95 Participants Needed

Non-TBI Conditioning for HCT in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Recruiting at 24 trial locations
LG
Overseen ByLiz Gourdine
Age: < 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: Pediatric Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Consortium
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial investigates a new method for preparing patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) for a hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) without total body irradiation (TBI). The aim is to determine if this non-TBI approach, known as myeloablative allogeneic HCT with a non-TBI conditioning regimen, is effective for patients at low risk of leukemia relapse. A special test checks for minimal residual disease (tiny amounts of cancer cells) to assess this risk. If the test detects no residual disease, patients may receive the non-TBI treatment before their transplant. This trial suits patients with ALL who are preparing for an HCT and have no detectable cancer cells in their bone marrow, as confirmed by the test. As a Phase 2 trial, the research focuses on evaluating the treatment's effectiveness in an initial, smaller group of participants.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor to get specific guidance based on your situation.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this treatment is likely to be safe for humans?

Research shows that the treatment plan used in this trial, which includes thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine, is generally safe and well-tolerated. Previous studies found that this combination has acceptable side effects for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). These studies suggest that the treatment is promising, with manageable side effects.

Additionally, this treatment approach has been successfully used in various transplant situations, making it a reliable choice for patients undergoing blood cell transplants. While side effects can occur, this drug combination is considered a safe alternative to total body irradiation (TBI), especially for patients with a lower risk of disease recurrence.12345

Why do researchers think this study treatment might be promising for acute lymphoblastic leukemia?

Researchers are excited about this treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia because it uses a myeloablative conditioning regimen without total body irradiation (TBI), which is the traditional approach. The study focuses on using a combination of busulfan, fludarabine, and thiotepa, offering a potentially less toxic alternative to TBI that could reduce long-term side effects. This approach is particularly promising as it could allow more patients to undergo transplantation by minimizing the harmful impact on non-cancerous cells, making the treatment more tolerable and safer.

What evidence suggests that this non-TBI conditioning regimen could be an effective treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia?

This trial will compare two approaches for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing stem cell transplant. One arm involves an observational approach using the NGS-MRD test to determine eligibility for the treatment arm. Studies have shown that a combination of drugs—thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine—can serve as an alternative to total body irradiation (TBI) for patients needing a stem cell transplant. Research suggests that TBI is often more effective for young patients with ALL. However, the treatment arm in this trial will use a myeloablative non-TBI conditioning regimen with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine for eligible patients who have no detectable cancer cells before the transplant. While researchers continue to study the effectiveness of this non-TBI method, it provides another option for those who cannot undergo TBI. Results can vary, and further research is needed to confirm its benefits for this specific group.56789

Who Is on the Research Team?

AH

Abdel-Azim Hisham, MD

Principal Investigator

Loma Linda University

TQ

Troy Quigg, DO, MS

Principal Investigator

Helen DeVos Children's Hospital

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for children, adolescents, and young adults aged 1-25 with B-ALL leukemia who are candidates for a stem cell transplant. They must have low relapse risk indicated by negative NGS-MRD (a type of genetic test) in their bone marrow before the transplant. Participants need to be in first or second remission and have good organ function. Those with certain conditions like CNS relapse history or HIV are not eligible.

Inclusion Criteria

My family or doctor decided against a specific treatment even though tests showed I might benefit from it.
I am receiving my first bone marrow transplant for T-ALL or MPAL.
I have ALL and am undergoing a specific bone marrow transplant.
See 8 more

Exclusion Criteria

I haven't had any cancer, except for skin cancer, in the last 5 years.
I have not had a CNS relapse while in my second complete remission.
I received inotuzumab treatment before my stem cell transplant.
See 9 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

4 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants receive a myeloablative non-TBI conditioning regimen with busulfan, fludarabine, and thiotepa prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation

Variable, based on conditioning regimen

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with NGS-MRD testing at specified intervals

1 year
Multiple visits for NGS-MRD testing at days 42, 100, 180, 270, and 365 post-HCT

Long-term follow-up

Participants are followed for outcome for up to 5 years to estimate event-free survival

5 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Myeloablative allogeneic HCT with a non-TBI conditioning regimen
  • NGS-MRD
Trial Overview The study tests if a non-TBI (no total body irradiation) conditioning regimen before hematopoietic cell transplantation can work for patients with B-ALL who show no minimal residual disease through next-generation sequencing. It compares this approach against standard treatments that include TBI.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Treatment ArmExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group II: Observational ArmExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

Myeloablative allogeneic HCT with a non-TBI conditioning regimen is already approved in United States, European Union for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Myeloablative allogeneic HCT with non-TBI conditioning for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Myeloablative allogeneic HCT with non-TBI conditioning for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Pediatric Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Consortium

Lead Sponsor

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Lead Sponsor

Trials
257
Recruited
5,075,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

A non-myeloablative conditioning regimen using fludarabine, cytarabine, and melphalan (FLAG combined with L-PAM) was successfully administered to 10 pediatric patients with acute leukemia, resulting in 100% engraftment and 80% overall survival after a median follow-up of 126 months.
This approach minimized late adverse effects typically associated with conventional myeloablative treatments like busulfan and total body irradiation, with no treatment-related mortality reported, indicating a safer alternative for children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and melphalan (FALG with L-PAM) as a reduced toxicity conditioning regimen in children with acute leukemia.Kato, K., Yoshida, N., Matsumoto, K., et al.[2014]
Nonmyeloablative regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) resulted in significantly lower regimen-related toxicities and nonrelapse mortality compared to myeloablative regimens, with 3% NRM at day 100 for nonmyeloablative patients versus 23% for myeloablative patients.
Despite nonmyeloablative patients being at higher risk due to factors like age and comorbidities, they experienced less severe toxicities across multiple organ systems, suggesting that these regimens are safer and could be beneficial for patients who are ineligible for more intensive treatments.
Morbidity and mortality with nonmyeloablative compared with myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-matched related donors.Diaconescu, R., Flowers, CR., Storer, B., et al.[2021]
In a study of 278 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing radiation-free myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, outcomes such as overall survival and disease-free survival were similar for patients with and without central nervous system (CNS) involvement.
Pre-HSCT cranial radiation therapy did not significantly reduce the risk of post-transplant CNS relapse, indicating that TBI-free conditioning can be a viable option for ALL patients with CNS involvement, without compromising long-term outcomes.
Radiation-Free myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A comparison of outcomes between patients with and without central nervous system involvement.Esfandbod, M., Enshaei, M., Monzavi, SM., et al.[2022]

Citations

Myeloablative conditioning with thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine ...Myeloablative conditioning with thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine does not improve the outcome of patients transplanted with active leukemia.
Thiotepa-Based Regimens Are Valid Alternatives to Total ...Total body irradiation (TBI) at myeloablative doses is superior to chemotherapy-based regimens in young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) ...
Intravenous Busulfan Compared with Total Body Irradiation ...Thus, we compared the outcomes of adult patients with ALL who received allogeneic HCT after treatment with myeloablative TBI-based conditioning versus i.v. Bu- ...
Total body irradiation versus busulfan based intermediate ...Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative treatment in high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Single Arm Phase II Study of Myeloablative Allogeneic ...We will investigate the safety and efficacy of a myeloablative regimen of Flu TBI 12 Gy regimen for ALL patients who are not eligible for Cy TBI ...
6.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36224494/
Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine conditioning-regimen is ...Our study results do suggest that using TBF as the conditioning regimen in adult ALL patients is a promising option with acceptable toxicity.
Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Fludarabine Conditioning ...Thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine conditioning is safe in a haploidentical transplantation setting. •. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) prophylaxis seems ...
Intravenous Busulfan Compared with Total Body Irradiation ...An updated analysis of MD Anderson data with Bu-Clo transplant conditioning for ALL patients in CR1 (n = 62) or CR2 (n = 28) revealed 2-year overall survival ( ...
Comparing transplant outcomes in ALL patients after ...Our data suggests that FLU-package for alternative donors offers comparable outcomes to ETOP-package for matched donor HCT to treat ALL.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security