116 Participants Needed

Therapeutic Hypothermia for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

SM
CS
Overseen ByCurtis S King
Age: 18 - 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Restorear Devices LLC
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The goal of this interventional clinical study is to investigate the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia devices for preservation of sensory structures in the cochlea after noise exposure. The main aims of the study are: 1. To test the safety and best duration for use for a new hypothermia device. 2. To determine if the hypothermia device helps decrease noise-induced hearing loss in a group of firefighters. Participants will wear the mild therapeutic hypothermia therapy devices immediately after a fire service shift serially over a year. Researchers will compare results from those receiving the therapy to those from a control group (individuals receiving no therapy and a sham therapy).

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but if you are currently receiving treatment for tinnitus or other ear conditions, you may not be eligible to participate.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Cold pack-delivered mild therapeutic hypothermia for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss?

Research shows that mild therapeutic hypothermia (cooling the body slightly) has been used to improve outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injuries and after cardiac arrest. This suggests that cooling might help reduce damage in other conditions, like noise-induced hearing loss, by protecting cells from further injury.12345

How is the treatment Cold pack-delivered mild therapeutic hypothermia unique for noise-induced hearing loss?

Cold pack-delivered mild therapeutic hypothermia is unique because it uses cooling to protect hearing by slowing down metabolic processes and reducing oxidative stress, which are different mechanisms compared to other treatments that might focus on drugs or surgery.678910

Research Team

SM

Suhrud M Rajguru, PhD

Principal Investigator

RestorEar Devices

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for firefighters who have been exposed to loud noise during their shifts and are at risk for noise-induced hearing loss. Participants should be willing to wear a hypothermia therapy device after their shifts over a year. Specific eligibility details are not provided, but typically, participants must meet certain health criteria and not have conditions that would exclude them from safely participating.

Inclusion Criteria

* Fluency in English

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Safety Evaluation

Non-firefighter control subjects receive MTH-treatment and normothermia-sham through the device alternated over 8 sessions. Subjective assessments and audiologic testing pre- and post-treatments will be compared.

4 weeks
8 visits (in-person)

Efficacy Evaluation

Firefighters and control groups receive MTH-treatment or sham treatment quarterly. Baseline hearing function is measured prior to initiation, and treatments are repeated quarterly over one year.

52 weeks
Quarterly visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including weekly remote surveys to evaluate device use and noise exposure.

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Cold pack-delivered mild therapeutic hypothermia
Trial Overview The study is testing a non-invasive hypothermia device applied using a cold pack to see if it can protect against hearing loss after noise exposure. Firefighters will use the device after their shifts, and their hearing will be compared to those who didn't receive the therapy or received a sham (fake) therapy.
Participant Groups
4Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Safety ArmExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Non-firefighter control subjects will receive MTH-treatment and normothermia-sham through the device alternated over 8 sessions. Subjective assessments and audiologic testing pre- and post-treatments will be compared between MTH-treatment and sham in each subject. n=24.
Group II: Efficacy Arm 1 - TreatmentExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Firefighters will receive hypothermia treatment delivered with ReBound devices, applied post-work shift. Baseline hearing function will be measured prior to initiation of the treatment. Treatments and functional assessments will be repeated quarterly over one year. Temporary and permanent threshold changes in this chronically noise exposed group of firefighters receiving MTH-treatment will be compared with firefighters receiving sham-treatment and with controls receiving MTH-treatment. Subjects in this group will also be sent home with a device to use after noise exposure during the study period. They will complete weekly, remote surveys collecting data on their noise exposure and device use. n=24.
Group III: Efficacy Arm 2 - Non-TherapeuticActive Control1 Intervention
Firefighters will receive non-therapeutic "treatment" delivered with normothermic ReBound devices, applied post-work shift. Baseline hearing function will be measured prior to initiation of the treatment. Treatments and functional assessments will be repeated quarterly over one year. n=24.
Group IV: Efficacy Arm 3 - ControlActive Control1 Intervention
Age- and sex-matched non-firefighter control group will receive MTH-treatment quarterly over the same duration. Baseline hearing function will be measured prior to initiation of the treatment. Treatments and functional assessments will be repeated quarterly over one year. Subjects in this group will also be sent home with a device to use after noise exposure during the study period. They will complete weekly, remote surveys collecting data on their noise exposure and device use. n=24.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Restorear Devices LLC

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2
Recruited
170+

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

Collaborator

Trials
377
Recruited
190,000+

University of Miami

Collaborator

Trials
976
Recruited
423,000+

Findings from Research

Hypothermia has shown protective effects on the brain after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in animal studies, but clinical results have been inconsistent, possibly due to the complex nature of injuries in humans.
This review highlights the need for more sophisticated experimental models that include secondary injuries like hypotension and hypoxemia to better understand the efficacy of hypothermia in TBI treatment.
Secondary injuries in brain trauma: effects of hypothermia.Fritz, HG., Bauer, R.[2019]
In a post hoc analysis of the B-HYPO study involving 97 patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), slow rewarming after mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) for more than 48 hours was associated with significantly better neurological outcomes in patients with evacuated hematomas, with a 65% good outcome rate compared to 22% for those rewarmed in 48 hours or less.
The study suggests that the method of rewarming may play a critical role in the effectiveness of MTH for improving neurological recovery in TBI patients, highlighting the need for further research to establish optimal rewarming protocols.
Slow rewarming improved the neurological outcomes of prolonged mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and an evacuated hematoma.Kaneko, T., Fujita, M., Yamashita, S., et al.[2019]
The titration method of mild hypothermia therapy was found to be clinically feasible for reducing intracranial pressure in nine severely head-injured patients, with a significant decrease in mean intracranial pressure from 24 to 15 mm Hg after treatment.
Despite the effectiveness in lowering intracranial pressure, the method was associated with systemic complications, including infections and changes in blood markers, indicating a need for careful monitoring during treatment.
Feasibility of the titration method of mild hypothermia in severely head-injured patients with intracranial hypertension.Tateishi, A., Soejima, Y., Taira, Y., et al.[2019]

References

Secondary injuries in brain trauma: effects of hypothermia. [2019]
Slow rewarming improved the neurological outcomes of prolonged mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and an evacuated hematoma. [2019]
Feasibility of the titration method of mild hypothermia in severely head-injured patients with intracranial hypertension. [2019]
Mild therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: What does really matter? [2021]
Pre-hospital mild therapeutic hypothermia for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. [2022]
Local hypothermia in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. [2013]
Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia and Putative Mechanisms of Hair Cell Survival in the Cochlea. [2023]
Achieving Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia in the Human Cochlea. [2023]
Mild therapeutic hypothermia protects against inflammatory and proapoptotic processes in the rat model of cochlear implant trauma. [2023]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Stridor in asphyxiated neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. [2014]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceยทPrivacy PolicyยทCookiesยทSecurity