4700 Participants Needed

MRI vs. Ultrasound Screening for Liver Cancer

(PREMIUM Trial)

Recruiting at 17 trial locations
GN
TH
Overseen ByTamar H Taddei, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests two methods for screening liver cancer in individuals with liver cirrhosis. The researchers aim to determine if a shortened MRI test (Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging with serum AFP) combined with a blood test is more effective at detecting early liver cancer than the usual ultrasound scan (Abdominal Ultrasound Screening with serum AFP) plus the same blood test. Early cancer detection may lead to more treatment options and better outcomes. Individuals with cirrhosis who are at high risk for liver cancer and have not been diagnosed with or suspected of having liver cancer may be suitable for this trial. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to contribute to research that could enhance early detection methods for liver cancer.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. Please consult with the study team for guidance.

What prior data suggests that these screening methods are safe for liver cancer detection?

Research has shown that using a simpler MRI scan without contrast dye, known as non-contrast abbreviated MRI (aMRI), along with a blood test for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), effectively detects liver cancer. This method performs as well as traditional screening methods. aMRI is emerging as a promising alternative to ultrasound for liver cancer screening, particularly for high-risk individuals. Studies indicate that the aMRI approach is easy for patients to handle and avoids contrast dye, reducing the risk of side effects often linked to full MRI procedures.

Conversely, an abdominal ultrasound with AFP remains a standard method and is generally well-tolerated, having been widely used without significant safety concerns. Both screening methods aim to detect liver cancer at earlier stages, potentially leading to more effective treatments.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores whether abbreviated MRI combined with serum AFP can provide more effective liver cancer screening compared to the traditional abdominal ultrasound with serum AFP. Unlike ultrasounds, which are commonly used but sometimes miss small tumors, abbreviated MRI might offer clearer and more detailed images, potentially leading to earlier detection of liver cancer. This trial aims to find out if the advanced imaging capabilities of MRI can improve screening accuracy, helping doctors catch cancer at an earlier, more treatable stage.

What evidence suggests that this trial's screening methods could be effective for early detection of liver cancer?

This trial will compare two screening methods for liver cancer: Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging with serum AFP (aMRI+AFP) and Abdominal Ultrasound Screening with serum AFP (US+AFP). Research has shown that using a shorter MRI scan (aMRI) with a blood test for a protein marker (AFP) holds promise for early liver cancer detection. Studies have found that aMRI correctly identifies liver cancer 83% of the time and accurately rules it out 91% of the time when absent. This method effectively detects liver cancer and confirms its absence. Compared to traditional ultrasound, aMRI with AFP may reduce liver cancer deaths by 35%. While the AFP test alone isn't always perfect, combining it with aMRI enhances its effectiveness. Overall, this approach shows strong potential for early liver cancer detection, improving the chances of successful treatment.12346

Who Is on the Research Team?

GN

George N. Ioannou, MD MS

Principal Investigator

VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults aged 18-75 with liver cirrhosis, diagnosed through biopsy or other specific medical criteria. Participants must be at high risk of developing liver cancer but cannot have had a prior diagnosis of HCC, organ transplants, severe comorbid conditions, or certain metal implants that interfere with MRI scans.

Inclusion Criteria

I have been diagnosed with cirrhosis through a biopsy, imaging, physical signs, or specific tests.

Exclusion Criteria

My health conditions limit my life expectancy due to a high CirCom score.
My kidney function is low, with a GFR under 30 ml/min.
I have had an organ transplant or am waiting for one.
See 5 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Randomization and Initial Screening

Participants are randomized to either the aMRI+AFP or US+AFP screening arms and begin initial screening

6 months
1 visit every 6 months

Ongoing Screening

Participants continue with their assigned screening method (aMRI+AFP or US+AFP) every 6 months

7.5 years
1 visit every 6 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for mortality and other outcomes after the screening period

8 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging with serum AFP
  • Abdominal Ultrasound Screening with serum AFP
Trial Overview The PREMIUM study compares two screening methods for early detection of liver cancer in high-risk patients: abbreviated MRI plus serum AFP test versus standard abdominal ultrasound plus serum AFP test. The aim is to find out if the former can detect cancer earlier and reduce mortality.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging with serum AFPExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Abdominal Ultrasound Screening with serum AFPActive Control1 Intervention

Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging with serum AFP is already approved in United States for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Abbreviated MRI with AFP for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

VA Office of Research and Development

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,691
Recruited
3,759,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) is a cost-effective method for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in cirrhotic patients, showing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Thailand and $37,062 per QALY in the United States.
aMRI outperforms the combination of ultrasonography and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing in cost-effectiveness, particularly in populations with higher HCC incidence, making it a valuable tool for early detection in high-risk patients.
Cost-Utility Analysis of Non-Contrast Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Cirrhosis.Decharatanachart, P., Pan-Ngum, W., Peeraphatdit, T., et al.[2023]
Patients prioritize higher sensitivity in screening tests for hepatocellular carcinoma, with an importance score of 39.8%, indicating that they value the ability to accurately detect cancer over other factors.
Cost and lower false-positive rates are also significant considerations for patients, with scores of 22.8% and 19.4% respectively, suggesting that affordability and test reliability are crucial for patient adherence to screening recommendations.
Eliciting Patient Preferences for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.Fazeli, S., Covarrubias, Y., Bassirian, S., et al.[2022]
The MIRACLE-HCC study is a prospective trial involving 416 patients with compensated liver cirrhosis, comparing the effectiveness of noncontrast MRI versus noncontrast ultrasound for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
This study aims to determine if noncontrast MRI can detect early-stage HCC more effectively than ultrasound and whether it results in fewer false positive referrals, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance (MIRACLE-HCC): study protocol for a prospective randomized trial.An, C., Kim, DY., Choi, JY., et al.[2018]

Citations

Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for HCC ...Although the addition of AFP modestly improves sensitivity, it has suboptimal performance for HCC screening and surveillance, being elevated in ...
The combination of non-contrast abbreviated MRI and ...This study aimed to compare two abbreviated MRI (AMRI) protocols to complete MRI for HCC detection: non-contrast (NC)-AMRI without/with alpha ...
NCT05486572 | Preventing Liver Cancer Mortality Through ...The study is powered to detect a minimum relative reduction in HCC-related mortality of 35% in the aMRI+AFP arm compared to the US+AFP arm, i.e. a reduction in ...
Abbreviated MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma SurveillanceThe NC-aMRI protocols reported in 21 studies exhibited 83% (79–87%, 63%) sensitivity and 91% (88–93%, 67%) specificity, while the 15 studies on CE-aMRI ...
MRI vs. Ultrasound Screening for Liver CancerResearch shows that using non-contrast abbreviated MRI (aMRI) with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is effective for detecting liver cancer, performing comparably to ...
Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular ...The purpose of this review was to present an overview of the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of liver MRI as an HCC surveillance tool.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security