350 Participants Needed

Trophic Feeding for Sepsis Prevention

(LET-FEED Trial)

Recruiting at 5 trial locations
GC
AS
Overseen ByAriel Salas, MD, MSPH
Age: < 18
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: University of Washington
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether participants must stop taking their current medications. It focuses on feeding regimens for preterm infants, so it's best to consult with the trial coordinators for specific guidance.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Extended Trophic Feeds, Limited Trophic Feeds for sepsis prevention?

Some studies suggest that starting nutritional support early in critically ill patients, like those with sepsis, may help reduce infections such as pneumonia. Additionally, certain nutrients in these feeds, like arginine and glutamine, have been shown to decrease infections in surgical patients, which might be beneficial for sepsis prevention.12345

Is trophic feeding generally safe for humans?

Trophic feeding, which involves providing small amounts of nutrition, is generally considered safe for critically ill patients, including those with sepsis. It is often recommended to use the enteral route (feeding through the gut) whenever possible, as it is assumed to be beneficial and safe based on studies in other critically ill patients.36789

How does the treatment of trophic feeding for sepsis prevention differ from other treatments?

Trophic feeding for sepsis prevention is unique because it involves providing small amounts of nutrition to stimulate the gut without overwhelming it, which may help maintain gut integrity and prevent infections. This approach is different from standard treatments that often focus on antibiotics and supportive care, as it aims to prevent sepsis by supporting the body's natural defenses through nutrition.1011121314

What is the purpose of this trial?

Study Hypothesis/Question In infants born very preterm, advancing enteral feeds after 24 hours from birth (limited trophic feeds) versus after 72 hours (extended trophic feeds) reduces the risk of all-cause late onset sepsis (LOS) without increasing the risk of other adverse outcomes.Study Design Type This is a multi-center, open-label, parallel-group, individual randomized controlled trial comparing two different trophic feeding regimens in preterm infants born between 25w0d and 31w6d. These infants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group, receiving limited trophic feeding (20 to 25 mL/kg/day for one day) or the control group, receiving extended trophic feeding (20 to 25 mL/kg/day for three days) prior to advancing enteral feeds until full feeding volume (140 mL/kg/day) is achieved.Eligibility Criteria Preterm infants with gestational ages between 25 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks and a birthweight of \<1500 grams who are admitted to six participating neonatal units will be eligible for inclusion. Infants with \<5th percentile for weight at birth, vasopressor use within first 24 hours of life major congenital/genetic anomalies affecting enteral feeding, growth, or mortality, and those with a terminal illness in which decisions to withhold or limit support have been made will be excluded. Infants of parents or legal guardians who are unable to provide consent within 36 hours of birth will also be excluded.Study Intervention/Methods Written parental informed consent will be obtained prenatally or within the first 36 hours of birth. Infants will be randomized to receive limited trophic feeds of 24 to 36 hours or extended trophic feeds for 72 hours prior to the advancement of enteral feeds. Infants will be fed parent's own milk (POM) with donor human milk as the alternative if POM is unavailable.Primary Outcome Late-onset sepsis, defined as positive blood, urine, and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures in the presence of compatible clinical signs of sepsis, occurring after postnatal day 3 and before hospital discharge, and treated with antibiotics for 5 days or more.Secondary Outcome(s) The trial will assess various secondary outcomes including length of hospital stay, all-cause in-hospital mortality, duration of IV fluids and central line utilization, necrotizing enterocolitis (Bell's stage IIa or higher), severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III or IV either unilaterally or bilaterally), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (oxygen requirement or positive pressure ventilation at 36 weeks corrected gestational age), or retinopathy of prematurity requiring intervention. Additionally, growth metrics throughout hospitalization will be evaluated using change in weight, length, and head circumference z-scores from birth to 36 weeks' corrected gestational age between infants in the limited and extended trophic feeding groups.

Research Team

GC

Gregory C Valentine

Principal Investigator

University of Washington

Eligibility Criteria

The LET-FEED trial is for very preterm infants born between 25 and almost 32 weeks, weighing less than 1500 grams. It's not for those with severe congenital issues affecting feeding or growth, extremely low birth weight, early vasopressor need, or terminal illness where life support is limited.

Inclusion Criteria

My birth weight was less than 1500 grams.
I was born between 25 and 31 weeks of pregnancy.
Consent to feed donor milk when parent's own milk is not available or of insufficient quantity

Exclusion Criteria

My baby needed medicine to raise blood pressure within 24 hours of birth.
Parent or legal guardian unable to provide consent within 36 hours after birth
I have a birth defect that affects how I am fed.
See 3 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 days

Treatment

Infants receive either limited trophic feeds for 24-36 hours or extended trophic feeds for 72-84 hours before advancing to full enteral feeds

2 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including monitoring for late-onset sepsis and other secondary outcomes

Until hospital discharge, average of 40 weeks' gestation

Long-term Follow-up

Monitoring of growth metrics and other health outcomes until 36 weeks corrected gestational age

From birth to 36 weeks corrected gestational age

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Extended Trophic Feeds
  • Limited Trophic Feeds
Trial Overview This study tests if starting regular feeds after one day (limited trophic feeds) versus three days (extended trophic feeds) affects the risk of late-onset sepsis in very preterm infants without increasing other risks. Infants will be randomly assigned to either group.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Limited Trophic FeedsExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Advancing enteral feeds after 1 day of trophic feeds of 20-25 mL/kg birthweight/day. Advancement of enteral feeds will be by approximately 30 mL/kg birthweight/day until achieving at least 140 mL/kg birthweight/day of enteral feeds. Enteral feeds will consist of parent's own milk or donor human milk.
Group II: Extended Trophic FeedingActive Control1 Intervention
Advancing enteral feeds after 3 days of trophic feeds of 20-25 mL/kg birthweight/day. Advancement of enteral feeds will be by approximately 30 mL/kg birthweight/day after 3 days of trophic feeds. Advancement will occur until achieving at least 140 mL/kg birthweight/day of enteral feeds. Enteral feeds will consist of parent's own milk or donor human milk.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Washington

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,858
Recruited
2,023,000+

University of Oklahoma

Collaborator

Trials
484
Recruited
95,900+

Baylor College of Medicine

Collaborator

Trials
1,044
Recruited
6,031,000+

University of South Florida

Collaborator

Trials
433
Recruited
198,000+

St. Joseph's Medical Center

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
350+

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Collaborator

Trials
1,677
Recruited
2,458,000+

References

[Effect of enteral nutritional support on clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis]. [2023]
Nutrition and sepsis. [2019]
[Nutritional support in sepsis]. [2013]
Enteral nutrition in sepsis patients. [2020]
Substrate composition and sepsis. Effects on immunity. [2019]
Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. [2020]
Gut Microbiome in Sepsis. [2023]
[Impact of intravenous nutrition on plasma free amino acid spectrum and immune function for patients with sepsis]. [2022]
When a calorie isn't just a calorie: a revised look at nutrition in critically ill patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury. [2023]
Examining the efficacy of intravenous administration of predatory bacteria in rats. [2018]
Predation, competition, and nutrient recycling: a stoichiometric approach with multiple nutrients. [2008]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Functional Significance of Bacterial Predators. [2021]
13.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Predatory Bacteria Attenuate Klebsiella pneumoniae Burden in Rat Lungs. [2022]
14.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The influence of dietary and whole-body nutrient content on the excretion of a vertebrate consumer. [2018]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security