Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials
How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
1045 Sansome St, Suite 321, San Francisco, CA
hello@withpower.com(415) 900-4227
About UsClinical Trials by ConditionAll Clinical TrialsWork With Us
1
Directories
Conditions
Cities
States
Popular Categories
Depression & Anxiety
Neurology
Psychiatry
Pain
Metabolism
Treatments
Locations
Florida
New Jersey
North Carolina
Texas
Ohio
California
Pennsylvania
Kentucky
New York
Indiana
Psychology Related
Depression
Schizophrenia
Anxiety
PTSD
ADHD
Autism
Bipolar Disorder
Addiction
OCD
Eating Disorder
Treatments
Psilocybin
IVF
Dental Implant
Weight Loss
Smoking
Platelet-Rich Plasma
Testosterone
Saxenda
Melatonin
Entresto
Cities
Saint Louis
Columbus
Portland
Ann Arbor
Aurora
Salt Lake City
Rochester
Birmingham
Detroit
New Haven
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies
Cookies & Data Use Policy

At Power, we believe in using data responsibly to help you find the right clinical trials — without compromising your privacy. This page explains how we use cookies and personal data across www.withpower.com.

Before You Create a Profile

When you browse Power's website, you're opting in to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to improve your experience and help us understand how the site is used so that we can make improvements for you in the future. Specifically, we use cookies to:

Personalize Your Experience

We use cookies to customize your visit based on basic information like your general location (determined by your IP address). This allows us to:

  • Show you clinical trials that are geographically relevant to you
  • Tailor search results to match the conditions or keywords you've explored before
  • Pre-fill certain fields or remember your previous searches, so you don't have to repeat them

Save Your Preferences

We remember what you interact with during your visit — for example:

  • The conditions you search for
  • Whether you prefer certain types of studies (e.g., paid trials, trials for a specific age group)
  • Your sorting or filtering preferences when browsing trials

This helps us make your experience more efficient and personalized the next time you visit.

Understand How the Site Is Used

Cookies help us collect anonymous usage data so we can make Power better. We use these insights to:

  • Monitor how users move through the site — for example, which pages get the most traffic and where users tend to exit
  • Track how long visitors stay on each page and whether they find what they’re looking for
  • Identify points of friction or confusion so we can improve usability
  • Test design changes (like different page layouts or buttons) and measure which version performs better
  • Detect and fix bugs or slow-loading pages to maintain site reliability

These analytics are aggregated and do not include personal identifiers. We use tools like Google Analytics to process this data, but we don't use it to target ads or sell your information.

We do not:

  • Sell or share your personal data with advertisers
  • Use your behavior on our site to target you with third-party ads

All cookie use is designed to support your experience on Power — never to track you across the internet or monetize your information.

After You Create a Profile

When you sign up for a Power account, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. Creating a profile allows us to better serve you by tailoring the platform to your specific needs.

Once you create a profile:

  • We may collect additional information about your health and clinical interests to help us match you to the most relevant studies.
  • We continue to use cookies to remember your session, keep you logged in, and personalize your dashboard.
  • You have full control — you can delete your profile at any time, and we'll remove your personal data in accordance with our privacy practices.

We use your data solely to fulfill our mission: helping you find clinical trials that could be a fit — not for advertising or resale.

·Security
Condition
Suggested Conditions
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Weight Loss
  • Heart Disease
  • Cancer
  • Asthma
Location

    Surgical Site Infection

    Current Location

    Search
    Surgical Site Infection
    Show Map
    Map View
    Your Location
    Search Clinical Trials
    Conditions
    Suggestions
    • Anxiety
    • Depression
    • Alzheimer's Disease
    • Weight Loss
    • Heart Disease
    • Cancer
    • Asthma
    Locations
    Suggestions
      Treatment Type
      Suggestions
      • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
      • Medication Management
      • Group Therapy
      • Psychotherapy
      • Mindfulness-Based Therapy
      • Exposure Therapy

      Trial Phase

      Trial Status

      Paid Participation

      Filters

      0

      Suggestions
      • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
      • Medication Management
      • Group Therapy
      • Psychotherapy
      • Mindfulness-Based Therapy
      • Exposure Therapy

      Paid Participation

      Trial Status

      Trial Phase

      Clear All
      Why We Started Power

      We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

      Bask
      Bask GillCEO at Power
      Learn More About Trials
      How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?

      36 Surgical Site Infection Trials Near You

      Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Surgical Site Infection patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

      Learn More About Power
      No Placebo
      Highly Paid
      Stay on Current Meds
      Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
      Breakthrough Medication

      Antibiotic Care for Fractures

      Columbus, Ohio
      The proposed study is a multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing current standard of care treatment to the SEXTANT treatment protocol in patients with Type III open fractures of the tibia and IIIB fractures of the ankle and hindfoot.
      No Placebo Group
      Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 3
      Age:18 - 64

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Severe Psychiatric Condition, Others

      1200 Participants Needed

      Topical Antibiotics for Surgical Site Infection

      Columbus, Ohio
      The overall objective is to compare the effect of Vancomycin and Tobramycin powder combined (treatment) to Vancomycin powder (control) in the reduction of post-fixation infections of tibial plateau and tibial pilon fractures at high risk of infection (collectively considered the "study injuries").
      No Placebo Group
      Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 3

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Infection, Myonecrosis, Pregnancy, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Vancomycin, Aminoglycosides

      1550 Participants Needed

      One-Stage vs Two-Stage Surgery for Joint Replacement Infections

      Cleveland, Ohio
      The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of two different treatment options commonly used to manage periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), an infection around the artificial knee or hip.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Systemic Sepsis, Fungal Infections, HIV, Others

      343 Participants Needed

      Dexamethasone Insert vs Steroid Drops for Postoperative Inflammation

      Cleveland, Ohio
      This study will assess the control of inflammation at days 1, 7, 14, and 21 days following the vitreoretinal surgical procedure analyzing two randomized study arms: Intracanalicular dexamethasone insert group or topical steroid drop group. Patients must be 18 years of age and older, of any race and either sex, requiring surgery with the procedure type of pars plana vitrectomy for either the indication of macular hole, epiretinal membrane removal, or vitreomacular traction.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Glaucoma, Diabetes, Pregnancy, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Narcotics, NSAIDs, Steroids, Others

      30 Participants Needed

      Tobramycin Injection for Open Fractures

      Lexington, Kentucky
      The goal of open extremity fracture (OEF) treatment is to promote fracture healing and restore function while preventing the development of infection. This is achieved through systematic and timely wound debridement and irrigation, fracture stabilization, tetanus prophylaxis, systemic and local antimicrobial therapy, and judicious timing of wound closure based on cleanliness. Early prophylactic systemic antibiotics lower infection rates in open fractures but have limitations of achieving adequate concentration at the hypoperfused wound area. OEF wounds are frequently poor in vasculature secondary to the soft tissue injury, hence adequate concentration of antibiotic cannot permeate to the tissue at risk. If systemic antibiotic concentrations are increased to achieve minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for pathogens at the wound, there is heightened concern for systemic drug toxicity. In sharp contrast, locally administered antibiotics achieve high drug concentration directly within the wound cavity with minimal systemic side effects. Local antibiotic therapy has shown to reduce rates of open fracture wound infection. With the serious implications of postoperative infections in OEF, it is imperative that all measures including further use of prophylactic local antibiotics be considered to prevent fracture-related infection (FRI). The overarching hypothesis for this project is that a novel synergistic combination of local aqueous tobramycin plus perioperative weight-based IV cephalosporin antibiotic prophylaxis will reduce the rate of FRI one year after OEF surgery. This in turn will improve OEF patient outcomes, decreasing morbidity and return to the operating room (OR) without any adverse effect on fracture healing. Regardless of the treatment group, bacterial speciation will be determined for patients that do develop FRI to help guide future treatment. The goal is to improve the clinical outcome and recovery of the population that sustains an OEF by decreasing the rate of FRI and fracture nonunions while concurrently educating on bacterial speciation and resistance.
      No Placebo Group
      Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 3

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Under 18, Pregnancy, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Aminoglycosides

      600 Participants Needed

      Aqueous vs Alcohol Chlorhexidine for Cesarean Section Infection

      Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
      This trial is testing two different skin cleaning solutions to see which one better prevents infections after a cesarean section. The study involves patients who are having a cesarean delivery. The cleaning solutions work by killing germs on the skin before surgery to reduce the risk of infection. One solution has been compared to another in various studies for its effectiveness in reducing surgical site infections.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4
      Age:18 - 50
      Sex:Female

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Allergy To Chlorhexidine, Chorioamnionitis, Others

      1470 Participants Needed

      Zinc Oxide vs. Petrolatum for Scarring

      Pittsburgh, PA, Pennsylvania
      Patients undergoing routine surgery in the Department of Dermatology for any indication on non-scalp skin and closed in linear fashion with scar greater than or equal to 4.5cm in length will be invited to participate in this split scar, head to head study comparing zinc oxide and petrolatum. Patients will apply respective ointments to each half of scar daily for one month and maintain a log of these activities. They will be seen at 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-operatively for photographic scar assessment and to complete the patient portion of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), a quantitative objective assessment of scar appearance. Trained observers (board-certified dermatologists) will score the observer portion of the scale. POSAS outcomes, post-operative infections, linear density of epidermal seal will be assessed at the 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-operative periods and compared between the two groups. Participants will have parking validated for all visits and upon completion of all portions of the study will receive a standardized skin care gift bag containing samples for hypoallergenic skin care products (washes, moisturizers, etc.).
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Early Phase 1

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Under 18, Asymmetric Scar, Infection, Others

      30 Participants Needed

      Cefoxitin for Appendicitis

      Ann Arbor, Michigan
      This research is studying a drug called cefoxitin already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce the risk of infection after surgery to remove an appendix. Researchers are studying a large group of people to continue to learn how best to dose antibiotics. This research will compare the current standard treatment which is a single dose prior to surgery to a new method that includes adding another dose of cefoxitin within 30 minutes of starting the surgery. This study will measure cefoxitin concentrations in blood, fat, and appendix tissue samples to compare the standard dosing method to our new method. This information will help us figure out the right dose of this drug to prevent infection after surgery to remove an appendix.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 1

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Prisoners, Pregnant, Perforation, Abscess

      46 Participants Needed

      Povidone-Iodine for Surgical Site Infection

      Indianapolis, Indiana
      This trial tests if applying a special solution inside the noses of patients with severe leg, ankle, or foot fractures can reduce their risk of infections after surgery. These patients need quick operations and are at high risk for infections. The solution helps by killing bacteria that could cause these infections. This solution is widely used among surgeons for its effectiveness in reducing infections after surgery.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Iodine Allergy, Pregnancy, Active Infection, Others

      2000 Participants Needed

      STRATAFIX for Wound Closure

      Lansing, Michigan
      This research is studying a device already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat wound closures. Researchers are studying a large group of people to continue to learn information about the safety of the STRATAFIX suture and how people's bodies react to using it over a long period of time. This research will provide additional information about using STRATAFIX sutures to close surgical wounds.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Prior Wound Dehiscence, Suture Allergy

      160 Participants Needed

      Single-Dose Antibiotics for Preventing Surgical Site Infections

      Roanoke, Virginia
      The purpose of the study is to assess the effectiveness of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic in reducing surgical site infections in certain dermatological procedures. Patients will undergo surgical excision or Mohs surgery as is clinically indicated and part of usual care. The study will be a double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be assigned to one of three participant categories: 1) patients undergoing repair with skin flap or graft on the nose, 2) patients undergoing repair with skin graft, flap, or wedge resection on the ear, or 3) patients undergoing Mohs surgery with closure or partial closure or surgical excision on the lower extremity below the knee. Within each category, participants will be randomized into one of two groups: group one will receive a preoperative placebo pill and group two will receive preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (either a single dose of Cephalexin 2g PO or single dose of Clindamycin hydrochloride 600 mg PO if allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin). Patients will followed for 30 days +/- 7 after surgery to evaluate for any surgical site infection.

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Mental Impairment, Pregnancy, Recent Prosthetic, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Antibiotics

      1600 Participants Needed

      D-PLEX for Surgical Site Infection

      Chicago, Illinois
      Phase III, Prospective, Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Two-arm, Double Blind Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of D-PLEX Administered Concomitantly with the Standard of Care (SoC), Compared to a SoC Treated Control Arm, in Prevention of Post Abdominal Surgery Incisional Infection.
      No Placebo Group
      Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Active Infection, Recent Surgery, Allergies, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Antibiotics, Anticancer, Investigational Drugs, Others

      624 Participants Needed

      Wound Irrigation for Surgical Site Infection

      Toronto, Ontario
      A surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs after a surgical procedure. Despite a variety of infection prevention strategies, SSIs still occur often and impose a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system. Intraoperative irrigation (or washing of the surgical incision before closure) may reduce SSIs, but this is uncertain. The Clinical Evaluation of Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery Utilizing Intraoperative Incisional Wound Irrigation (CLEAN Wound) trial aims to determine if incisional wound irrigation with an antiseptic or salt water solution can reduce SSIs within 30 days of surgery compared to no wound irrigation. 2,500 patients aged 18 years or older who are planned to undergo an abdominal or groin open or laparoscopic procedure will be randomly assigned to incisional wound irrigation with povidone-iodine solution; or incisional wound irrigation with saline; or no irrigation and followed for 30 days after surgery to assess the incidence of SSIs, with additional outcomes collected up to 90 days after surgery. Even with significant advances in medicine over the past decades, there are still many fundamental issues in perioperative care that remain unclear due to lack of evidence. If this trial were to demonstrate that intraoperative wound irrigation reduces the incidence of SSI, these practice-changing findings could greatly benefit patients worldwide.

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Povidone-iodine Allergy, Active Infection, Dirty Incision

      2500 Participants Needed

      Oral Antibiotics vs. No Prep for Colon Resection Surgery

      Toronto, Ontario
      The REaCT NSQIP will compare oral antibiotics vs. no antibiotics, which are two standards of care treatments for preoperative preparation of the bowel prior to colorectal surgery
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Rectal Resection, Emergency Surgery, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Metronidazole, Neomycin

      630 Participants Needed

      Antimicrobial Therapy for Infections

      Nashville, Tennessee
      This is a Phase 3 multi-center, group-randomized, crossover trial to compare nasal antimicrobial photodisinfection therapy (aPDT) with standard of care for prevention of surgical site infections in patients undergoing major elective, urgent, or emergent surgeries in a hospital setting. The main outcomes are to: 1. compare the efficacy, and 2. estimate the safety of applying nasal (aPDT) before surgery in reducing the incidence of SSIs within the initial 30 days after surgery compared to standard of care (SOC). Participants in the intervention group will receive aPDT prior to surgery on the day of surgery. Participants in the control group will receive standard of care surgical site prevention measures prior to surgery.
      No Placebo Group
      Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 3

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Recent Surgery, Infection, Others

      4514 Participants Needed

      Showering With Drains for Surgical Site Infection Risk

      Danville, Pennsylvania
      This is a prospective randomized, controlled, unblinded, interventional feasibility study to evaluate if showering with post operative drains in place leads to an increase in complications. The patients included in the study will be those undergoing breast reductions and panniculectomies at Geisinger Medical Center. The patients will be randomized post operatively into one of two groups: 1) patients instructed to shower with drains in place, and 2) patients instructed not to shower while they have drains in place.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Healthcare Workers, Kidney Transplant, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Antibiotics

      100 Participants Needed

      Xperience™ Irrigation for Surgical Site Infections

      Chapel Hill, North Carolina
      Goal of the Clinical Trial: The purpose of this clinical trial is to learn whether Xperience™ surgical irrigation solution is more effective than a standard dilute povidone-iodine solution in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) following implant-based breast reconstruction in female patients, aged 18 and older. It will also assess the safety and overall surgical outcomes when using Xperience™ compared to povidone-iodine. Main Questions the Study Aims to Answer: * Does the use of Xperience™ decrease the incidence of surgical site infections compared to povidone-iodine? * What are the differences in the rates of premature implant removal due to infection between patients treated with Xperience™ and those treated with povidone-iodine? * Are there fewer post-surgical complications with Xperience™ compared to povidone-iodine? Study Design: Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive either Xperience™ or a dilute povidone-iodine solution during their bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Only the research team will know which irrgiation is given- the participant will not know. Participant Will: * Undergo the surgical procedure using one of the two irrigation solutions. * Receive regular post-operative check-ups to monitor for signs of infection and other complications. * Have data collected on any post-surgical complications, the necessity for early implant removal, and overall surgical outcomes.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Sex:Female

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Unilateral Mastectomy, Autologous Reconstruction, Pregnant, Others

      224 Participants Needed

      Probiotics for Gut Microbiome Imbalance

      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
      This study aims to evaluate whether probiotics can help maintain a healthy gut microbiome in patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics during elective orthopedic surgery. Antibiotics, while effective in preventing infections, can disrupt the balance of gut bacteria, leading to dysbiosis. The study hypothesizes that the use of probiotics during the perioperative period can prevent or reduce this disruption, supporting gut health and overall well-being. The research seeks to answer whether combining probiotics with routine antibiotic prophylaxis can preserve gut microbiome balance and improve patient outcomes.

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4
      Age:18 - 65

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Autoimmune, Chronic Intestinal, Others
      Must Be Taking:Antibiotics

      60 Participants Needed

      Antibacterial Soap + Ointment for Wound Infection

      Marlton, New Jersey
      The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if reducing bacterial load on the skin and nostrils with topical antibacterial soap and ointment, respectively, reduces rate of infection in surgical sites on lower leg wounds left open to heal in adults undergoing skin cancer surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: Does Hibiclens antibacterial skin cleanser and mupirocin antibacterial ointment applied to nostrils prior to surgery lower the number of times participants develop an infection in their open wound on the lower leg? Researchers will compare the treatment group to the standard of care, which involves no treatment prior to surgery, to see if topical antibiotics applied prior to surgery affect infection rates between the two groups. Participants randomized to the treatment group will: Shower with Hibiclens once daily for 5 days prior to the day of surgery and apply mupirocin to the nostrils twice daily for 5 days prior to the day of surgery. They will then send pictures of their surgical site to monitor for signs of infection at 2-week and 4-week post-operation. Participants randomized to the control group (standard of care) will: NOT apply the topical antibacterials prior to the day of surgery. They will then send pictures of their surgical site to monitor for signs of infection at 2-week intervals for 1 month after surgery.
      No Placebo Group
      Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 3

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Allergy To Chlorhexidine, Mupirocin, Staphylococcus Infection, Others

      848 Participants Needed

      Probiotics for Prosthetic Joint Infection

      New York, New York
      Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) of the hip and knee. Standard of care (SOC) treatment includes surgery and antimicrobials. Morbidity and mortality remain high despite contemporary treatments. The human body is colonized by billions of organisms, collectively, the microbiome, which is central to healthy immune function. Microbiome disruption, dysbiosis, can impair the immune response to infection. Despite recent evidence that suggests dysbiosis may be implicated in PJI, the role of probiotics in the treatment of PJI is unknown. Perioperative probiotics have been demonstrated to be safe and effective for infection prevention in abdominal surgery. The investigators hypothesize that perioperative probiotics will reduce re-infection in patients treated for PJI. A multi-centered, randomized controlled trial (RCT) at two academic, tertiary care centers will be conducted to determine the impact of probiotics on recurrent infection following treatment for PJI. Controls will receive SOC; study patients will receive a probiotic, started shortly after the initiation of and for the duration of their antibiotic therapy + 7 days, in addition to SOC. Primary outcome is re-operation for recurrent infection within 1 year.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Fungal PJI, Immunocompromised, Gut Issues, Others
      Must Be Taking:Antibiotics

      152 Participants Needed

      Why Other Patients Applied

      "I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."

      WR
      Obesity PatientAge: 58

      "I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."

      FF
      ADHD PatientAge: 31

      "As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."

      IZ
      Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38

      "I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."

      AG
      Paralysis PatientAge: 50

      "I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."

      ID
      Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40
      Match to a Surgical Site Infection Trial

      Mepilex Ag Dressing for Postpartum Infection

      The Bronx, New York
      The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether using a silver-containing antimicrobial foam dressing (Mepilex Ag) can help prevent surgical site infections in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does Mepilex Ag reduce the rate of surgical site infections after cesarean delivery? 2. Is Mepilex Ag more effective than standard wound dressings in preventing infection? Researchers will compare those who receive the Mepilex Ag dressing to those who receive the standard dressing to see if the silver impregnated antimicrobial foam dressing lowers infection rate. Participants will: 1. Undergo a routine cesarean delivery as per usual obstetric indication 2. Be randomly assigned to receive either a silver-containing foam dressing or a standard dressing after surgery 3. Be monitored for wound complications and signs of infection during the postpartum period
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Sex:Female

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Silver Allergy, Skin Infection, Immunocompromised, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Chemotherapy, Steroids

      480 Participants Needed

      High Dose Insulin for Surgical Site Infections

      Montreal, Quebec
      Despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, the high incidence of postoperative surgical site infections remains a major problem in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (liver, pancreatic and colorectal surgery). Using the hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp technique, i.e. continuous infusion of insulin combined with dextrose titrated to "clamp" blood glucose between 4 and 6 mmol/L, we successfully established and preserved normoglycemia during the perioperative period. Our objective of this study is to determine if the maintenance of perioperative normoglycemia by a hyperinsulinemic normoglycemic clamp reduces the rates of incisional and space/ surgical site infections following abdominal surgery (liver, pancreatic and colorectal surgery).

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Diabetes, Hypertension, Bipolar, Others

      460 Participants Needed

      Irrigation Solution for Preventing Infections in Spinal Surgery

      Providence, Rhode Island
      Various spine surgeons perform wound irrigation using saline mixed with vancomycin, relying on mechanical debridement of non-viable tissue, physical disruption of biofilm, and bacteriostatic effect against gram positive flora. When used as a powder, topical application of vancomycin has demonstrated increased risk of symptomatic seroma formation, which is an adverse outcome that often requires bedside or intra-operative aspiration. Broad-spectrum antiseptic agents, such as Irrisept, offer bacteriocidal properties to eliminate hardware inoculation, thereby minimizing the risk of deep space infection, while obviating the risk of seroma development.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Open Wounds, Non-spinal Infection, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Antibiotics

      200 Participants Needed

      Bioelectric Dressing for Wound Infections

      Kissimmee, Florida
      The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of using Bioelectric wound dressing on the pre-operative wound site and post operatively and compared it outcomes to the standard of care chlorhexidine skin preparation.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Not Listed

      20 Participants Needed

      Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical Wound

      Tampa, Florida
      This randomized trial will use a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy device or standard wound closure, in participants with gastrointestinal neoplasms, to measure the rate of surgical site infections
      No Placebo Group
      Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 2, 3

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Emergency Surgery, Others

      300 Participants Needed

      Chlorhexidine for Wound Infection in Emergency Surgery

      Tyler, Texas
      This is a single institution, randomized study conducted to determine if irrigation with Irrisept in emergency general surgery patients results in lower surgical site infections compared to normal saline irrigation.

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Under 18, Pressure Wounds, Others

      400 Participants Needed

      Vancomycin Powder for Broken Bones

      Winnipeg, Manitoba
      The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare the rate of post-operative infection in patients with open fractures in upper or lower extremity long bones randomized to receive intra-operative intrawound topical vancomycin powder on their open fractures in addition to the current best practice of intravenous antibiotics with irrigation and debridement compared to intravenous antibiotics with irrigation and debridement alone during definitive operative fixation of the fracture.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Vancomycin Allergy, Infection, Bacteremia, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Local Antibiotics

      350 Participants Needed

      Antibiotics for Infections After Trauma Surgery

      Houston, Texas
      The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 2 prophylactic antibiotic regimens, ertapenem and cefazolin with metronidazole, in preventing organ space surgical site infections (OS-SSI) after emergency trauma laparotomy embedded into routine clinical care and to validate a Bayesian OS-SSI risk calculator using Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) standardized variables
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Allergy To Cephalosporins, Prisoners, Others

      300 Participants Needed

      Antibiotics for Preventing Surgical Infections

      Halifax, Nova Scotia
      Orthognathic surgery describes a group of procedures aimed at correcting developmental or acquired deformities of the jaws and facial skeleton. The goal of these procedures is to improve speech, jaw and dental function, aesthetics, and symptoms of sleep apnea. This is accomplished by surgical repositioning of the upper jaw (maxilla) and lower jaw (mandible). The most common procedures are lefort I osteotomies (upper jaw repositioning) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (lower jaw repositioning). At our institution, almost all cases include one or both of these two procedures. The majority of cases include bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO). As access to the jaws is through the oral cavity, these procedures are considered to be clean-contaminated surgeries due to the high intra-oral bacterial load. The result is that surgical site infections (SSIs) occur in 10-15% of cases. Studies show that the vast majority of these infections occur in the lower jaw (BSSO sites), presumably due to pooling of saliva and debris. SSIs are associated with patient discomfort, prolonged hospital stays, increased morbidity, and increased cost to healthcare systems. The use of peri-operative antibiotics has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of SSI following orthognathic surgery. There is currently no consensus on the dosing or specific antibiotic to be used. There is strong evidence that pre-operative antibiotics significantly decrease SSI compared to no antibiotics. However, to date, there is no good evidence to support the use of post-operative antibiotics to further decrease the rate of infection. Several studies have examined the use of post-operative antibiotics ranging between 1-7 days. The majority of studies were not able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference to justify the use of post-operative antibiotics. A systematic review by Danda and Ravi in 2011 suggested that there likely is a benefit to the use of post-operative antibiotics. Danda and colleagues in 2017 later conducted a trial comparing pre-operative antibiotics alone compared to pre-operative combined with post-operative antibiotics. A statistically significant difference was not found, however, they felt that this was due to a limited sample size. Overall, there is no robust data that supports the use of post-operative antibiotics. The World Health Organization guidelines currently recommend against the use of post-operative antibiotics in orthognathic surgery. However, they do comment that there is some weak evidence that suggests its use. It was deemed that this low quality evidence did not outweigh the potential harm of antimicrobial resistance, which results from inappropriate overuse of antibiotics. Antimicrobial resistance is a serious, growing problem which has deadly consequences. Our current protocol at the QEII Health Sciences Center for peri-operative antibiotic administration is a single pre-operative dose of 2g cefazolin IV, followed by further doses every 8 hours post-operatively for a total of 24 hours (3 post-operative doses). Our study aims to investigate whether there is a need for these additional post-operative doses. If there is a benefit to these additional doses, the research team aims to investigate whether this benefit outweighs the risks. This question is of great importance in order to avoid an unnecessary contribution to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary potential adverse effects. Participants will be assigned a study number and randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group A will receive a single pre-operative dose of 2g IV cefazolin. Group B will receive a pre-operative dose of 2g IV cefazolin, followed by an additional three doses post-operatively every 8 hours for a total of 24 hours. Informed consent will be obtained at each participant's pre-operative assessment in the days leading up to the procedure. The participant will then select a group designation from a sufficiently mixed jar, and group A or B will be assigned to their study number. For each patient, the procedures completed will be documented, along with age, sex, smoking status, length of procedures, and complications. Complications including medication adverse reaction (allergy, toxicity, side effects), surgical complications, and any other significant complications related to the medications or deemed to be relevant to infection risk will be documented. Procedures will be carried out in the standard fashion. Patients will receive the same post-operative instructions and will be discharged with a chlorhexidine mouth rinse to be used for two weeks. Patients will return for follow-up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks post-operatively. Surgical site infection diagnosis will be made according to the CDC criteria and will be reported as either superficial, deep, or organ/space infections. Date of occurrence, location of infection, and treatment provided will be recorded on a standard form provided to surgeons.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4
      Age:16+

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Immunosuppression, Infections, Allergies, Others
      Must Not Be Taking:Antibiotics, Immunosuppressants

      400 Participants Needed

      Wound Irrigation vs Pursestring Closure for Ostomy Wounds

      Las Vegas, Nevada
      The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two types of closure in patients with ostomies that are ready for closure. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Surgical site infection rates 2. Patient quality of life 3. Time to wound healing Participants will undergo either complete ostomy wound closure after washing out the wound with Prontosan, or their ostomy wound will be closed using the Pursestring method, where the wound will be left partially open and allowed to heal from the inside out. Researchers will compare these two groups' outcomes (questions to be answered) as listed above.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Phase 4

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Under 18, Unable To Consent

      84 Participants Needed

      12

      Know someone looking for new options?
      Spread the word

      Why We Started Power

      We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

      Bask
      Bask GillCEO at Power
      Learn More About Trials
      How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?
      Match to a Trial
      Match to a Trial

      Popular Searches

      By Condition

      Depression Clinical Trials

      Anxiety Clinical Trials

      Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

      ADHD Clinical Trials

      Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials

      Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

      Autism Clinical Trials

      Treatment Resistant Depression Clinical Trials

      Borderline Personality Disorder Clinical Trials

      Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

      Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials

      Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

      By Location

      Clinical Trials in California

      Clinical Trials in Florida

      Clinical Trials in Texas

      Clinical Trials in New York

      Clinical Trials in Ohio

      Clinical Trials in Illinois

      Clinical Trials in Pennsylvania

      Clinical Trials in Michigan

      Clinical Trials in North Carolina

      Clinical Trials in Massachusetts

      Clinical Trials in Missouri

      Clinical Trials in Minnesota

      Other People Viewed

      By Subject

      171 Clinical Trials near Eden Prairie, MN

      Top Clinical Trials near Herndon, VA

      18 Glaucoma Trials near Los Angeles, CA

      Top Clinical Trials near Hobart, IN

      Top Breast Cancer Clinical Trials near Los Angeles, CA

      Top Clinical Trials near New York

      85 Clinical Trials near Illinois

      73 Diabetes Trials near Newport News, VA

      Top Clinical Trials near Apopka, FL

      22 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Trials near Houston, TX

      Top Diabetes Clinical Trials

      Top Clinical Trials near Newark, DE

      By Trial

      Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer

      Geriatric Assessment for Cancer in Seniors with Frailty or Cognitive Impairment

      Mobile App for Postoperative Recovery

      BDC-1001 +/− Pertuzumab for Breast Cancer

      Regorafenib + Anti-EGFR Therapy for Colorectal Cancer

      Buspirone for Traumatic Brain Injury Irritability and Aggression

      Physiotherapy for Urinary Incontinence in Gynecologic Cancer Survivors

      MLN0128 for Cancer

      Tagraxofusp + Venetoclax + Azacitidine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

      Balance Training for Stroke

      Amplification of Positivity + Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcoholism

      School Readiness Program for Sickle Cell Disease

      Frequently Asked Questions

      How much do Surgical Site Infection clinical trials pay?

      Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

      How do Surgical Site Infection clinical trials work?

      After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Surgical Site Infection trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Surgical Site Infection is 12 months.

      How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

      Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

      What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

      The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

      Do I need to be insured to participate in a Surgical Site Infection medical study?

      Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

      What are the newest Surgical Site Infection clinical trials?

      Most recently, we added STRATAFIX for Wound Closure, Mepilex Ag Dressing for Postpartum Infection and Probiotics for Prosthetic Joint Infection to the Power online platform.