a new way to support word learning in deaf children using eye-tracking and referential cues. Traditionally, interventions for deaf children focus on sign language or auditory training. However, this method leverages visual cues by combining gaze direction and novel labels, which could enhance the association between words and objects. This approach may offer a more intuitive learning process for children who primarily rely on visual information, potentially speeding up their language acquisition in a way that other methods do not.

What evidence suggests that this trial's methods could be effective for word learning in deaf children?

This trial will explore the use of visual cues to aid word learning in deaf children. Research has shown that visual cues can help deaf children learn new words. Studies have found that directly teaching words, such as pointing to and naming objects, is more effective than learning by chance for deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Visual cues are crucial because deaf children rely on visual information differently than hearing children when recognizing words. Early results suggest that methods like Cued Speech, which combines speech with hand signals, improve speech understanding in children with cochlear implants. This underscores the importance of clear visual input. Overall, these strategies enhance word learning for deaf children.24678

Who Is on the Research Team?

AL

Amy Lieberman, PhD

Principal Investigator

Boston University

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for deaf children aged 18-60 months who were born with severe to profound hearing loss. It's suitable for those who use American Sign Language (ASL) and have normal or corrected-to-normal vision, regardless of whether their parents are deaf or hearing.

Inclusion Criteria

Children who are deaf and have parents who are either deaf or hearing.
My child, aged 18-60 months, was born with severe to profound deafness.
I am a deaf child with normal or corrected-to-normal vision.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

My child is deaf and has not learned American Sign Language.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Experimental Procedure

Participants engage in structured word learning tasks involving object selection based on referential cues and mutual exclusivity

1 session
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for any additional insights or data collection post-experiment

2 weeks

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • input cue
Trial Overview The study investigates how deaf children learn words using a principle called mutual exclusivity - the idea that each object has only one name. Researchers will see if this applies to kids learning ASL and those learning both ASL and spoken language through eye-tracking and behavior observation.
How Is the Trial Designed?
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Referential cues to objectExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Boston University Charles River Campus

Lead Sponsor

Trials
125
Recruited
14,100+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Hearing children and deaf children who were exposed early and intensively to Cued Speech (CS-Home) demonstrated high accuracy in spelling both high-frequency and low-frequency words, indicating effective phonological representation.
In contrast, deaf children who were exposed to Cued Speech later and only at school (CS-School) showed lower accuracy in spelling, suggesting that early and consistent exposure to phonologically rich environments is crucial for developing strong phonological and orthographic skills.
Phonology acquired through the eyes and spelling in deaf children.Leybaert, J.[2006]
Deaf children with cochlear implants who were exposed to cued speech early (before 2 years old) showed significant improvements in phonemic awareness and reading skills compared to those who were not exposed to cued speech.
Cued speech did not enhance phonological short-term memory, but children exposed to it performed similarly to hearing peers in phonemic awareness and reading tasks, highlighting its effectiveness in supporting literacy development in deaf children.
Reading and reading-related skills in children using cochlear implants: prospects for the influence of cued speech.Bouton, S., Bertoncini, J., Serniclaes, W., et al.[2013]
Deaf children learning American Sign Language (ASL) show efficient lexical recognition similar to hearing children, activating semantic features of signs quickly after they are presented.
While these children recognize the meaning of signs effectively, they are more influenced by phonological competitors in their responses, indicating a complex interaction between semantic understanding and phonological processing in ASL.
Lexical Recognition in Deaf Children Learning American Sign Language: Activation of Semantic and Phonological Features of Signs.Lieberman, AM., Borovsky, A.[2021]

Citations

Flexible fast-mapping: Deaf children dynamically allocate ...This study provides first evidence for fast-mapping in sign language, and contributes to theoretical accounts of how word learning develops when all input ...
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vocabulary ...These results also show that explicit vocabulary instruction is more beneficial for DHH children than incidental learning. Other direct instruction methods can ...
Cued Speech for Enhancing Speech Perception and First ...We describe five lines of research that are converging to support the view that Cued Speech can enhance speech perception in individuals with cochlear implants.
The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in ...Recent research suggests key differences in how deaf and hearing readers use visual information during visual word recognition.
Quality and Quantity of Language Input and Its Relation to the ...This literature review is organized by 4 major sections: 1) the role of social interaction in language acquisition, 2) the language exposure for children with.
Deaf Children Need Rich Language Input from the StartDeaf children need comprehensible multimodal language exposure, including sign language, from birth, and early, accessible language is crucial.
Vocal and Tactile Input to Children Who Are Deaf or Hard ...This study explored the frequency of maternal touch and the temporal alignment of touch with speech in the input to children who are DHH and age-matched peers ...
Impact of Hearing Loss Type on Linguistic Development in ...This study aimed to analyze how different types and degrees of hearing loss impact linguistic development in children, and to identify clinical factors.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of ServiceยทPrivacy PolicyยทCookiesยทSecurity