Informed Consent

Current Location

11 Informed Consent Trials Near You

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Informed Consent patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Learn More About Power
No Placebo
Highly Paid
Stay on Current Meds
Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
Breakthrough Medication

Impella CP® for Heart Attack and Cardiogenic Shock

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
This trial is testing whether using an Impella device to help the heart pump blood before opening blocked arteries improves survival in patients with severe heart attacks and heart failure. The Impella device temporarily assists the heart, allowing it to rest while maintaining blood flow. The goal is to see if this approach reduces deaths compared to other treatments. The Impella device has been shown to improve blood flow in the heart and is used as a last-resort treatment in patients with severe heart conditions.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting

4 Participants Needed

Recruitment Methods for Stroke Rehabilitation

London, Ontario
Stroke is a major health issue in Canada. Stroke affects over 400,000 Canadians, and this number is expected to nearly double by 2038. Research studies in stroke recovery can help us better understand effective rehabilitation treatments and help reduce the burden of stroke. Some groups of people however are commonly not included in stroke studies. For example, it is more common for men to take part in research than women, and people with aphasia (a language impairment commonly seen after stroke) are often excluded from studies. Also, deciding whether to even take part in a research study can be difficult and overwhelming, especially in the early days after stroke, leaving many people to decline to participate. Research has shown that women experience different barriers to participating in stroke research than men. This means that research findings, and the decisions made during stroke care based on these findings, may not reflect the true stroke population. Better ways to help support groups like women and people with aphasia to participate in stroke research are needed, so that study findings will better represent people living with stroke.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

120 Participants Needed

High Calcium Crystalloid Therapy for Cardiac Arrest

Roanoke, Virginia
The Carilion Clinic and Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, in conjunction with Roanoke Fire-EMS, Botetourt County Department of Fire \& EMS and Salem Fire-EMS, are studying the outcomes of patients experiencing Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA). PEA refers to a type of cardiac arrest in which there is normal electrical activity in the heart however the heart still fails to contract to generate a pulse. Without heart contractions, which normally generates a pulse, the brain and other important organs fail to receive blood and oxygen. Unfortunately, the majority (97.3%) of patients that experience this rhythm do not survive and most don't even make it to the hospital. This study is trying to determine if the administration of a High Calcium, Low Sodium (HCLS) fluid in pre-hospital care will improve the chances of survival. Generally, a sodium (salt) solution is provided to patients experiencing cardiac arrest. Studies have shown that lower sodium and higher calcium content may activate certain parts of the heart cells required to generate a pulse under PEA conditions. This study is a double-blind, prospective, clinical trial. PEA patients will randomly receive either routine fluid therapy (salt solution) or a HCLS solution. While HCLS solution is not the standard fluid used by EMS providers responding to PEA, it is composed of FDA approved components and is occasionally used by EMS providers at their discretion in treating PEA. It is predicted that HCLS will either improve PEA survival or deliver similar outcomes as routine treatment. All patients will receive standard, high quality cardiac arrest and post-cardiac arrest care regardless of assigned treatment group.
No Placebo Group
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2, 3

342 Participants Needed

Genetic Counseling Chatbot for Kidney Donors

Chicago, Illinois
Living donor (LD) kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, LDs take on a higher risk of future ESKD themselves. African American (AA) LDs have an even greater, 3.3-fold, risk of ESKD than white LDs post-donation. Because evidence suggests that Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variants contribute to this greater risk, transplant nephrologists are increasingly using APOL1 testing to evaluate LD candidates of African ancestry. However, nephrologists do not consistently perform genetic counseling with LD candidates about APOL1 due to a lack of knowledge and skill in counseling about APOL1. Without proper counseling, APOL1 testing will magnify LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, jeopardizing their informed consent. Given their elevated risk of ESRD post-donation, and AAs' widely-held cultural concerns about genetic testing, it is ethically critical to protect AA LD candidates' safety through APOL1 testing in a culturally competent manner to improve informed decisions about donating. No transplant programs have integrated APOL1 testing into LD evaluation in a culturally competent manner. Clinical "chatbots," mobile apps that use artificial intelligence to provide genetic information to patients and relieve constraints on clinicians' time, can improve informed treatment decisions and reduce decisional conflict. The chatbot "Gia," created by a medical genetics company, can be adapted to any condition. However, no chatbot on APOL1is currently available. No counseling training programs are available for nephrologists to counsel AA LDs about APOL1 and donation in a culturally competent manner. Given the shortage of genetic counselors, increasing nephrologists' genetic literacy is critical to integrating genetic testing into practice. The objective of this study is to culturally adapt and evaluate the effectiveness of an APOL1testing program for AA LDs at two transplant centers serving large AA LD populations (Chicago, IL, and Washington, DC). The APOL1 testing program will evaluate the effect of the culturally competent testing, chatbot, and counseling on AA LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, preparedness for decision-making, willingness to donate, and satisfaction with informed consent. The specific aims are to: 1. Adapt Gia and transplant counseling to APOL1 for use in routine clinical practice 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on decisional conflict, preparedness, and willingness to donate in a pre-post design 3. Evaluate the implementation of this intervention into clinical practice by using the RE-AIM framework to longitudinally evaluate nephrologist counseling practices and LDs' satisfaction with informed consent. The impact of this study will be the creation of a model for APOL1 testing of AA LDs, which can then be implemented nationally via implementation science approaches. APOL1 will serve as a model for integrating culturally competent genetic testing into transplant and other practices to improve patient informed consent.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation

12 Participants Needed

APOL1 Genetic Testing for Kidney Disease

Chicago, Illinois
Living donor (LD) kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, LDs take on a higher risk of future ESKD themselves. African American (AA) LDs have an even greater, 3.3-fold, risk of ESKD than white LDs post-donation. Because evidence suggests that Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variants contribute to this greater risk, transplant nephrologists are increasingly using APOL1 testing to evaluate LD candidates of African ancestry. However, nephrologists do not consistently perform genetic counseling with LD candidates about APOL1 due to a lack of knowledge and skill in counseling about APOL1. Without proper counseling, APOL1 testing will magnify LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, jeopardizing their informed consent. Given their elevated risk of ESRD post-donation, and AAs' widely-held cultural concerns about genetic testing, it is ethically critical to protect AA LD candidates' safety through APOL1 testing in a culturally competent manner to improve informed decisions about donating. No transplant programs have integrated APOL1 testing into LD evaluation in a culturally competent manner. Clinical "chatbots," mobile apps that use artificial intelligence to provide genetic information to patients and relieve constraints on clinicians' time, can improve informed treatment decisions and reduce decisional conflict. The chatbot "Gia," created by a medical genetics company, can be adapted to any condition. However, no chatbot on APOL1 is currently available. No counseling training programs are available for nephrologists to counsel AA LDs about APOL1 and donation in a culturally competent manner. Given the shortage of genetic counselors, increasing nephrologists' genetic literacy is critical to integrating genetic testing into practice. The objective of this study is to culturally adapt and evaluate the effectiveness of an APOL1 testing program for AA LDs at two transplant centers serving large AA LD populations (Chicago, IL, and Washington, DC). The APOL1 testing program will evaluate the effect of the culturally competent testing, chatbot, and counseling on AA LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, preparedness for decision-making, willingness to donate, and satisfaction with informed consent. The specific aims are to: 1. Adapt Gia and transplant counseling to APOL1 for use in routine clinical practice 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on decisional conflict, preparedness, and willingness to donate in a pre-post design 3. Evaluate the implementation of this intervention into clinical practice by using the RE-AIM framework to longitudinally evaluate nephrologist counseling practices and LDs' satisfaction with informed consent. The impact of this study will be the creation of a model for APOL1 testing of AA LDs, which can then be implemented nationally via implementation science approaches. APOL1 will serve as a model for integrating culturally competent genetic testing into transplant and other practices to improve patient informed consent.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

390 Participants Needed

Simplified vs Full-Length Consent Forms for Clinical Trials

Hamilton, Ontario
The goal of this clinical trial (the SIMPLY-SNAP trial) is to compare a simplified layered consent form to a full-length consent form for use during the informed consent process for a larger clinical trial of treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (the SNAP trial). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does use of a simplified layered consent form lead to an increased recruitment rate to the SNAP trial? * Does use of a simplified layer consent form lead to increased participant understanding of the SNAP trial and increased participant satisfaction with the informed consent process? Participants will be randomized to either the full-length informed consent form or the simplified layered consent form containing links to optional supplementary information or videos. Research staff will use the assigned form to explain the SNAP trial to participants. After consent, participants will be evaluated on their understanding of the SNAP trial and satisfaction with the consent process using a questionnaire.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

346 Participants Needed

Visual Consent for Clinical Trials

Chapel Hill, North Carolina
The investigators plan to conduct a stepped wedge randomized control trial to implement and test the consent template and process in three studies. Randomization will occur at the research coordinator/research team level. Each participating research team member will begin in the standard consent arm of the study. Subsequently, they will be randomized to the visual key information page arm at staggered time points to undergo training and begin using the visual key information page with patients who are eligible for the selected research study.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

515 Participants Needed

Video Education for Decisional Conflict in Prenatal Patients

Providence, Rhode Island
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the impact of a video educational tool on patient decisional conflict at the time when making a decision about prenatal genetic testing. The control group will receive standard prenatal care. The secondary aims include assessing the impact of the video educational tool versus standard care on pregnant participants': perception of likelihood of having a baby affected by a genetic problem, intended plan for genetic testing, patient-provider communication, retention of prenatal genetics knowledge, and perception of genetic data privacy. Participants will be asked to: 1. Watch video education (if randomized to this group) and complete a baseline survey at their dating ultrasound regarding knowledge of prenatal genetics, prior experiences, and demographics 2. Complete a follow up survey after seeing their prenatal care provider regarding: decisional conflict scale with respect to prenatal genetic testing decision (primary outcome), perception of likelihood of having a baby affected by a genetic problem (secondary outcome) and the type of genetic testing chosen (secondary outcome). 3. Complete a second follow up survey six to ten weeks from the second survey to assess: Provider patient communication, retention of genetics knowledge, patient recollection of testing performed, and self-reported out of pocket cost related to genetic testing.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

140 Participants Needed

Video-Consent for Informed Decision-Making

Houston, Texas
This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of video-enhanced consent compared to the usual approach. The investigators aim to assess if video-enhanced consent empowers decision-making and improves understanding in parents considering participation in the ViDES study, which investigates the effectiveness of Vitamin D supplementation in extremely preterm infants (the ViDES study is separately registered as NCT05459298).
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

100 Participants Needed

Educational Tools for Neonatal Screening Consent

Salt Lake city, Utah
The purpose of this study is to implement an electronic consent education process for the retention and research use of residual dried bloodspots at four hospitals in Michigan and assess the impact of the new education, both on patients and hospital staff. The research team will recruit women who have just given birth to answer surveys about the Michigan BioTrust consent process. Surveys will be collected from participants in the hospital and again four weeks later. The research team will collect survey data from patient participants at each hospital prior to hospital staff implementation of the new education process and again after staff implementation.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

5980 Participants Needed

Telehealth Interventions for Diabetes

San Francisco, California
This study examines the impact of a multi-level intervention aiming to improve telehealth access for low-income patients managing chronic health conditions, such as hypertension and diabetes. The multi-level intervention includes clinic-level practice facilitation and patient-level digital health coaching.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

600 Participants Needed

Why Other Patients Applied

"I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."

ID
Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40

"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."

HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78

"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."

FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31

"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."

AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50

"As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."

IZ
Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38

Know someone looking for new options? Spread the word

Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials
How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Informed Consent clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Informed Consent clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Informed Consent trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Informed Consent is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Informed Consent medical study?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Informed Consent clinical trials?

Most recently, we added Recruitment Methods for Stroke Rehabilitation, Visual Consent for Clinical Trials and Video Education for Decisional Conflict in Prenatal Patients to the Power online platform.

Popular Searches

By Condition

Depression Clinical Trials

Anxiety Clinical Trials

Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

ADHD Clinical Trials

Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

Autism Clinical Trials

Treatment Resistant Depression Clinical Trials

Borderline Personality Disorder Clinical Trials

Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials

Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

By Location

Clinical Trials in California

Clinical Trials in Florida

Clinical Trials in Texas

Clinical Trials in New York

Clinical Trials in Ohio

Clinical Trials in Illinois

Clinical Trials in Pennsylvania

Clinical Trials in Michigan

Clinical Trials in North Carolina

Clinical Trials in Massachusetts

Clinical Trials in Missouri

Clinical Trials in Minnesota

Other People Viewed

By Subject

Top Clinical Trials near Cullman, AL

Top Diabetes Clinical Trials near Evansville, IN

Top Depression Clinical Trials near Los Angeles, CA

Top Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials near Washington, DC

Top Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

Top Clinical Trials near Fort Collins, CO

229 Clinical Trials near Holmdel, NJ

Top Clinical Trials near Garland, TX

Top Clinical Trials near Greenville, OH

Top Clinical Trials near Hueytown, AL

Top Lung Cancer Clinical Trials near Chicago, IL

Top Clinical Trials near Jenkintown, PA

By Trial

CAR-GPC3 T Cell Therapy for Cancer

ASTX727 for Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor

Airborne Pathogen Containment Device for Aerosol Generating Procedures

Rilvegostomig + Bevacizumab for Liver Cancer

Selpercatinib for Thyroid Cancer

PRTH-101 + Pembrolizumab for Advanced Cancer

Supportive Care + Nutritional Counseling for Pancreatic Cancer

ASTX029 for Solid Tumors

Bingo Educational Game for Cancer Awareness

Local Consolidative Therapy + Durvalumab for Lung Cancer

DFP-10917 + Venetoclax for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

DE-MRI for Sleep Apnea-Related Heart Changes

Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security
Match to a Trial