16 Participants Needed

UCB Transplant After Non-Myeloablative Prep for Blood Cancers

TK
Overseen ByTimothy Krepski
Age: Any Age
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This is a phase II trial using a non-myeloablative cyclophosphamide/ fludarabine/total body irradiation (TBI) preparative regimen with modifications based on factors including diagnosis, disease status, and prior treatment. Single or double unit selected according to current University of Minnesota umbilical cord blood graft selection algorithm.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug Cyclophosphamide in the treatment of blood cancers?

The research articles provided focus on the use of Cyclophosphamide in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), not blood cancers. However, Cyclophosphamide is a well-known chemotherapy drug often used in various cancer treatments, including blood cancers, due to its ability to kill rapidly dividing cells.12345

How is the UCB transplant treatment with Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine, and TBI different from other treatments for blood cancers?

This treatment is unique because it uses a non-myeloablative (less intense) approach, which means it is less harsh on the body compared to traditional myeloablative regimens, potentially reducing side effects while still preparing the body for a cord blood transplant.678910

Research Team

Margaret MacMillan | Masonic Cancer Center

Margaret MacMillan, MD

Principal Investigator

University of Minnesota

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for people under 75 with certain blood cancers or bone marrow diseases who don't have a fully matched sibling donor. They must be in good enough health, agree to birth control if they can have children, and give written consent. It's not for pregnant women, those breastfeeding, or patients with specific progressing lymphomas or recent transplants.

Inclusion Criteria

I am physically active and can care for myself.
I am under 70 without a matching sibling donor or between 70 and 75 with low health issues.
My lymphoma is considered bulky.
See 7 more

Exclusion Criteria

My condition is chronic myeloid leukemia in its most advanced stage.
Your tests show that your disease is getting worse.
I have an active brain or spinal cord tumor.
See 5 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Preparative Regimen

Participants receive a non-myeloablative preparative regimen including cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and total body irradiation (TBI) with modifications based on diagnosis, disease status, and prior treatment

2 weeks

Transplantation

Umbilical cord blood transplantation is performed using single or double unit selected according to the University of Minnesota umbilical cord blood graft selection algorithm

1 week

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness, including assessment of acute GVHD and chimerism

1 year

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Fludarabine
  • Sirolimus
  • TBI
Trial OverviewThe study tests a non-myeloablative transplant prep using drugs like cyclophosphamide and fludarabine along with total body irradiation (TBI). Patients will receive umbilical cord blood cells selected by the University of Minnesota's guidelines. The aim is to treat advanced hematologic malignancies.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: No ATGExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Hematologic malignancy patients who have received a previous autologous transplant or β‰₯ 2 cycles of multi-agent chemotherapy within the 3 months previous to umbilical cord blood transplantation.
Group II: ATGExperimental Treatment7 Interventions
Hematologic malignancy patients who have not been treated with prior autologous transplant or ≀ 1 cycle of chemotherapy in the 3 months previous to umbilical cord blood transplantation, should receive Anti-thymocyte Globulin (ATG) as part of their conditioning regimen.

Cyclophosphamide is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Approved in United States as Cytoxan for:
  • Breast cancer
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Leukemia
  • Lymphoma
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
Approved in European Union as Endoxan for:
  • Breast cancer
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Leukemia
  • Lymphoma
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Approved in Canada as Neosar for:
  • Breast cancer
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Leukemia
  • Lymphoma
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Approved in Japan as Endoxan for:
  • Breast cancer
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Leukemia
  • Lymphoma

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Lead Sponsor

Trials
285
Recruited
15,700+

Findings from Research

Blisibimod is a highly potent inhibitor of B cell activating factor (BAFF) and is currently being evaluated for its efficacy and safety in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in clinical trials, including the ongoing phase 3 CHABLIS-SC1 trial.
The unique tetravalent 'peptibody' structure of blisibimod may enhance its effectiveness, and its targeted approach towards specific 'responder populations' suggests it could become a significant treatment option for both SLE and IgA nephropathy.
Blisibimod for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: with trials you become wiser.Scheinberg, MA., Hislop, CM., Martin, RS.[2018]
In a Phase 2b clinical trial involving 547 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the highest dose of blisibimod (200 mg once-weekly) showed statistically significant improvements in disease response rates compared to placebo, particularly in patients with severe disease.
Blisibimod was found to be safe, with no significant differences in serious adverse events or infections compared to placebo, indicating it could be a viable treatment option for SLE.
A phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial of blisibimod, an inhibitor of B cell activating factor, in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus, the PEARL-SC study.Furie, RA., Leon, G., Thomas, M., et al.[2022]
In a study of 2910 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing transplants, the thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) conditioning regimen showed significantly lower relapse rates compared to the busulfan-fludarabine (BF) regimen, but it also resulted in higher non-relapse mortality (NRM).
Despite the stronger anti-leukemic activity of TBF-MAC, overall survival and leukemia-free survival rates were similar to those of BF-MAC, indicating that while TBF may reduce relapse, it does not necessarily improve long-term survival outcomes.
Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine compared to busulfan-fludarabine for sibling and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.Saraceni, F., Labopin, M., Hamladji, RM., et al.[2022]

References

Long-term effects of combined B-cell immunomodulation with rituximab and belimumab in severe, refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: 2-year results. [2021]
Efficacy and safety of belimumab/low-dose cyclophosphamide therapy in moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus. [2022]
Comparison of safety, efficacy and cost between oral pulse cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in severe systemic lupus erythematosus. [2021]
Blisibimod for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: with trials you become wiser. [2018]
A phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial of blisibimod, an inhibitor of B cell activating factor, in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus, the PEARL-SC study. [2022]
Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine compared to busulfan-fludarabine for sibling and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. [2022]
Fludarabine-based preparative protocol for unrelated donor cord blood transplantation in children: successful engraftment with minimal toxicity. [2013]
[A comparison of toxicity and efficacy between busulfan plus fludarabine and busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia]. [2014]
The development of a myeloablative, reduced-toxicity, conditioning regimen for cord blood transplantation. [2021]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Myeloablative intravenous busulfan/fludarabine conditioning does not facilitate reliable engraftment of dual umbilical cord blood grafts in adult recipients. [2021]