400 Participants Needed

Antibiotics for Preventing Surgical Infections

AE
CG
Overseen ByCurtis Gregoire, MD, DDS, MSc
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, if you have used antibiotics in the two weeks before the trial, you would not be eligible to participate.

What data supports the effectiveness of the drug Cefazolin in preventing surgical infections?

Research shows that Cefazolin significantly reduces the rate of wound infections in surgeries, such as colorectal and abdominal surgeries, with infection rates dropping from 32% to 10% and from 25% to 9%, respectively. This suggests that Cefazolin is effective in preventing surgical infections.12345

Is cefazolin generally safe for preventing surgical infections?

Cefazolin is commonly used to prevent infections during surgery and is considered safe for most people. It is less likely to cause adverse reactions compared to alternative antibiotics, especially in patients without a penicillin allergy.26789

How does cefazolin differ from other drugs for preventing surgical infections?

Cefazolin is unique because it is a first-line antibiotic used to prevent surgical site infections, especially effective and safer compared to second-line options like clindamycin or vancomycin, which are often used in patients with a penicillin allergy. It is typically given as a single dose before surgery, which has been shown to significantly reduce infection rates.79101112

What is the purpose of this trial?

Orthognathic surgery describes a group of procedures aimed at correcting developmental or acquired deformities of the jaws and facial skeleton. The goal of these procedures is to improve speech, jaw and dental function, aesthetics, and symptoms of sleep apnea. This is accomplished by surgical repositioning of the upper jaw (maxilla) and lower jaw (mandible). The most common procedures are lefort I osteotomies (upper jaw repositioning) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (lower jaw repositioning). At our institution, almost all cases include one or both of these two procedures. The majority of cases include bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO). As access to the jaws is through the oral cavity, these procedures are considered to be clean-contaminated surgeries due to the high intra-oral bacterial load. The result is that surgical site infections (SSIs) occur in 10-15% of cases. Studies show that the vast majority of these infections occur in the lower jaw (BSSO sites), presumably due to pooling of saliva and debris. SSIs are associated with patient discomfort, prolonged hospital stays, increased morbidity, and increased cost to healthcare systems.The use of peri-operative antibiotics has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of SSI following orthognathic surgery. There is currently no consensus on the dosing or specific antibiotic to be used. There is strong evidence that pre-operative antibiotics significantly decrease SSI compared to no antibiotics. However, to date, there is no good evidence to support the use of post-operative antibiotics to further decrease the rate of infection. Several studies have examined the use of post-operative antibiotics ranging between 1-7 days. The majority of studies were not able to demonstrate a statistically significant difference to justify the use of post-operative antibiotics. A systematic review by Danda and Ravi in 2011 suggested that there likely is a benefit to the use of post-operative antibiotics. Danda and colleagues in 2017 later conducted a trial comparing pre-operative antibiotics alone compared to pre-operative combined with post-operative antibiotics. A statistically significant difference was not found, however, they felt that this was due to a limited sample size. Overall, there is no robust data that supports the use of post-operative antibiotics. The World Health Organization guidelines currently recommend against the use of post-operative antibiotics in orthognathic surgery. However, they do comment that there is some weak evidence that suggests its use. It was deemed that this low quality evidence did not outweigh the potential harm of antimicrobial resistance, which results from inappropriate overuse of antibiotics. Antimicrobial resistance is a serious, growing problem which has deadly consequences.Our current protocol at the QEII Health Sciences Center for peri-operative antibiotic administration is a single pre-operative dose of 2g cefazolin IV, followed by further doses every 8 hours post-operatively for a total of 24 hours (3 post-operative doses). Our study aims to investigate whether there is a need for these additional post-operative doses. If there is a benefit to these additional doses, the research team aims to investigate whether this benefit outweighs the risks. This question is of great importance in order to avoid an unnecessary contribution to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary potential adverse effects.Participants will be assigned a study number and randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group A will receive a single pre-operative dose of 2g IV cefazolin. Group B will receive a pre-operative dose of 2g IV cefazolin, followed by an additional three doses post-operatively every 8 hours for a total of 24 hours.Informed consent will be obtained at each participant's pre-operative assessment in the days leading up to the procedure. The participant will then select a group designation from a sufficiently mixed jar, and group A or B will be assigned to their study number.For each patient, the procedures completed will be documented, along with age, sex, smoking status, length of procedures, and complications. Complications including medication adverse reaction (allergy, toxicity, side effects), surgical complications, and any other significant complications related to the medications or deemed to be relevant to infection risk will be documented. Procedures will be carried out in the standard fashion. Patients will receive the same post-operative instructions and will be discharged with a chlorhexidine mouth rinse to be used for two weeks. Patients will return for follow-up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks post-operatively. Surgical site infection diagnosis will be made according to the CDC criteria and will be reported as either superficial, deep, or organ/space infections. Date of occurrence, location of infection, and treatment provided will be recorded on a standard form provided to surgeons.

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for patients over the age of 16 who are healthy or have mild systemic disease (ASA 1 and 2) and are scheduled for orthognathic surgery to correct jaw deformities. It aims to determine if additional post-operative antibiotics reduce infection risk without contributing significantly to antibiotic resistance.

Inclusion Criteria

I am over 16 and considered low risk for surgery complications.

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Pre-operative Assessment

Informed consent is obtained and participants are randomly assigned to treatment groups

Days leading up to surgery
1 visit (in-person)

Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care

Participants undergo orthognathic surgery and receive assigned antibiotic regimen

1 day
Inpatient stay

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for surgical site infections and adverse effects

6 weeks
3 visits (in-person) at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-operatively

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Cefazolin
Trial Overview The study compares two groups: Group A receives a single pre-operative dose of cefazolin, while Group B gets the same plus three more doses after surgery. The goal is to see if more antibiotics post-surgery prevent infections better than just one dose before surgery.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Single DoseExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Single pre-operative dose of 2g IV Cefazolin given prior to first incision for orthognathic surgical procedure
Group II: 24-Hour DosingActive Control1 Intervention
Single pre-operative dose of 2g IV Cefazolin given prior to first incision for orthognathic surgical procedure, as well as 2g IV Cefazolin q8h post-operatively for 24 hours (3 total doses)

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Abdul El-Rabbany

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1
Recruited
400+

Findings from Research

In a double-blind trial involving elective colorectal surgery, prophylactic administration of Cefazolin significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative wound infections from 32% in the control group to 10% in the treated group (P < 0.01).
Patients receiving Cefazolin also experienced a significant reduction in hospital stay by about 3 days (P < 0.05), indicating both safety and efficacy of the antibiotic in this surgical context.
[Antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery with Cefazolin].Dürig, M., Neff, U., Rittmann, WW., et al.[2013]
In a study of 57 patients undergoing elective surgery, 26% did not comply with national guidelines for cefazolin administration, which is used to prevent surgical-site infections (SSI).
Among those who did not follow the guidelines, 67% had low cefazolin levels at the end of the procedure, indicating a significant risk for inadequate infection prevention, while compliance with guidelines resulted in better outcomes, though it did not guarantee sufficient antibiotic levels.
End-of-procedure cefazolin concentrations after administration for prevention of surgical-site infection.Koopman, E., Nix, DE., Erstad, BL., et al.[2019]
A single dose of 1 g of cephazolin significantly reduced the rate of postoperative infections in patients undergoing clean lumbar spine surgeries, with 9 infections in the cephazolin group compared to 21 in the placebo group (p < 0.05).
While cephazolin was effective in reducing infections, it was associated with a higher isolation rate of cephazolin-resistant pathogens, indicating a potential risk for developing antibiotic resistance.
Perioperative prophylactic cephazolin in spinal surgery. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial.Rubinstein, E., Findler, G., Amit, P., et al.[2022]

References

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery with Cefazolin]. [2013]
End-of-procedure cefazolin concentrations after administration for prevention of surgical-site infection. [2019]
Perioperative prophylactic cephazolin in spinal surgery. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. [2022]
[Evaluation of the effectiveness of cefazolin++ (Kefzol) in preventing infections in patients after abdominal surgery]. [2013]
A prospective, randomized double-blind study of the use of antibiotics at the time of mastectomy. [2013]
Association of β-Lactam Allergy Documentation and Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Surgery: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Hospitalized Patients. [2021]
Cefazolin vs Second-line Antibiotics for Surgical Site Infection Prevention After Total Joint Arthroplasty Among Patients With a Beta-lactam Allergy. [2023]
Variability of surgical prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic children. [2019]
Preoperative penicillin allergy testing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. [2021]
Prophylactic use of cephazolin against wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. [2019]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Assessment of the Frequency of Dual Allergy to Penicillins and Cefazolin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. [2022]
Antibiotic prophylaxis in obese patients submitted to bariatric surgery. A systematic review. [2018]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security