448 Participants Needed

BCL vs WL Guided Surgery for Breast Cancer

Recruiting at 19 trial locations
GL
DD
JP
Overseen ByJodie Ploetz, MA
Age: 18+
Sex: Female
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: CairnSurgical, Inc.
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized, controlled trial is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Breast Cancer Locator (BCL) in subjects with non-palpable invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Subjects will be randomized to breast conserving surgery (BCS) utilizing either the BCL or wire localization (WL) to guide surgery.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you are receiving or planning to receive chemotherapy, you would not be eligible for this trial.

What data supports the effectiveness of this treatment for breast cancer?

Research shows that wire-guided localization (WL) is a popular and effective technique for breast cancer surgery, helping to minimize the need for additional surgeries and improve cosmetic outcomes. Studies also suggest that using multiple wires (bracketing) can reduce the amount of tissue removed without affecting the success of the surgery.12345

Is BCL or WL guided surgery for breast cancer safe for humans?

The Breast Cancer Locator (BCL) and Wire Localization (WL) techniques have been used in breast-conserving surgeries, and while the studies focus on effectiveness and surgical outcomes, they do not report specific safety concerns, suggesting these methods are generally considered safe for human use.12346

How is the BCL guided partial mastectomy treatment different from other breast cancer treatments?

The BCL guided partial mastectomy is unique because it uses a Breast Cancer Locator (BCL) to guide the surgery, which may improve precision compared to traditional wire localization (WL) methods. This approach aims to reduce the need for re-excision and improve cosmetic outcomes by minimizing the volume of tissue removed.12345

Research Team

JG

Jennifer Gass, MD

Principal Investigator

Women & Infants Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for women over 18 with non-palpable invasive breast cancer or DCIS, visible on MRI, at least 1 cm in size. Candidates must not have severe claustrophobia, metal implants incompatible with MRI, allergies to device materials or gadolinium contrast, and should not be pregnant. The tumor should be unifocal without multicentric tumors more than 2 cm away.

Inclusion Criteria

Ability to voluntarily provide informed consent
My surgeon needs special techniques to locate my tumor because it can't be felt by hand.
The tumor shows up more clearly on a special type of breast MRI scan.
See 6 more

Exclusion Criteria

Before joining the study, women who could get pregnant will need to take a pregnancy test.
I am severely allergic to gadolinium-based contrast.
I need more than 2 wires to locate my tumor if I receive standard treatment.
See 9 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo breast conserving surgery (BCS) using either Breast Cancer Locator (BCL) or Wire Localization (WL) for surgical guidance

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after surgery, including assessment of positive margin rate and re-excision rate

18 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Breast Cancer Locator (BCL) guided partial mastectomy
  • Wire Localized (WL) partial mastectomy
Trial Overview The study compares two methods of guiding surgery for breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Locator (BCL) and traditional Wire Localization (WL). Participants will undergo a partial mastectomy using one of these techniques determined by random assignment.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Breast Cancer Locator (BCL)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Subject randomized to BCL surgical guidance to perform partial mastectomy
Group II: Wire Localization (WL)Active Control1 Intervention
Subject randomized to WL surgical guidance to perform partial mastectomy

Breast Cancer Locator (BCL) guided partial mastectomy is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Breast Cancer Locator for:
  • Non-palpable invasive breast cancer
  • Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Breast Cancer Locator for:
  • Non-palpable invasive breast cancer
  • Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

CairnSurgical, Inc.

Lead Sponsor

Trials
3
Recruited
530+

Findings from Research

In a study of 148 breast cancer patients, the combination of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) and tailored wire-guided localization (WL) resulted in a 13.5% rate of positive margins, indicating effective surgical precision.
The study found that multifocality in tumors significantly increased the likelihood of affected margins (odds ratio 4.67), highlighting the importance of individualized surgical planning to improve outcomes.
Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with tailored needle-guided excision.Hernanz, F., González-Noriega, M., Sánchez, S., et al.[2022]
Bracketing wire-guided localization (BWL) significantly reduces the amount of healthy breast tissue removed during surgery for tumors larger than 1.5 cm compared to conventional wire-guided localization (WGL), while maintaining similar rates of negative margins.
BWL is also a viable alternative to intraoperative ultrasound guidance for poorly defined breast tumors, achieving better resection ratios than ultrasound in certain cases.
Optimization of Wire-guided Technique With Bracketing Reduces Resection Volumes in Breast-conserving Surgery for Early Breast Cancer.Civil, YA., Duvivier, KM., Perin, P., et al.[2021]
Electromagnetic seed localization (ESL) for breast-conserving surgery resulted in significantly smaller specimen volumes compared to wire localization (WL), indicating a more precise removal of tissue (36 cm³ vs. 55 cm³).
While the differences in positive margins and re-excision rates between ESL and WL were not statistically significant, ESL showed a trend towards fewer positive margins (10% vs. 19%) and lower re-excision rates (6% vs. 13%), suggesting it may be a safer option.
The Impact of an Electromagnetic Seed Localization Device Versus Wire Localization on Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Matched-Pair Analysis.Jordan, RM., Rivera-Sanchez, L., Kelley, K., et al.[2023]

References

1.China (Republic : 1949- )pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with tailored needle-guided excision. [2022]
Optimization of Wire-guided Technique With Bracketing Reduces Resection Volumes in Breast-conserving Surgery for Early Breast Cancer. [2021]
The Impact of an Electromagnetic Seed Localization Device Versus Wire Localization on Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Matched-Pair Analysis. [2023]
Rapid Implementation of Intraoperative Ultrasonography to Reduce Wire Localization in The Permanente Medical Group. [2020]
Radioactive seed localization breast biopsy and lumpectomy: can specimen radiographs be eliminated? [2019]
A pilot multi-institutional study to evaluate the accuracy of a supine MRI based guidance system, the Breast Cancer Locator™, in patients with palpable breast cancer. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security