80 Participants Needed

Powered Prosthesis for Amputation

ML
NR
Overseen ByNoah Rubin, BA
Age: 18 - 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: North Carolina State University
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

Lower limb amputees rely on their prosthetic to remain active and lead an independent life. In recent years, measuring residual muscle activity has been used to interpret a user's intent and thereby modulate prosthesis control. However, little knowledge is held on how residual muscle activity differs from non-amputated muscle. The research team will analyze and compare neuromuscular physiology in non-amputee individuals and amputees' non-amputated and residual muscles across functional tasks to better understand how amputees control their muscles. Such information will inform design of modern prosthesis controllers.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment for powered prosthesis for amputation?

Research shows that using a prosthesis (artificial limb) after amputation can help people regain mobility and independence, with many returning to a useful life. Early use of a prosthesis is linked to better movement and fewer complications.12345

Is the powered prosthesis for amputation generally safe for humans?

Research shows that safety is a key focus when testing and using lower limb prostheses. There are protocols to manage risks like falls and injuries, and communication between healthcare teams and patients is important to ensure safety during rehabilitation.678910

How does the powered prosthesis treatment for amputation differ from other treatments?

The powered prosthesis for amputation is unique because it actively mimics the biomechanics of a natural leg, using energy-efficient mechanisms to replicate the functions of the knee, ankle, and toe, unlike traditional passive prostheses that are heavier and less functional. This allows for more natural movement and improved mobility, with the added benefit of a longer battery life and the ability to walk indefinitely on level ground without recharging.1112131415

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for lower limb amputees who use a prosthetic to stay active and independent. It's also for non-amputee individuals as a comparison group. The study aims to understand muscle control in both groups during various tasks.

Inclusion Criteria

Live in the United States
I can walk over curbs, stairs, and uneven surfaces without help.

Exclusion Criteria

Have any cognitive, visual, or balance impairments that affect the ability to provide informed consent or to follow instructions during the experiments
I have had a stroke.
I have heart disease.
See 3 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Muscle Activation While Sitting

Participants practice muscle activation of their ankle muscles while wearing sensors measuring their muscle activity and shape.

3 sessions
3 visits (in-person)

Prosthesis Fitting

Participants undergo socket casting and fitting sessions with a powered prosthesis.

3 sessions
3 visits (in-person)

Functional Tasks

Participants perform functional tasks to practice modulating and controlling muscle activation with both passive and powered prostheses.

10 sessions
10 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after completing the functional tasks.

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Amputation
  • Prosthesis Control
Trial Overview The research focuses on comparing the muscle activity of amputated limbs with that of intact muscles in non-amputees. This will help improve how powered prostheses are controlled based on residual muscle signals.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Individuals With AmputationExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Tasks with a passive prosthesis Tasks with a powered active prosthesis
Group II: Individuals Without AmputationActive Control1 Intervention
No Intervention Tested in identical tasks for comparison to Individuals with Amputation

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

North Carolina State University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
38
Recruited
50,000+

Findings from Research

In a study of 66 adults with amputations, veterans reported significantly lower levels of posttraumatic growth (PTG) compared to civilians, suggesting that veterans may need targeted support for recovery.
Participants who regularly engaged in support groups experienced significantly higher PTG scores, indicating that support group participation can enhance recovery and personal growth after amputation.
Posttraumatic growth in individuals with amputations.Stutts, LA., Stanaland, AW.[2022]
A systematic review identified 64 studies assessing health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients after amputation due to peripheral artery disease (PAD) or diabetes, highlighting the need for better evaluation tools.
Only one amputation-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) was found suitable for all patients post-amputation, indicating a significant gap in well-tested, multidimensional measures that can be used for both prosthetic and wheelchair users.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Major Lower Limb Amputation Caused by Peripheral Artery Disease or Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Miller, R., Ambler, GK., Ramirez, J., et al.[2022]
The newly developed Below Knee Carbon Fibre Shaft Endo-Skeletal (BK ES CF) Prosthesis was provided to 815 amputee patients, with performance feedback collected from 500 of them.
Over 86% of patients reported satisfaction with the prosthesis, indicating it allowed them to achieve an almost normal gait, highlighting its effectiveness in rehabilitation.
Clinical Appraisal of Indigenous Below Knee Endoskeletal Carbon Fibre Prosthesis.Pithawa, AK., Singh, G., Ravindranath, G.[2020]

References

Posttraumatic growth in individuals with amputations. [2022]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Major Lower Limb Amputation Caused by Peripheral Artery Disease or Diabetes: A Systematic Review. [2022]
Clinical Appraisal of Indigenous Below Knee Endoskeletal Carbon Fibre Prosthesis. [2020]
Factors that influence time to prosthesis receipt after lower limb amputation: A Cox proportional hazard model regression. [2023]
A critical review of amputation in vascular patients. [2022]
Design of a stepwise safety protocol for lower limb prosthetic risk management in a clinical investigation. [2022]
Patterns and Causes of Amputation in Ayder Referral Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia: A Three-Year Experience. [2022]
Patient safety in the rehabilitation of the adult with an amputation. [2022]
Recent advances in bioelectric prostheses. [2020]
The Danish Amputation Register 1972-1984. [2022]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Targeted muscle reinnervation and prosthetic rehabilitation after limb loss. [2022]
Active plantar-flexion above-knee prosthesis: concept and preliminary design. [2017]
13.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A lightweight robotic leg prosthesis replicating the biomechanics of the knee, ankle, and toe joint. [2023]
[Prosthetic possibilities after amputations in the upper extremities]. [2022]
The stump and the prosthesis. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceยทPrivacy PolicyยทCookiesยทSecurity