80 Participants Needed

Spine Radiosurgery for Cancer

AJ
Overseen ByAmol J. Ghia, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial
Approved in 3 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The goal of this clinical research study is to learn whether delivering spine radiosurgery in a single large dose is better than delivering spine radiosurgery over 3 smaller doses. Researchers also want to learn about the effects of a single dose on participant's symptoms, pain, and quality-of-life.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Spine Radiosurgery for Cancer?

Research shows that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are effective treatments for spinal metastases, which are cancerous growths that spread to the spine. These treatments have been shown to work well in different situations, including as a first treatment, after surgery, and even for tumors that are usually hard to treat with radiation.12345

Is spine radiosurgery safe for humans?

Spine radiosurgery, also known as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is generally considered safe for treating spinal tumors, with complications being rare. The risk of myelopathy (spinal cord damage) is estimated to be very low, affecting only about 0.4% of patients.46789

How is spine radiosurgery different from other treatments for spinal metastases?

Spine radiosurgery (also known as stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT) is unique because it delivers high-dose radiation precisely to spinal tumors, allowing for effective tumor and pain control while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. This advanced technique is particularly beneficial for treating tumors near the spinal cord, where conventional radiotherapy may not be feasible due to the risk of damaging the spinal cord.410111213

Research Team

Amol J. Ghia | MD Anderson Cancer Center

Amol J. Ghia

Principal Investigator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults with solid tumor cancers that have spread to the spine and were previously treated with radiation. They must be able to lie flat, have a life expectancy over 6 months, and agree to use contraception. Excluded are pregnant women, those who can't undergo MRI, or had high-dose spinal radiation within 6 months.

Inclusion Criteria

I have had surgery or laser treatment before.
I am eligible regardless of my gender, race, or ethnicity.
Life expectancy must be greater than 6 months
See 9 more

Exclusion Criteria

I've had radiation at a specific site that exceeded safe levels for nerve tissue.
I cannot lie flat comfortably for 2 hours.
My cancer is either lymphoma or myeloma.
See 3 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Radiosurgery

Participants receive spine radiosurgery in either 1 large dose or 3 smaller doses

1-2 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

24 months
Visits at Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and every 6 months thereafter

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Spine Radiosurgery
Trial Overview The study compares two methods of delivering spine radiosurgery for cancer that has spread to the spine: one single large dose versus three smaller doses. It aims to determine which method is more effective at managing symptoms and improving quality of life.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Spine Radiosurgery - 1 DoseExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Participants receive spine radiosurgery in a single large dose.
Group II: Spine Radiosurgery - 3 DosesActive Control2 Interventions
Participants receive spine radiosurgery over 3 smaller doses.

Spine Radiosurgery is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
Approved in European Union as Spine SBRT for:
  • Vertebral metastases
  • Spinal tumors
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Approved in United States as Spine SBRT for:
  • Vertebral metastases
  • Spinal tumors
  • Painful vertebral metastases
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Approved in Canada as Spine SBRT for:
  • Vertebral metastases
  • Spinal tumors

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
3,107
Recruited
1,813,000+

Findings from Research

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for spinal metastases, allowing for the delivery of high doses of radiation to improve tumor control and provide relief from symptoms.
SBRT is particularly beneficial for patients with complex cases, such as those who have previously received radiation at the same site or have tumors that are resistant to conventional treatments, and can be used alongside other therapies like spinal decompression.
Stereotactic radiotherapy: an emerging treatment for spinal metastases.Dahele, M., Fehlings, MG., Sahgal, A.[2019]
A study involving 10 common scenarios in spinal radiosurgery led to the development of consensus guidelines for target volume definitions, which are crucial for effective treatment of spinal metastases.
The guidelines recommend including abnormal marrow signals in the clinical target volume (CTV) to account for potential microscopic tumor spread, while advising against unnecessary expansions in the absence of epidural disease.
International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium consensus guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery.Cox, BW., Spratt, DE., Lovelock, M., et al.[2022]
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) demonstrated high local control rates for spinal metastasis, with 83% at 1 year and 71% at 2 years, and a median overall survival of 30.6 months among 26 patients with 32 lesions.
The treatment was found to be safe, with only 16% of patients experiencing acute pain flare, which was manageable, and no cases of radiation-induced myelopathy reported.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy as a primary treatment for spinal metastasis: a single institution experience.Yeung, WME.[2021]

References

Stereotactic radiotherapy: an emerging treatment for spinal metastases. [2019]
International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium consensus guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. [2022]
Stereotactic body radiotherapy as a primary treatment for spinal metastasis: a single institution experience. [2021]
Stereotactic body radiation for the spine: a review. [2013]
Stereotactic spine radiosurgery: Review of safety and efficacy with respect to dose and fractionation. [2022]
Failure mode and effect analysis for linear accelerator-based paraspinal stereotactic body radiotherapy. [2021]
Quality and Safety Considerations in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO Safety White Paper Update. [2022]
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Spine Malignancy: A Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines. [2022]
Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal neoplasms: current status and future perspective. [2017]
The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in the re-irradiation of metastatic spinal tumors. [2014]
Spine radiosurgery for spinal metastases: indications, technique and outcome. [2014]
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Spinal Bone Metastasis. [2019]
Stereotactic body radiotherapy: a new paradigm in the management of spinal metastases. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceΒ·Privacy PolicyΒ·CookiesΒ·Security