120 Participants Needed

Ruxolitinib vs Prednisone for Graft-versus-Host Disease

Recruiting at 2 trial locations
JH
SS
Overseen BySarah Starr
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to compare two treatments, Ruxolitinib (a JAK inhibitor) and Prednisone (a corticosteroid), to determine which is more effective as a first-line treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). GVHD occurs when donor cells attack the recipient's body after a bone marrow transplant. Participants must have chronic GVHD and require a first systemic treatment as determined by their doctor. The trial will assess whether Ruxolitinib serves as a suitable alternative to Prednisone in these cases. Candidates who have not previously received treatment for chronic GVHD and can take oral medications may qualify for this study. As a Phase 2 trial, this research measures the treatment's effectiveness in an initial, smaller group of people.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. However, no new immune suppressive therapy should be added within two weeks before joining the study.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research shows that ruxolitinib, the treatment being tested, is generally well-tolerated. Earlier studies found that many patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) who took ruxolitinib experienced positive results. Although some serious side effects, such as low white blood cell counts and low platelet counts, have been reported, these were uncommon.

The FDA has already approved ruxolitinib for treating chronic GVHD when other treatments have failed, indicating it has passed safety checks for that use. Now, researchers are testing it as a first treatment option for GVHD, studying its safety for this new application. As this study is in the early stages, it is important to consult a healthcare provider if considering participation.12345

Why do researchers think this study treatment might be promising for GVHD?

Ruxolitinib is unique because it targets the JAK1 and JAK2 pathways, which play a key role in the inflammatory process involved in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Unlike the standard treatment of prednisone, which broadly suppresses the immune system, ruxolitinib offers a more precise approach by interrupting specific signaling pathways that drive inflammation. Researchers are excited about ruxolitinib because it has the potential to reduce symptoms more effectively while minimizing some of the side effects associated with traditional steroid treatments like prednisone.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for chronic GVHD?

This trial will compare Ruxolitinib with Prednisone for treating graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Research has shown that Ruxolitinib, which participants in this trial may receive, is effective for treating chronic GVHD. In one study, 78.3% of patients responded positively to Ruxolitinib. Patients taking Ruxolitinib also tend to experience fewer severe cases of chronic GVHD, and many can stop using corticosteroids while on Ruxolitinib. This evidence suggests that Ruxolitinib could be a promising treatment option for people with GVHD.34567

Who Is on the Research Team?

Farhad Khimani | Moffitt

Farhad Khimani, MD

Principal Investigator

Moffitt Cancer Center

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for individuals with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after an allogeneic transplant. Participants should need systemic therapy but haven't yet been treated, or their condition didn't improve with initial treatments.

Inclusion Criteria

I agree to use birth control during the study.
I can take pills by mouth.
Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
See 4 more

Exclusion Criteria

I do not have active hepatitis B, C, or HIV.
My cancer has returned after a transplant.
Participants with psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
See 6 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either Ruxolitinib or Prednisone as first-line therapy for chronic GVHD

6 months
Monthly visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Prednisone
  • Ruxolitinib
Trial Overview The study compares Ruxolitinib to Prednisone as a first-line treatment for chronic GVHD. It's a phase 2 randomized trial where participants are randomly assigned to receive either Ruxolitinib or Prednisone to evaluate effectiveness and safety.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Ruxolitinib Treatment ArmExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Prednisone Treatment ArmActive Control1 Intervention

Prednisone is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Prednisone for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Prednisone for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Prednisone for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Lead Sponsor

Trials
576
Recruited
145,000+

Incyte Corporation

Industry Sponsor

Trials
408
Recruited
66,800+
Steven Stein profile image

Steven Stein

Incyte Corporation

Chief Medical Officer since 2015

MD from University of Witwatersrand

Hervé Hoppenot profile image

Hervé Hoppenot

Incyte Corporation

Chief Executive Officer since 2014

MBA from ESSEC Business School

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 156 patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), treatment with MSC-FFM showed an overall response rate of 46% in adults and 64% in children, indicating its potential effectiveness in this challenging condition.
The median overall survival for patients treated with MSC-FFM was 5.8 months, significantly better than the 28 days reported for patients not receiving MSC treatment, highlighting the potential benefit of MSC-FFM in improving survival outcomes.
Real-world data suggest effectiveness of the allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells preparation MSC-FFM in ruxolitinib-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease.Bonig, H., Verbeek, M., Herhaus, P., et al.[2023]
In a study of 35 patients with steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), ruxolitinib demonstrated a high overall response rate of 89%, with 26% achieving complete response after a median of 4 weeks of treatment.
The long-term follow-up showed that 67% of surviving patients were free of immunosuppression, indicating ruxolitinib's potential as a safe and effective second-line therapy for cGVHD, with manageable hematologic side effects.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.Ferreira, AM., Szor, RS., Molla, VC., et al.[2021]
In a study of 14 pediatric patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) treated with ruxolitinib, the overall response rate was 64.3%, indicating that ruxolitinib is an effective treatment option for children after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).
While ruxolitinib showed promising efficacy, 64.3% of patients experienced adverse effects, including cytopenia and infections, suggesting that while it is effective, monitoring for side effects is important in pediatric patients.
Ruxolitinib Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.Yan, WL., Zhao, FY., Gu, ME., et al.[2023]

Citations

Ruxolitinib treatment outcomes in acute graft-versus-host ...Two-thirds of the patients were able to discontinue CSs, and two-thirds were estimated to be alive at three years from the initiation of ruxolitinib treatment.
Early Intervention ResultsLearn about the results of early intervention with Jakafi® (ruxolitinib) in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD).
Long-term follow-up results of ruxolitinib as salvage ...Most patients presented with severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (15/23; 65.2%). The overall response rate was 78.3% (18/23) after a median treatment ...
Low rates of chronic graft-versus-host disease with ruxolitinib ...Prolonged ruxolitinib administration after allogeneic HCT is associated with low rates of clinically significant chronic GVHD.
Ruxolitinib plus steroids for acute graft versus host diseaseRuxolitinib with corticosteroids showed promising efficacy in improving response and failure free survival in our phase I study.
6.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38916742/
Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in the treatment of chronic ...Overall, ruxolitinib was relatively well-tolerated and showed outcomes comparable to the REACH3 trial in a heavily pretreated patient population.
Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III REACH2 TrialNumerically higher chronic GVHD rates were noted with ruxolitinib than with BAT from 12 months; however, 95% confidence intervals overlapped.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security