Accelerated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer

(PRART Trial)

Not currently recruiting at 2 trial locations
SC
PY
CE
SC
Overseen BySharanya Chandrasekhar
Age: 18+
Sex: Female
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial
Approved in 3 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial explores whether a shorter, three-week course of radiation therapy matches the effectiveness of standard treatment for certain types of early-stage breast cancer. It specifically compares two radiation schedules for patients who have undergone surgery for stage 0 or stage T1-T2 breast cancer without lymph node involvement. The goal is to determine if the shorter treatment is equally safe and effective, potentially reducing treatment time for patients. Women who have had a lumpectomy, with negative margins (no cancer cells at the tissue edge), are suitable candidates for this study. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, allowing participants to contribute to a potentially groundbreaking treatment.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that a three-week radiation therapy is generally safe and well-tolerated. One study found that this shorter schedule is effective and safe for patients. Another study demonstrated that it is as effective as a longer, five-week treatment, indicating that most patients can manage the treatment.

In both parts of the study—whether receiving 10 or 15 sessions—earlier research indicates that shorter radiation treatments are often easier for patients to tolerate and can cause fewer side effects than longer treatments. While some patients might experience mild side effects, these are usually not severe.

Overall, these findings suggest that the treatments tested in this trial are likely safe, based on previous research.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores an accelerated radiation therapy approach for breast cancer, which could significantly reduce treatment time. Traditional radiation therapy often lasts several weeks, but this method compresses treatment into just three weeks by delivering higher doses of radiation in fewer fractions. ARM 1 and ARM 2 of the trial deliver whole breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to the tumor bed in 15 and 10 fractions, respectively. This could mean fewer trips to the hospital and a quicker return to normal life for patients, all while maintaining treatment effectiveness.

What evidence suggests that this trial's radiation therapy treatments could be effective for breast cancer?

Research has shown that a 3-week schedule of whole-breast radiation therapy is as effective as the traditional 5-week schedule. Studies have found that the likelihood of cancer recurrence in the breast is similar for both the 3-week and longer treatments, making the shorter option suitable for many patients. In this trial, participants will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive 15 treatment sessions (ARM 1), while the other will receive 10 sessions (ARM 2). Evidence supports that these shorter, more intense treatments are safe and do not increase the risk of side effects. This makes the shorter treatment potentially more convenient without losing effectiveness.13567

Who Is on the Research Team?

SF

Silvia Formenti, M.D.

Principal Investigator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for women who've had a specific breast surgery for early-stage cancer (Stage 0, T1-T2) with no cancer left at the edges of removed tissue and no spread to lymph nodes. It's not open to men, those treated within 60 days after chemotherapy or 90 days post-surgery if they received chemo, or anyone previously radiated on the same breast.

Inclusion Criteria

I have had a segment of my breast surgically removed.
My breast cancer was removed with clear margins.
My breast cancer is contained and hasn't spread beyond its original site.
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

It has been over 60 days since my last chemotherapy session.
It's been over 90 days since my last surgery, or I've had chemotherapy after surgery.
I am a male diagnosed with breast cancer.
See 1 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive whole breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to the tumor bed over 15 fractions (Arm 1) or 10 fractions (Arm 2)

2-3 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

5 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Radiation therapy - 2 weeks
  • Radiation therapy - 3 weeks
Trial Overview The study compares two schedules of radiation therapy after breast surgery: one group receives standard treatment over three weeks while another gets an experimental shorter course over two weeks. Both groups also get extra radiation focused on where the tumor was.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: ARM 2 - 3200cGY and boost to tumor bed of 4200cGY -10fractionsExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: ARM 1-4050cGY and boost to tumor bed of 4800cGY in 15fractionsExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

Radiation therapy - 3 weeks is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Radiation therapy for:
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Radiation therapy for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Radiation therapy for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,103
Recruited
1,157,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 61 early-stage breast cancer patients, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) effectively covered the planning target volume (PTV) with minimal dose to surrounding healthy tissues, achieving over 93% coverage at the prescribed dose.
The treatment resulted in low mean doses to the ipsilateral lung (1.8 Gy) and heart (0.8 Gy), indicating that 3D-CRT APBI is a safe and noninvasive option that could broaden access to effective breast cancer treatment.
Initial dosimetric experience using simple three-dimensional conformal external-beam accelerated partial-breast irradiation.Taghian, AG., Kozak, KR., Doppke, KP., et al.[2007]
Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) shows significantly better uniformity and conformity in radiation delivery compared to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), suggesting it may be more effective in targeting the tumor bed while sparing surrounding healthy tissue.
The study, which analyzed dosimetric parameters in 24 patients with left-sided breast cancer, indicates that APBI could minimize side effects and reduce treatment duration, making it a promising option for breast cancer treatment.
Comparison Of Accelerated Partial Breast Radiation Therapy And External Beam Radiation Therapy By Treatment Planning Indices.Hejazi, P., Tirtash, MJ., Khoshnazar, AK.[2022]
In a study of 520 early-stage breast cancer patients, external-beam accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) showed a low 10-year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) at 3.7%, which is comparable to the 2.5% seen with whole-breast irradiation (WBI).
APBI resulted in significantly less acute and late toxicity, along with better cosmetic outcomes, indicating it may be a safer and more patient-friendly option compared to traditional WBI.
Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Compared With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Randomized Phase III APBI-IMRT-Florence Trial.Meattini, I., Marrazzo, L., Saieva, C., et al.[2021]

Citations

Effectiveness of different accelerated partial breast ...Five-year outcomes, cosmesis, and toxicity with 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation.
Partial Breast Radiation Therapy in Low-Risk ...In this study it was demonstrated that MRI-guided adaptive partial breast irradiation is feasible, well tolerated and leads to low acute (11.1%) and early- ...
Quality of life in early breast cancer patients after adjuvant ...Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) represents a valid option for adjuvant therapy of selected early breast cancer (BC).
A Meta-Analysis of Trials of Partial Breast IrradiationA meta-analysis of aggregate data from published randomized trials was performed to examine the effectiveness of PBI compared with WBI in patients with ...
Accelerated partial breast irradiation: current status and future ...Radiation therapy is frequently utilized in the care plan of women with breast and results in less likelihood of local recurrence and possible survival benefit ...
Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI)APBI is an alternative approach to breast conserving therapy (BCT) where radiation (RT) is delivered over a shorter period of time compared with whole breast ...
Toxicity of external beam accelerated partial-breast irradiation ...External APBI demonstrated better feasibility and less toxicity than the standard regimen in the adjuvant setting for treating early breast cancer patients.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security