MicroDerm for Gum Recession

No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests two treatments, Alloderm and MicroDerm (a type of tissue graft), to determine which is more effective for gum recession. It evaluates how well each treatment heals wounds, covers exposed roots, improves gum coverage, boosts blood flow, and enhances patient comfort. Individuals with gum recession who need a tissue graft may qualify, provided they do not smoke, have diabetes, use certain medications, or have poor oral hygiene. As a Phase 4 trial, this research involves treatments already FDA-approved and proven effective, aiming to understand how they benefit more patients.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

If you are taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications, you will need to stop taking them to participate in this trial. The protocol does not specify about other medications, so it's best to discuss with the trial team.

What is the safety track record for Alloderm and MicroDerm?

Research has shown that MicroDerm, or microsurfaced Acellular Dermal Matrix (mADM), is generally well-tolerated. Studies suggest it may effectively treat gum recession by thickening gums and covering exposed roots.

Alloderm, another treatment in this study, is also commonly used in similar gum procedures and has shown success with few reported side effects. As this trial is in Phase 4, both treatments have already been tested on many people, indicating a strong safety record. Overall, both MicroDerm and Alloderm appear to be safe options for treating gum issues.12345

Why are researchers enthusiastic about this study treatment?

MicroDerm is unique because it uses a specially engineered material as a soft tissue graft for treating gum recession. Unlike traditional treatments like AlloDerm, which is derived from donated human tissue, MicroDerm offers a synthetic alternative that may reduce the risk of immune rejection and improve healing times. Researchers are excited because MicroDerm could provide a more consistent and potentially safer option for patients, making gum recession treatment more accessible and effective.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for gum recession?

In this trial, participants will receive either MicroDerm or Alloderm as a soft tissue grafting material for gum recession. Research has shown that MicroDerm, a special material used in dental procedures, can significantly aid receding gums. Specifically, studies found that patients using MicroDerm experienced a reduction in gum recession from an average of 3.64 mm to 0.73 mm over a year, resulting in more tooth root coverage. Alloderm, a commonly used material for gum treatments, is already effective in dental procedures. Both treatments have improved gum coverage, but recent findings suggest that MicroDerm might offer even better results.23678

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 18 who need a tissue graft due to gum recession. It's not for those with previous soft tissue grafts, pregnant or breastfeeding women, smokers, diabetics (HbA1c > 5.6%), people with poor oral hygiene (PII >2), history of certain cancer treatments or bisphosphonate therapy, and those on blood thinners or allergic to study medications.

Inclusion Criteria

I am over 18 and need a tissue graft for my receding gums.

Exclusion Criteria

I have had surgery involving a soft tissue graft.
Pregnant or lactating women
Current smokers or users of nicotine replacement products
See 5 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either microsurfaced Acellular Dermal Matrix (mADM) or Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) for root coverage procedures

1-2 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for wound healing, root coverage, gum tissue coverage, blood flow, and patient comfort

up to 1 year
Multiple visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Alloderm
  • MicroDerm
Trial Overview The study compares two types of dermal matrices used in dental surgery: standard Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and microsurfaced ADM (mADM). The focus is on how well they heal wounds, cover roots and gums after surgery, improve blood flow to the area, and patient comfort during recovery.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: mADMExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: ADMActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Ohio State University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
891
Recruited
2,659,000+

Citations

Root coverage using a microsurfaced acellular dermal matrix: A ...Eleven RT1 gingival recession defects from five patients were treated using mADM between January and May 2023 by a single surgeon (S.R.). A modified vestibular ...
Root coverage using a microsurfaced acellular dermal matrixPair t‐tests were utilized to compare changes overtime. Results The mean recession depth reduced from 3.64 ± 0.50 mm to 0.73 ± 0.79 mm after 12 months.
3.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38660934/
Micro-needling versus acellular dermal matrix in RT1 ...Results: Both groups independently demonstrated significant gain in GT, RW, RD, CAL, PD, Rec-Red, CRC and percentage of root coverage, with ...
Root coverage using a microsurfaced acellular dermal matrixThe purpose of this report is to describe the usage of. mADM in the treatment of gingival recession for root cov- erage in five cases with ...
Clinical Innovation in Periodontics: Promising Results for ...A new case series published in Clinical Advances in Periodontics evaluated the use of microsurfaced acellular dermal matrix (mADM) for treating RT1 gingival ...
Micro‐needling versus acellular dermal matrix in RT1 ...Recession coverage procedures yield more predictable long-term results when accompanied by an increased gingival thickness and keratinized ...
MicroDerm for Gum RecessionThis Phase 4 medical study run by Ohio State University is evaluating whether Alloderm and MicroDerm will have tolerable side effects & efficacy for ...
(PDF) Micro-needling versus acellular dermal matrix in ...Micro-needling versus acellular dermal matrix in RT1 gingival recession coverage: A randomized clinical trial. April 2024; Journal of ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security