Apraxia

Current Location

11 Apraxia Trials Near You

Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Apraxia patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

Learn More About Power
No Placebo
Highly Paid
Stay on Current Meds
Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
Breakthrough Medication

DTTC Frequency for Childhood Apraxia of Speech

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a pediatric motor-based speech sound disorder that requires a specialized approach to intervention (Maas et al., 2014). The extant literature on the treatment of CAS commonly recommends intensive treatment using a motor-based approach, with some of the best evidence supporting the use of Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC; Strand, 2020). To date, a rigorous and systematic comparison of high and low dose frequency has not been undertaken for DTTC, resulting in a lack of evidence to guide decisions about the optimal treatment schedule for this intervention. The current study aims to fill this gap in knowledge by comparing treatment outcomes when dose frequency is varied. The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the number of treatment sessions per week has an effect on intervention outcomes in 60 children with CAS. The main question this research will address is whether whole word accuracy will differ between two groups of children undergoing DTTC treatment when one group of children receives treatment twice a week for 12 weeks and the other group receives treatment 4 times a week for 6 weeks. Community clinicians will administer all treatment sessions.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:30 - 95

60 Participants Needed

tDCS + Speech-Language Therapy for Aphasia

Baltimore, Maryland
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects first and foremost language abilities. There are three different variants of PPA, each a relatively distinct speech and language profile. For individuals with non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA), a core symptom is apraxia of speech (AOS), which is defined as an oral motor speech disorder. Such a disorder inhibits one's ability to translate speech plans into motor plans and results in longer segmental durations and reduced rate of syllabic production. This research project investigates the behavioral and neuromodulatory effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during language therapy in participants with nfvPPA over time. Anodal tDCS targeting the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) administered in combination with language therapy is expected to be more beneficial when compared to language therapy alone (sham). The investigators believe tDCS during language therapy will 1) improve language performance or decrease rate of decline, 2) promote better-sustained effects at 2 weeks and 2 months post-treatment, and 3) produce generalization to untrained language items and some other cognitive functions. Resting-state fMRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and volumetric data are also collected to investigate changes in functional brain connectivity associated with tDCS in individuals with PPA. A better understanding of the therapeutic and neuromodulatory mechanisms of tDCS as an adjunct to language therapy in nfvPPA may have a significant impact on the development of effective therapies for PPA, and may offer insight into ways of impeding neurodegeneration that may improve patients' quality of life, as well as extend patients' ability to work and manage patients' affairs.

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:50 - 90

60 Participants Needed

ASSIST for Childhood Apraxia of Speech

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a pediatric motor speech disorder that impairs the planning of movements needed for intelligible speech. Children with CAS often show little or slow progress in standard speech therapy. This research is a Phase 1 study that tests initial efficacy and optimal parameters of a theoretically based integral stimulation treatment called ASSIST (Apraxia of Speech Systematic Integral Stimulation Treatment). In three small randomized group design studies, children (N=20 per study) receive 16 hours of individual ASSIST. The three studies systematically investigate treatment intensity (2 vs. 4 weeks) and two critical aspects of target selection: complexity (simple vs. complex target) and lexicality (words vs. nonwords). Each study also systematically examines the effect of treatment on functional outcome measures, including parent ratings of intelligibility and communicative participation, and objective intelligibility measures obtained from unfamiliar listeners.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:4 - 9

420 Participants Needed

DTTC with Caregiver Training for Childhood Apraxia of Speech

New York, New York
This trial tests which type of caregiver training helps children with childhood apraxia of speech improve their speaking abilities more effectively. Children receive specialized speech therapy and practice at home with their caregivers. The study aims to see which method leads to better speech accuracy and communication skills.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:24 - 95

40 Participants Needed

Motor-based Intervention for Childhood Apraxia of Speech

New York, New York
This trial tests a special method called DTTC to help young children with speech difficulties improve their speaking skills. The method uses touch and timing cues to guide mouth movements, aiming to make their speech clearer. The study focuses on young children who have trouble coordinating their speech.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:29 - 95

72 Participants Needed

tDCS for Speech Impairment After Stroke

New York, New York
This trial is testing whether combining a gentle brain stimulation technique called tDCS with regular speech therapy can better help people who have trouble speaking due to brain injury. tDCS uses a mild electrical current to help the brain learn and adapt, which has been successful in other types of stroke recovery. tDCS has been shown to be effective in improving language recovery in post-stroke aphasia.

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

24 Participants Needed

AV-1451 Imaging for Apraxia of Speech

Rochester, Minnesota
The study is designed to determine the relationship between structural and functional changes in the brain on imaging and progression of speech and language, neurological and neuropsychological features in patients with neurodegenerative apraxia of speech (AOS).
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 4

50 Participants Needed

Motor Imagery for Apraxia of Speech

Orlando, Florida
Treatment of post-stroke apraxia of speech (AOS) requires frequent and ongoing practice with a speech-language pathologist to facilitate lasting behavioral change, which is costly and, therefore, inaccessible to many patients. Thus, there is a critical need to identify novel, cost-effective ways to supplement speech therapy to increase opportunities for practice and optimize treatment outcomes. Our long-term goal is to develop an effective, home-practice, computer-based, motor imagery protocol Motor Imagery for Treatment Enhancement and Efficacy (MI-TEE) which will serve as an adjunct to routine speech therapy to optimize treatment response in persons with AOS. The overall objectives of this application are to (i) evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of MI-TEE as a home practice program and (ii) determine the efficacy of MI-TEE with speech therapy, compared to speech therapy alone, in improving speech production in people with AOS. Our central hypothesis is that MI-TEE will be an accessible, feasible, and efficacious adjunct to speech therapy. To attain our objectives, the following specific aims will be pursued using two single-subject experimental designs with multiple baselines across participants (n=18): 1) Evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of MI-TEE as an adjunct to speech therapy for the rehabilitation of AOS; and 2) Compare the efficacy of adjunctive MI-TEE plus standard speech therapy to standard speech therapy alone. Under the first aim, observational data, surveys, and semi-structured interviews will be employed to assess the acceptability (perceived satisfaction, appropriateness, and intent to continue use) and feasibility (recruitment, retention, and intervention adherence rates) of MI-TEE. For the second aim, accuracy of articulation for trained words and untrained words (generalization) will be measured pre-treatment, repeatedly during the treatment phase, and post-treatment. Improvements in speech accuracy will be documented using a binary scoring system (correct/incorrect). Multilevel analyses will be used to address rate of acquisition, overall change, and response variation across participants.
Stay on current meds
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

18 Participants Needed

AAC Generative Language Intervention for Speech Disorders

Orlando, Florida
The focus of the current study is to systematically investigate the psychometric properties of a range of aided language measures, which are based on the Graphic Symbol Utterance and Sentence Development Framework (Binger \& Kent-Walsh).
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:42 - 60

60 Participants Needed

Brain Stimulation for Speech Disorders

Dallas, Texas
The purpose of the study is to test whether low level electric stimulation, called transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), on the part of the brain (i.e., pre-supplementary motor area and left inferior frontal gyrus) thought to aid in memory will improve speech and language difficulties in patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS). The primary outcome measures are neuropsychological assessments of speech and language functions, and the secondary measures are neuropsychological assessments of other cognitive abilities and electroencephalography (EEG) measures.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased

12 Participants Needed

Speech-Language Therapy for Primary Progressive Aphasia

Austin, Texas
Difficulties with speech and language are the first and most notable symptoms of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). While there is evidence that demonstrates positive effects of speech-language treatment for individuals with PPA who only speak one language (monolinguals), there is a significant need for investigating the effects of treatment that is optimized for bilingual speakers with PPA. This stage 2 efficacy clinical trial seeks to establish the effects of culturally and linguistically tailored speech-language interventions administered to bilingual individuals with PPA. The overall aim of the intervention component of this study is to establish the relationships between the bilingual experience (e.g., how often each language is used, how "strong" each language is) and treatment response of bilinguals with PPA. Specifically, the investigators will evaluate the benefits of tailored speech-language intervention administered in both languages to bilingual individuals with PPA (60 individuals will be recruited). The investigators will conduct an assessment before treatment, after treatment and at two follow-ups (6 and 12-months post-treatment) in both languages. When possible, a structural scan of the brain (magnetic resonance image) will be collected before treatment in order to identify if brain regions implicated in bilingualism are associated with response to treatment. In addition to the intervention described herein, 30 bilingual individuals with PPA will be recruited to complete behavioral cognitive-linguistic testing and will not receive intervention. Results will provide important knowledge about the neural mechanisms of language re-learning and will address how specific characteristics of bilingualism influence cognitive reserve and linguistic resilience in PPA.
No Placebo Group

Trial Details

Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:40+

60 Participants Needed

Why Other Patients Applied

"I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."

ID
Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40

"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."

WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58

"As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."

IZ
Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38

"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."

AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50

"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."

HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78

Know someone looking for new options? Spread the word

Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials
How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do Apraxia clinical trials pay?

Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

How do Apraxia clinical trials work?

After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Apraxia trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Apraxia is 12 months.

How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

Do I need to be insured to participate in a Apraxia medical study?

Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

What are the newest Apraxia clinical trials?

Most recently, we added AAC Generative Language Intervention for Speech Disorders, Motor Imagery for Apraxia of Speech and DTTC with Caregiver Training for Childhood Apraxia of Speech to the Power online platform.

Popular Searches

By Condition

Depression Clinical Trials

Anxiety Clinical Trials

Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

ADHD Clinical Trials

Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

Autism Clinical Trials

Treatment Resistant Depression Clinical Trials

Borderline Personality Disorder Clinical Trials

Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials

Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

By Location

Clinical Trials in California

Clinical Trials in Florida

Clinical Trials in Texas

Clinical Trials in New York

Clinical Trials in Ohio

Clinical Trials in Illinois

Clinical Trials in Pennsylvania

Clinical Trials in Michigan

Clinical Trials in North Carolina

Clinical Trials in Massachusetts

Clinical Trials in Missouri

Clinical Trials in Minnesota

Other People Viewed

By Subject

Top Clinical Trials near Concord, NH

Top Addiction Clinical Trials

Top Clinical Trials near Albuquerque, NM

Top Clinical Trials near Syracuse, NY

13 Autism Trials near Cincinnati, OH

23 Leiomyosarcoma Trials near San Diego, CA

Top Clinical Trials near Canton, MI

199 Clinical Trials near Fort Pierce, FL

Top Clinical Trials near Kankakee, IL

Top Stomach Cancer Clinical Trials

Top Clinical Trials near Hialeah Gardens, FL

Top Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Trials

By Trial

ABBV-932 for Bipolar Disorder

Radiotherapy + Checkpoint Inhibitor for Kidney Cancer

Caregiving Course for Dementia

Whole Brain vs Stereotactic Radiation for Brain Cancer

Vision Training for Low Vision

Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib for Thyroid Cancer

LITT + Radiation for Brain Tumor

Weight Loss and Exercise for Insulin Resistance in Aging

IVT GBS-06 Vaccine for Asymptomatic Carriers

Oral Erdafitinib for Bladder Cancer

Post-Stroke Monitoring Strategies for Ischemic Stroke

Progesterone + Estradiol for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security
Match to a Trial