Early Detection Of Cancer

Current Location

17 Early Detection Of Cancer Trials Near You

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Early Detection Of Cancer patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Learn More About Power
No Placebo
Highly Paid
Stay on Current Meds
Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
Breakthrough Medication

Early Detection Test for Cancer

Cleveland, Ohio
This trial is testing a new blood test called the GRAIL MCED test, which aims to detect multiple types of cancer early. GRAIL, a company formed by DNA-sequencing giant Illumina, is developing the GRAIL MCED test to detect multiple cancer types early. It targets people who are already recommended for cancer screening. The test works by looking for cancer-related DNA in the blood, and if found, further tests are done to confirm and locate the cancer.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50+

35885 Participants Needed

MRI vs. Ultrasound Screening for Liver Cancer

Cleveland, Ohio
The study is a randomized trial of two different screening methods for early detection of liver cancer in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. The goal of PREMIUM is to compare an abbreviated version of the diagnostic gold standard for HCC (aMRI) +AFP to the standard-of-care screening (US+AFP) in patients at high risk of developing HCC. The investigators hypothesize that HCC will be detected at earlier stages, allowing for more curative treatments and resulting in a reduction in HCC-related mortality.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

4700 Participants Needed

Smoking Cessation Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Patients

Detroit, Michigan
To compare the effectiveness of four interventions to promote sustained, biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence for 6 months among underserved smokers referred for lung cancer screening at four large U.S. health systems.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

3228 Participants Needed

Cancer Screening Methods for Colorectal and Liver Cancer

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Gastrointestinal cancers such as colon cancer and liver cancer cause many deaths in the US. Testing could catch these cancers early, helping people live longer. The goal of this study is to compare two different ways of getting more people tested for these cancers: 1) by directly reaching out to the people who need testing or 2) by helping providers fix issues that hold up testing. The main question it aims to answer is: how should healthcare systems go about choosing one or the other? Researchers will look at cancer testing rates over time at sites that are trying these different approaches. They will also survey and interview participants from these sites.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased

30300 Participants Needed

Implementation Strategy Training for Liver Cancer

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
This trial tests a new decision aid tool that uses machine learning to help healthcare providers choose the best strategies for implementing effective medical practices. The focus is on Veterans with cirrhosis who need cancer screenings. The tool aims to improve screening rates by identifying and overcoming barriers specific to each medical center.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased

8020 Participants Needed

Blood Test for Lung Cancer

DuBois, Pennsylvania
The PROACT LUNG study is a prospective multi-center observational study to validate a blood-based test for the early detection of lung cancer by collecting blood samples from high-risk participants who will undergo a routine, standard-of-care screening Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT).
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Age:50+

20000 Participants Needed

Survivor & Provider Activation for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Chicago, Illinois
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the best method for encouraging high-risk cancer survivors to get screened for colorectal cancer at the recommended age.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:30+

300 Participants Needed

DNA Screening Test Education for Lung Cancer Detection

Durham, North Carolina
This trial aims to see if providing doctors with the FirstLook™ test increases lung cancer screening rates among patients who should be screened but aren't up to date. The test checks blood for early signs of lung cancer by analyzing DNA fragments.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

90 Participants Needed

Telehealth Strategies for Lung Cancer Screening

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
The goal of this pragmatic trial is to learn if telehealth strategies can increase shared decision-making (SDM) for lung cancer screening (LCS). It will also learn about the equity of these strategies by conducting non-inferiority analysis by race and sex. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does patient outreach using synchronous and asynchronous telehealth strategies increase completion of SDM visits for LCS? 2. Is the effectiveness of these telehealth strategies similar by race and sex? The study uses a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design and includes two stages of interventions. The first stage of intervention includes direct patient outreach with an invitation to schedule either a 1) telehealth SDM visit or 2) telehealth or in-person SDM visit. Participants that do not respond to the first stage interventions receive a text message reminder encouraging SDM visit completion with or without digital care coordination.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50 - 80

6000 Participants Needed

Screening Test for Detecting Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer

Montréal, Quebec
Early stage high-grade cancer, endometrial and ovarian, has few, if any, symptoms or signs. When symptoms appear, the disease may be in advanced stage as the disease has left the gynaecological organs and metastasized to the pelvic/abdominal cavity. The McGill research group had showed in the DOvEE trial (NCT02296307), that fast-track assessment with transvaginal ultrasound scans (TVUS) and serial CA125 of women with vague symptoms associated with ovarian and endometrial cancer did diagnose these cancers earlier in the disease trajectory, with low-volume resectable disease, but only after the cancer had already become Stage III. One way to detect these cancers earlier is to screen asymptomatic women. Unfortunately, none of the currently available tests, including TVUS and CA-125 have been shown to be useful for screening for ovarian or endometrial cancer. The McGill team has developed a genomic assay to screen and detect these cancers earlier in the trajectory than is currently the case. The test identifies pathogenic somatic mutations (necessary early steps in the development of these cancers), in an uterine cytological sample. It is able to do so by incorporating a deep machine-learning derived classifier that can discriminate the mutational signature of these cancers from benign disease with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 100% in a population with high background mutational burden. In addition to the intra-uterine cytological sample, the test includes an assay of a saliva sample to identify germline mutations that predispose to hereditary endometrial/ovarian cancers as well as breast and colon cancers. The test was developed in a retrospective population in whom the assay was done pre-operatively and the diagnosis of malignancy versus benign gynecological disease was confirmed by detailed pathological analysis of the uterus, tubes, and ovaries after surgical resection (NCT02288676). The test is now ready to be tested as a phase III diagnostic test in the general population to see if these results are just as promising in the community at large.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:45 - 75
Sex:Female

3600 Participants Needed

Genetic Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening

Boston, Massachusetts
Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer among Veterans and the second leading cause of male cancer death. Current methods of screening men for prostate cancer are inaccurate and cannot identify which men do not have prostate cancer or have low-grade cases that will not cause harm and which men have significant prostate cancer needing treatment. False-positive screening tests can result in unnecessary prostate biopsies for men who do not need them. However, new genetic testing might help identify which men are at highest risk for prostate cancer. This study will examine whether a genetic test helps identify men at risk for significant prostate cancer while helping men who are at low risk for prostate cancer avoid unnecessary biopsies. If this genetic test proves beneficial, it will improve the way that healthcare providers screen male Veterans for prostate cancer.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:55 - 69
Sex:Male

5000 Participants Needed

AI Tool for Lung Cancer Screening

Boston, Massachusetts
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether an AI tool that alerts providers to patients at high 6-year risk of lung cancer based on their chest x-ray images will improve lung cancer screening CT participation. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the AI tool improve lung cancer screening CT participation at 6 months after the baseline outpatient visit The intervention is an alert to the provider to discuss lung cancer screening CT eligibility, for patients considered at high risk of lung cancer based on CXR-LC AI tool. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare intervention and non-intervention arms to determine if lung cancer screen CT participation increases.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50 - 77

1500 Participants Needed

Enhanced Screening for Lung Cancer

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN), and AI/AN have worse lung cancer incidence rates, survival, and death compared to the general population. Because lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality by roughly 20%, the United States Preventive Services Task Force now recommends LCS for men and women aged 55-80 years who meet specific eligibility criteria (grade-B evidence), and subsequently the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) opted to cover this test. However, the uptake of LCS implementation has been slow in most healthcare systems, and LCS implementation among AI/AN has never been studied. To address this knowledge, we prose the "Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Screening (TEALS)" study, which is a collaborative effort between the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, the Stephenson Cancer Center, and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. Over the course of 5 years, TEALS will: 1. Conduct focus groups and semi-structured interviews with CNHSA patients, clinicians, and health administrators to elucidate individual- and system-level barriers and facilitators that affect the implementation of LCS; 2. Develop an LCS care coordination intervention that will identify eligible persons for LCS, help these patients navigate the screening process, and link them with smoking cessation services, when applicable; 3. Measure the impact of the TEALS intervention on the receipt of screening and a set of patient- and practice-level outcomes by conducting a cluster-randomized clinical trial of LCS implementation; and 4. Disseminate the TEALS program to other researchers and healthcare systems that serve AI/AN patients. TEALS will bridge the gap between evidence and clinical practice for LCS in a high-need, low-resource setting by intervening at the level of the healthcare system. System-level interventions for guideline implementation tend to be understudied compared to those evaluating individual-level, behavioral interventions. However, the careful development and evaluation of an LCS screening program at the level of the healthcare system would be critical to ensure that more patients can receive LCS. Our research will create a critically needed platform from which future studies could be launched that will examine how to tailor the application of the LCS guideline to the individual preferences of AI/AN patients. TEALS will establish an effective LCS program in a tribal system and thus provide a direct benefit to the Choctaw Nation by increasing LCS participation. TEALS will serve as a blueprint for establishing a sustainable and accessible infrastructure for LCS in AI/AN and other community health systems. By increasing screening for early stage lung cancer, TEALS could ultimately reduce lung cancer mortality in AI/AN communities.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50 - 80

480 Participants Needed

Cologuard vs FIT for Colorectal Cancer

La Jolla, California
The objective of this pilot study is to compare the effectiveness of mailed outreach of two stool based tests, Cologuard and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in screening eligible adults ages 45-49 receiving care at the University of California San Diego Health system.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:45 - 49

100 Participants Needed

Pancreatic Cancer Detection Test for New-Onset Diabetes

San Diego, California
This trial tests a new blood test to find hidden pancreatic cancer in people aged 50 or older who have been diagnosed with type II diabetes. The test looks for cancer signals in the blood, and if found, an MRI scan is done to confirm the presence of cancer.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50+

10000 Participants Needed

Cologuard vs FIT for Colorectal Cancer Screening

La Jolla, California
The objective of this study is to measure the comparative effectiveness of mailed outreach of two stool based tests, multi-target stool DNA (Cologuard) and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in screening eligible adults ages 45-49 receiving care at the University of California San Diego Health system.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:45 - 49

400 Participants Needed

Surveillance for Cardiotoxicity from Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer

Toronto, Ontario
This study focuses on male and female patients being treated for breast cancer that is positive for the HER2 receptor which requires special treatments targeting that receptor. The problem is that these treatments, while effective for the cancer, can sometimes harm the heart. Because of this, patients have to undergo heart tests every three months during treatment, even if they have no history of heart disease or feel fine. The guidelines for these regular heart tests were established decades ago when these treatments were first introduced, but research shows that most of these tests don't actually change the treatment plan. This suggests that many patients are going through unnecessary tests, which can cause stress, delay treatments, and increase healthcare costs. To address this, the researchers propose a new study with 300 patients with HER2 positive breast cancer to test a more personalized approach to cardiac surveillance. Participants will be classified based on their risk of heart problems: low or intermediate. Instead of testing every patient every three months, those in the intermediate group will be tested every 4 months, and those in the low-risk group will be tested every 6 months. The researchers will compare this new approach to the current system to see if fewer tests are just as safe and effective. The researchers will measure heart health, how well cancer treatments are completed, and how patients feel about having fewer tests. If this new approach works, it could save money and reduce the burden on female patients without risking their health.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

300 Participants Needed

Why Other Patients Applied

"As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."

IZ
Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38

"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."

FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31

"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."

AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50

"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."

WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58

"I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."

ID
Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40

Know someone looking for new options? Spread the word

Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials
How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Early Detection Of Cancer clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Early Detection Of Cancer clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Early Detection Of Cancer trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Early Detection Of Cancer is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Early Detection Of Cancer medical study?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Early Detection Of Cancer clinical trials?

Most recently, we added Cologuard vs FIT for Colorectal Cancer Screening, AI Tool for Lung Cancer Screening and Surveillance for Cardiotoxicity from Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer to the Power online platform.

Popular Searches

By Condition

Depression Clinical Trials

Anxiety Clinical Trials

Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

ADHD Clinical Trials

Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

Autism Clinical Trials

Treatment Resistant Depression Clinical Trials

Borderline Personality Disorder Clinical Trials

Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials

Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

By Location

Clinical Trials in California

Clinical Trials in Florida

Clinical Trials in Texas

Clinical Trials in New York

Clinical Trials in Ohio

Clinical Trials in Illinois

Clinical Trials in Pennsylvania

Clinical Trials in Michigan

Clinical Trials in North Carolina

Clinical Trials in Massachusetts

Clinical Trials in Missouri

Clinical Trials in Minnesota

Other People Viewed

By Subject

27 Arthritis Trials near Dayton, OH

198 Clinical Trials near Bonne Terre, MO

40 Depression Trials near Cleveland, OH

Top Clinical Trials near New Orleans, LA

Top Anorexia Clinical Trials

198 Clinical Trials near Conyers, GA

Top Clinical Trials near San Francisco, CA

Top Clinical Trials near Daytona Beach, FL

107 Diabetes Trials near San Antonio, TX

22 Clinical Paid Trials near Fargo, ND

Top Clinical Trials near Buffalo Grove, IL

Top Pompe Disease Clinical Trials

By Trial

Robotic Gait Training for Spinal Cord Injury

Magnetic Lymph Node Mapping for Stomach Cancer

Zinc Therapy for Critical Illness

Anti-Adhesive Film for Tissue Adhesions

Psilocybin for Depression in Autism

E7820 for Leukemia

Microbiome Assessment for Shift Workers

Lofexidine + Buprenorphine for PTSD

iKinnect2.0 App for Suicide Risk in Youth

TMLI + Alemtuzumab for Sickle Cell Disease

Nutritional Supplementation for Bruising

JNJ-77242113 for Plaque Psoriasis

Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security
Match to a Trial